Literature DB >> 29358735

Microbial community assembly in wild populations of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Karen L Adair1, Marita Wilson1, Alyssa Bost1, Angela E Douglas2,3.   

Abstract

Animals are routinely colonized by microorganisms. Despite many studies documenting the microbial taxa associated with animals, the pattern and ecological determinants of among-animal variation in microbial communities are poorly understood. This study quantified the bacterial communities associated with natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Across five collections, each fly bore 16-78 OTUs, predominantly of the Acetobacteraceae, Lactobacillaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae. Positive relationships, mostly among related OTUs, dominated both the significant co-occurrences and co-association networks among bacteria, and OTUs with important network positions were generally of intermediate abundance and prevalence. The prevalence of most OTUs was well predicted by a neutral model suggesting that ecological drift and passive dispersal contribute significantly to microbiome composition. However, some Acetobacteraceae and Lactobacillaceae were present in more flies than predicted, indicative of superior among-fly dispersal. These taxa may be well-adapted to the Drosophila habitat from the perspective of dispersal as the principal benefit of the association to the microbial partners. Taken together, these patterns indicate that both stochastic processes and deterministic processes relating to the differential capacity for persistence in the host habitat and transmission between hosts contribute to bacterial community assembly in Drosophila melanogaster.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29358735      PMCID: PMC5864213          DOI: 10.1038/s41396-017-0020-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  54 in total

1.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Deep sequencing reveals extensive variation in the gut microbiota of wild mosquitoes from Kenya.

Authors:  J Osei-Poku; C M Mbogo; W J Palmer; F M Jiggins
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 3.  Microbial interactions: from networks to models.

Authors:  Karoline Faust; Jeroen Raes
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Probabilistic Invasion Underlies Natural Gut Microbiome Stability.

Authors:  Benjamin Obadia; Z T Güvener; Vivian Zhang; Javier A Ceja-Navarro; Eoin L Brodie; William W Ja; William B Ludington
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The inconstant gut microbiota of Drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Yeast communities of diverse Drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hosts.

Authors:  James Angus Chandler; Jonathan A Eisen; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks.

Authors:  David Berry; Stefanie Widder
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes in fecal samples reveals high diversity of hindgut microflora in horses and potential links to chronic laminitis.

Authors:  Samantha M Steelman; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Scot Dowd; Jan Suchodolski; Jan E Janečka
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Interactions between Drosophila and its natural yeast symbionts-Is Saccharomyces cerevisiae a good model for studying the fly-yeast relationship?

Authors:  Don Hoang; Artyom Kopp; James Angus Chandler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Host species and environmental effects on bacterial communities associated with Drosophila in the laboratory and in the natural environment.

Authors:  Fabian Staubach; John F Baines; Sven Künzel; Elisabeth M Bik; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Genotype to phenotype: Diet-by-mitochondrial DNA haplotype interactions drive metabolic flexibility and organismal fitness.

Authors:  Wen C Aw; Samuel G Towarnicki; Richard G Melvin; Neil A Youngson; Michael R Garvin; Yifang Hu; Shaun Nielsen; Torsten Thomas; Russell Pickford; Sonia Bustamante; Antón Vila-Sanjurjo; Gordon K Smyth; J William O Ballard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.917

2.  Bdellovibrio and Like Organisms Are Predictors of Microbiome Diversity in Distinct Host Groups.

Authors:  Julia Johnke; Sebastian Fraune; Thomas C G Bosch; Ute Hentschel; Hinrich Schulenburg
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 3.  Microbial Control of Intestinal Homeostasis via Enteroendocrine Cell Innate Immune Signaling.

Authors:  Paula I Watnick; Bat-Erdene Jugder
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 4.  The microbial exometabolome: ecological resource and architect of microbial communities.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Drosophila melanogaster establishes a species-specific mutualistic interaction with stable gut-colonizing bacteria.

Authors:  Inês S Pais; Rita S Valente; Marta Sporniak; Luis Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 6.  Multidisciplinarity in Microbiome Research: A Challenge and Opportunity to Rethink Causation, Variability, and Scale.

Authors:  Katherine R Amato; Corinne F Maurice; Karen Guillemin; Tamara Giles-Vernick
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Drosophila-associated bacteria differentially shape the nutritional requirements of their host during juvenile growth.

Authors:  Jessika Consuegra; Théodore Grenier; Patrice Baa-Puyoulet; Isabelle Rahioui; Houssam Akherraz; Hugo Gervais; Nicolas Parisot; Pedro da Silva; Hubert Charles; Federica Calevro; François Leulier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  How gut microbiome interactions affect nutritional traits of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  John G McMullen; Grace Peters-Schulze; Jingwei Cai; Andrew D Patterson; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy.

Authors:  Amber W Walters; Rachel C Hughes; Tanner B Call; Carson J Walker; Hailey Wilcox; Samara C Petersen; Seth M Rudman; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas; Paul S Schmidt; John M Chaston
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 10.  Simple animal models for microbiome research.

Authors:  Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 60.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.