Literature DB >> 24141036

Denosumab compared with risedronate in postmenopausal women suboptimally adherent to alendronate therapy: efficacy and safety results from a randomized open-label study.

C Roux1, L C Hofbauer, P R Ho, J D Wark, M C Zillikens, A Fahrleitner-Pammer, F Hawkins, M Micaelo, S Minisola, N Papaioannou, M Stone, I Ferreira, S Siddhanti, R B Wagman, J P Brown.   

Abstract

Denosumab has been shown to reduce new vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In subjects who were treatment-naïve or previously treated with alendronate, denosumab was associated with greater gains in bone mineral density (BMD) and decreases in bone turnover markers when compared with alendronate-treated subjects. This trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of denosumab with risedronate over 12 months in postmenopausal women who transitioned from daily or weekly alendronate treatment and were considered to be suboptimally adherent to therapy. In this randomized, open-label study, postmenopausal women aged ≥55 years received denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months or risedronate 150 mg orally every month for 12 months. Endpoints included percentage change from baseline in total hip BMD (primary endpoint), femoral neck, and lumbar spine BMD at month 12, and percentage change from baseline in sCTX-1 at months 1 and 6. Safety was also assessed. A total of 870 subjects were randomized (435, risedronate; 435, denosumab) who had a mean (SD) age of 67.7 (6.9) years, mean (SD) BMD T-scores of -1.6 (0.9), -1.9 (0.7), and -2.2 (1.2) at the total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine, respectively, and median sCTX-1 of 0.3 ng/mL at baseline. At month 12, denosumab significantly increased BMD compared with risedronate at the total hip (2.0% vs 0.5%), femoral neck (1.4% vs 0%), and lumbar spine (3.4% vs 1.1%; p<0.0001 at all sites). Denosumab significantly decreased sCTX-1 compared with risedronate at month 1 (median change from baseline of -78% vs -17%; p<0.0001) and month 6 (-61% vs -23%; p<0.0001). Overall and serious adverse events were similar between groups. In postmenopausal women who were suboptimally adherent to alendronate therapy, transitioning to denosumab was well tolerated and more effective than risedronate in increasing BMD and reducing bone turnover.
© 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Bone turnover markers; Denosumab; Postmenopausal osteoporosis; Risedronate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24141036     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  58 in total

Review 1.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Comparison of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Houchen Lyu; Bakr Jundi; Chang Xu; Sara K Tedeschi; Kazuki Yoshida; Sizheng Zhao; Sagar U Nigwekar; Benjamin Z Leder; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Adjudication of osteonecrosis of the jaw in phase III randomized controlled trials of denosumab: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul de Boissieu; L Kanagaratnam; R Mahmoudi; A Morel; M Dramé; T Trenque
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients previously treated with zoledronic acid.

Authors:  A D Anastasilakis; S A Polyzos; A Gkiomisi; Z G Saridakis; D Digkas; I Bisbinas; G T Sakellariou; A Papatheodorou; P Kokkoris; P Makras
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or low bone mineral density: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenyu Zhou; Chen Chen; Jun Zhang; Xinran Ji; Lifeng Liu; Guichun Zhang; Xuecheng Cao; Pingshan Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

7.  Efficacy and safety of denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women previously treated with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  P D Miller; N Pannacciulli; J Malouf-Sierra; A Singer; E Czerwiński; H G Bone; C Wang; S Huang; A Chines; W Lems; J P Brown
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Variability of Denosumab densitometric response in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Laroche; C Baradat; A Ruyssen-Witrand; Y Degboe
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  The guiding role of bone metabolism test in osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Guo-Ji Yang; Shi-Xian Wu; Dong-Qing Li; Ying-Bo Xu; Cheng-Hong Ma; Jun-Ling Wang; Wei-Wen Chen
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2018-04-05

Review 10.  Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.