OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe patterns of health care use prior to first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in a population-based sample. METHOD: Electronic health records and insurance claims from five large integrated health systems were used to identify 624 patients 15-29 years old who received a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in any care setting and to record health services received, diagnoses assigned, and medications dispensed during the previous 36 months. Patterns of utilization were compared between patients receiving a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder and matched samples of general health system members and members receiving a first diagnosis of unipolar depression. RESULTS: During the year before a first psychotic disorder diagnosis, 29% of patients had mental health specialty outpatient care, 8% had mental health inpatient care, 24% had emergency department mental health care, 29% made a primary care visit with a mental health diagnosis, and 60% received at least one mental health diagnosis (including substance use disorders). Compared with patients receiving a first diagnosis of unipolar depression, those with a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder were modestly more likely to use all types of health services and were specifically more likely to use mental health inpatient care (odds ratio=2.96, 95% CI=1.97-4.43) and mental health emergency department care (rate ratio=3.74, 95% CI=3.39-4.53). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder had some indication of mental health care need during the previous year. General use of primary care or mental health services, however, does not clearly distinguish people who later receive a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder from those who later receive a diagnosis of unipolar depression. Use of inpatient or emergency department mental health care is a more specific indicator of risk.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to describe patterns of health care use prior to first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in a population-based sample. METHOD: Electronic health records and insurance claims from five large integrated health systems were used to identify 624 patients 15-29 years old who received a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in any care setting and to record health services received, diagnoses assigned, and medications dispensed during the previous 36 months. Patterns of utilization were compared between patients receiving a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder and matched samples of general health system members and members receiving a first diagnosis of unipolar depression. RESULTS: During the year before a first psychotic disorder diagnosis, 29% of patients had mental health specialty outpatient care, 8% had mental health inpatient care, 24% had emergency department mental health care, 29% made a primary care visit with a mental health diagnosis, and 60% received at least one mental health diagnosis (including substance use disorders). Compared with patients receiving a first diagnosis of unipolar depression, those with a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder were modestly more likely to use all types of health services and were specifically more likely to use mental health inpatient care (odds ratio=2.96, 95% CI=1.97-4.43) and mental health emergency department care (rate ratio=3.74, 95% CI=3.39-4.53). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving a first diagnosis of a psychotic disorder had some indication of mental health care need during the previous year. General use of primary care or mental health services, however, does not clearly distinguish people who later receive a diagnosis of a psychotic disorder from those who later receive a diagnosis of unipolar depression. Use of inpatient or emergency department mental health care is a more specific indicator of risk.
Authors: David E Arterburn; Gwen L Alexander; Josephine Calvi; Laura A Coleman; Matthew W Gillman; Rachel Novotny; Virginia P Quinn; Margaret Rukstalis; Victor J Stevens; Elsie M Taveras; Nancy E Sherwood Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2010-08-03
Authors: Helga K Ising; Wim Veling; Rachel L Loewy; Marleen W Rietveld; Judith Rietdijk; Sara Dragt; Rianne M C Klaassen; Dorien H Nieman; Lex Wunderink; Don H Linszen; Mark van der Gaag Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Michael Schoenbaum; Jason M Sutherland; Andre Chappel; Susan Azrin; Amy B Goldstein; Agnes Rupp; Robert K Heinssen Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Robert Rosenheck; Douglas Leslie; Kyaw Sint; Haiqun Lin; Delbert G Robinson; Nina R Schooler; Kim T Mueser; David L Penn; Jean Addington; Mary F Brunette; Christoph U Correll; Sue E Estroff; Patricia Marcy; James Robinson; Joanne Severe; Agnes Rupp; Michael Schoenbaum; John M Kane Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-01-31 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: M Heslin; B Lomas; J M Lappin; K Donoghue; U Reininghaus; A Onyejiaka; T Croudace; P B Jones; R M Murray; P Fearon; P Dazzan; C Morgan; G A Doody Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Paolo Fusar-Poli; Marco Cappucciati; Grazia Rutigliano; Margaret Heslin; Daniel Stahl; Zera Brittenden; Edgardo Caverzasi; Philip McGuire; William T Carpenter Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Karen J Coleman; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Arne Beck; Frances L Lynch; Christine Stewart; Robert S Penfold; Enid M Hunkeler; Belinda H Operskalski; Gregory E Simon Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Meredith G Harris; Alan E Kazdin; Wai Tat Chiu; Nancy A Sampson; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Ali Al-Hamzawi; Jordi Alonso; Yasmin Altwaijri; Laura Helena Andrade; Graça Cardoso; Alfredo Cía; Silvia Florescu; Oye Gureje; Chiyi Hu; Elie G Karam; Georges Karam; Zeina Mneimneh; Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Bibilola D Oladeji; Siobhan O'Neill; Kate Scott; Tim Slade; Yolanda Torres; Daniel Vigo; Bogdan Wojtyniak; Zahari Zarkov; Yuval Ziv; Ronald C Kessler Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ying Chen; Saeed Farooq; John Edwards; Carolyn A Chew-Graham; David Shiers; Martin Frisher; Richard Hayward; Athula Sumathipala; Kelvin P Jordan Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 8.775