Literature DB >> 29362876

Variability of Denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

M Laroche1, C Baradat2, A Ruyssen-Witrand2, Y Degboe2.   

Abstract

The objective of our prospective study is to specify the variability of densitometric response to Denosumab, given in the second line, and to try to understand the reasons. All menopausal patients with primary osteoporosis, treated by Denosumab in our centre from 2014 to 2015, were included in this open prospective work. At T0, the patient's age, type of fracture, and previous treatments were collated. At T0 and T1, after 1 year of treatment by Dmab, a DXA of the spine and the hip and a determination of CTX were performed. Sixty-three patients aged 68.8 ± 8.3 years were included. The median number of treatments prescribed for osteoporosis before switch to Denosumab was 2.4. The median duration of these treatments was 7.2 years. At T1, CTX was less than 33 pg/ml (minimum threshold for our assay kit) in all patients. The median BMD in the spine increased by + 5.44% compared to T0. 14 patients in the upper quartile had a median BMD gain in the spine of + 11.07%. Fourteen patients in the lower quartile had a median BMD gain in the spine of + 0.6%. Only the duration of previous treatments, which was greater in the non-responder group, differed between these two groups. In the total cohort, the spinal densitometric gain was negatively correlated with the age of the patient at baseline (p = 0.04), the duration of previous treatment (p = 0.02), and positively with the CTX level (p = 0.05). The Dmab densitometric response is highly variable, partly explained by the duration of previous treatments and the level of bone resorption at initiation of treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMD; Denosumab; Osteoporosis; Variability of response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29362876     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-3929-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  19 in total

1.  Effects of denosumab on bone histomorphometry: the FREEDOM and STAND studies.

Authors:  Ian R Reid; Paul D Miller; Jacques P Brown; David L Kendler; Astrid Fahrleitner-Pammer; Ivo Valter; Katre Maasalu; Michael A Bolognese; Grattan Woodson; Henry Bone; Beiying Ding; Rachel B Wagman; Javier San Martin; Michael S Ominsky; David W Dempster
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Individual smallest detectable difference in bone mineral density measurements.

Authors:  P Ravaud; J L Reny; B Giraudeau; R Porcher; M Dougados; C Roux
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Effect of denosumab on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover: six-year results of a phase 2 clinical trial.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Rachel B Wagman; Munro Peacock; E Michael Lewiecki; Michael A Bolognese; Richard L Weinstein; Beiying Ding; Javier San Martin; Michael R McClung
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women transitioning from alendronate therapy.

Authors:  David L Kendler; Christian Roux; Claude Laurent Benhamou; Jacques P Brown; Michael Lillestol; Suresh Siddhanti; Hoi-Shen Man; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jacques P Brown; Richard L Prince; Chad Deal; Robert R Recker; Douglas P Kiel; Luiz H de Gregorio; Peyman Hadji; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Jose M Alvaro-Gracia; Huei Wang; Matthew Austin; Rachel B Wagman; Richard Newmark; Cesar Libanati; Javier San Martin; Henry G Bone
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Denosumab compared with ibandronate in postmenopausal women previously treated with bisphosphonate therapy: a randomized open-label trial.

Authors:  Chris Recknor; Edward Czerwinski; Henry G Bone; Sydney L Bonnick; Neil Binkley; Santiago Palacios; Alfred Moffett; Suresh Siddhanti; Irene Ferreira; Prayashi Ghelani; Rachel B Wagman; Jesse W Hall; Michael A Bolognese; Claude-Laurent Benhamou
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Denosumab compared with risedronate in postmenopausal women suboptimally adherent to alendronate therapy: efficacy and safety results from a randomized open-label study.

Authors:  C Roux; L C Hofbauer; P R Ho; J D Wark; M C Zillikens; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; F Hawkins; M Micaelo; S Minisola; N Papaioannou; M Stone; I Ferreira; S Siddhanti; R B Wagman; J P Brown
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  The effects of switching daily teriparatide to oral bisphosphonates or denosumab in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kosuke Ebina; Jun Hashimoto; Masafumi Kashii; Makoto Hirao; Shoichi Kaneshiro; Takaaki Noguchi; Yasunori Tsukamoto; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Relationship between pretreatment rate of bone loss and bone density response to once-yearly ZOL: HORIZON-PFT extension study.

Authors:  Richard Eastell; Steven Boonen; Felicia Cosman; Ian R Reid; Lisa Palermo; Steven R Cummings; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Denosumab or Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Previously Treated With Oral Bisphosphonates.

Authors:  P D Miller; N Pannacciulli; J P Brown; E Czerwinski; B S Nedergaard; M A Bolognese; J Malouf; H G Bone; J-Y Reginster; A Singer; C Wang; R B Wagman; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  1 in total

1.  Denosumab mid-term densitometric gain in postmenopausal osteoporosis women in clinical practice: comment on "Variability of denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis".

Authors:  V Torrente-Segarra; D Roig-Vilaseca
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.631

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.