Literature DB >> 22516147

The validity of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population.

Helga K Ising1, Wim Veling, Rachel L Loewy, Marleen W Rietveld, Judith Rietdijk, Sara Dragt, Rianne M C Klaassen, Dorien H Nieman, Lex Wunderink, Don H Linszen, Mark van der Gaag.   

Abstract

In order to bring about implementation of routine screening for psychosis risk, a brief version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ; Loewy et al., 2005) was developed and tested in a general help-seeking population. We assessed a consecutive patient sample of 3533 young adults who were help-seeking for nonpsychotic disorders at the secondary mental health services in The Hague with the PQ. We performed logistic regression analyses and CHi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector decision tree analysis to shorten the original 92 items. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to examine the psychometric properties of the PQ-16. In the general help-seeking population, a cutoff score of 6 or more positively answered items on the 16-item version of the PQ produced correct classification of Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State (Yung et al., 2005) psychosis risk/clinical psychosis in 44% of the cases, distinguishing Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS) diagnosis from no CAARMS diagnosis with high sensitivity (87%) and specificity (87%). These results were comparable to the PQ-92. The PQ-16 is a good self-report screen for use in secondary mental health care services to select subjects for interviewing for psychosis risk. The low number of items makes it quite appropriate for screening large help-seeking populations, thus enhancing the feasibility of detection and treatment of ultra high-risk patients in routine mental health services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22516147      PMCID: PMC3713086          DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbs068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Bull        ISSN: 0586-7614            Impact factor:   9.306


  24 in total

1.  Potential stigma associated with inclusion of the psychosis risk syndrome in the DSM-V: an empirical question.

Authors:  Lawrence H Yang; Ahtoy J Wonpat-Borja; Mark G Opler; Cheryl M Corcoran
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States.

Authors:  Alison R Yung; Hok Pan Yuen; Patrick D McGorry; Lisa J Phillips; Daniel Kelly; Margaret Dell'Olio; Shona M Francey; Elizabeth M Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Carrie Stanford; Katherine Godfrey; Joe Buckby
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.744

3.  Economic impact of early intervention in people at high risk of psychosis.

Authors:  L R Valmaggia; P McCrone; M Knapp; J B Woolley; M R Broome; P Tabraham; L C Johns; C Prescott; E Bramon; J Lappin; P Power; P K McGuire
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Prescription of antipsychotic medication to patients at ultra high risk of developing psychosis.

Authors:  Dorien H Nieman; Wera H Rike; Hiske E Becker; Peter M Dingemans; Thérèse A van Amelsvoort; Lieuwe de Haan; Mark van der Gaag; Damiaan A J P Denys; Don H Linszen
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.659

5.  The incidence and outcome of subclinical psychotic experiences in the general population.

Authors:  Manon Hanssen; Maarten Bak; Rob Bijl; Wilma Vollebergh; Jim van Os
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-06

6.  The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Carrie E Bearden; Jennifer K Johnson; Adrian Raine; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Association between duration of untreated psychosis and outcome in cohorts of first-episode patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Max Marshall; Shon Lewis; Austin Lockwood; Richard Drake; Peter Jones; Tim Croudace
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09

8.  A single blind randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy in a help-seeking population with an At Risk Mental State for psychosis: the Dutch Early Detection and Intervention Evaluation (EDIE-NL) trial.

Authors:  Judith Rietdijk; Sara Dragt; Rianne Klaassen; Helga Ising; Dorien Nieman; Lex Wunderink; Philippe Delespaul; Pim Cuijpers; Don Linszen; Mark van der Gaag
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Self-report of attenuated psychotic experiences in a college population.

Authors:  Rachel L Loewy; Jennifer K Johnson; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Prediction of psychosis. A step towards indicated prevention of schizophrenia.

Authors:  A R Yung; L J Phillips; P D McGorry; C A McFarlane; S Francey; S Harrigan; G C Patton; H J Jackson
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1998
View more
  97 in total

1.  Toward a Complex Network of Risks for Psychosis: Combining Trauma, Cognitive Biases, Depression, and Psychotic-like Experiences on a Large Sample of Young Adults.

Authors:  Łukasz Gawęda; Renata Pionke; Jessica Hartmann; Barnaby Nelson; Andrzej Cechnicki; Dorota Frydecka
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Clinical and functional characteristics of a subsample of young people presenting for primary mental healthcare at headspace services across Australia.

Authors:  K Filia; D Rickwood; J Menssink; C X Gao; S Hetrick; A Parker; M Hamilton; I Hickie; H Herrman; N Telford; S Sharmin; P McGorry; S Cotton
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Staged Treatment in Early Psychosis: A sequential multiple assignment randomised trial of interventions for ultra high risk of psychosis patients.

Authors:  Barnaby Nelson; G Paul Amminger; Hok Pan Yuen; Nicky Wallis; Melissa J Kerr; Lisa Dixon; Cameron Carter; Rachel Loewy; Tara A Niendam; Martha Shumway; Sarah Morris; Julie Blasioli; Patrick D McGorry
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Prediction and prevention of psychosis: current progress and future tasks.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Stefanie J Schmidt; Nathalie Kaiser; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Four-Year Cost-effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Preventing First-episode Psychosis: The Dutch Early Detection Intervention Evaluation (EDIE-NL) Trial.

Authors:  Helga K Ising; Joran Lokkerbol; Judith Rietdijk; Sara Dragt; Rianne M C Klaassen; Tamar Kraan; Nynke Boonstra; Dorien H Nieman; David P G van den Berg; Don H Linszen; Lex Wunderink; Wim Veling; Filip Smit; Mark van der Gaag
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.306

6.  Care Pathways Before First Diagnosis of a Psychotic Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Gregory E Simon; Christine Stewart; Enid M Hunkeler; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Frances Lynch; Karen J Coleman; Arne Beck; Belinda H Operskalski; Robert B Penfold; David S Carrell
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Psychosis risk screening in different populations using the Prodromal Questionnaire: A systematic review.

Authors:  Mark Savill; Jennifer D'Ambrosio; Tyrone D Cannon; Rachel L Loewy
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 2.732

8.  The Early Psychosis Screener (EPS): Item development and qualitative validation.

Authors:  B B Brodey; J Addington; M B First; D O Perkins; S W Woods; E F Walker; B Walsh; J M Nieri; M B Nunn; J Putz; I S Brodey
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Psychosis screening practices in schools: A survey of school-based mental health providers.

Authors:  Emily R Kline; Cole Chokran; Janine Rodenhiser-Hill; Larry J Seidman; Kristen A Woodberry
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.732

10.  The Prodromal Questionnaire: a case for IRT-based adaptive testing of psychotic experiences?

Authors:  Jan van Bebber; Johanna T W Wigman; Rob R Meijer; Helga K Ising; David van den Berg; Judith Rietdijk; Sara Dragt; Rianne Klaassen; Dorien Nieman; Peter de Jonge; Sjoerd Sytema; Marieke Wichers; Don Linszen; Mark van der Gaag; Lex Wunderink
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.