| Literature DB >> 26834024 |
Robert Rosenheck1, Douglas Leslie2, Kyaw Sint3, Haiqun Lin3, Delbert G Robinson, Nina R Schooler4, Kim T Mueser5, David L Penn6, Jean Addington7, Mary F Brunette8, Christoph U Correll, Sue E Estroff9, Patricia Marcy10, James Robinson11, Joanne Severe12, Agnes Rupp12, Michael Schoenbaum12, John M Kane.
Abstract
This study compares the cost-effectiveness of Navigate (NAV), a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, team-based treatment approach for first episode psychosis (FEP) and usual Community Care (CC) in a cluster randomization trial. Patients at 34 community treatment clinics were randomly assigned to either NAV (N = 223) or CC (N = 181) for 2 years. Effectiveness was measured as a one standard deviation change on the Quality of Life Scale (QLS-SD). Incremental cost effectiveness ratios were evaluated with bootstrap distributions. The Net Health Benefits Approach was used to evaluate the probability that the value of NAV benefits exceeded its costs relative to CC from the perspective of the health care system. The NAV group improved significantly more on the QLS and had higher outpatient mental health and antipsychotic medication costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $12 081/QLS-SD, with a .94 probability that NAV was more cost-effective than CC at $40 000/QLS-SD. When converted to monetized Quality Adjusted Life Years, NAV benefits exceeded costs, especially at future generic drug prices. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center 2016.Entities:
Keywords: cost-effectiveness; quality adjusted life years; schizophrenia
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26834024 PMCID: PMC4903057 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbv224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schizophr Bull ISSN: 0586-7614 Impact factor: 9.306