Literature DB >> 28625783

Probabilistic Invasion Underlies Natural Gut Microbiome Stability.

Benjamin Obadia1, Z T Güvener1, Vivian Zhang1, Javier A Ceja-Navarro2, Eoin L Brodie3, William W Ja4, William B Ludington5.   

Abstract

Species compositions of gut microbiomes impact host health [1-3], but the processes determining these compositions are largely unknown. An unexplained observation is that gut species composition varies widely between individuals but is largely stable over time within individuals [4, 5]. Stochastic factors during establishment may drive these alternative stable states (colonized versus non-colonized) [6, 7], which can influence susceptibility to pathogens, such as Clostridium difficile. Here we sought to quantify and model the dose response, dynamics, and stability of bacterial colonization in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) gut. Our precise, high-throughput technique revealed stable between-host variation in colonization when individual germ-free flies were fed their own natural commensals (including the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum). Some flies were colonized while others remained germ-free even at extremely high bacterial doses. Thus, alternative stable states of colonization exist even in this low-complexity model of host-microbe interactions. These alternative states are driven by a fundamental asymmetry between the inoculum population and the stably colonized population that is mediated by spatial localization and a population bottleneck, which makes stochastic effects important by lowering the effective population size. Prior colonization with other bacteria reduced the chances of subsequent colonization, thus increasing the stability of higher-diversity guts. Therefore, stable gut diversity may be driven by inherently stochastic processes, which has important implications for combatting infectious diseases and for stably establishing probiotics in the gut.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila; Lactobacillus; bacterial community; colonization; gut bacteria; invasion; lottery model; microbiome; population bottleneck; stochastic assembly

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28625783      PMCID: PMC5555957          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

1.  Lactobacilli Modulate Epithelial Cytoprotection through the Nrf2 Pathway.

Authors:  Rheinallt M Jones; Chirayu Desai; Trevor M Darby; Liping Luo; Alexandra A Wolfarth; Christopher D Scharer; Courtney S Ardita; April R Reedy; Erin S Keebaugh; Andrew S Neish
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Epithelial ultrastructure and cellular mechanisms of acid and base transport in the Drosophila midgut.

Authors:  Shubha Shanbhag; Subrata Tripathi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Phylogenetic relatedness predicts priority effects in nectar yeast communities.

Authors:  Kabir G Peay; Melinda Belisle; Tadashi Fukami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genetic evidence for a protective role of the peritrophic matrix against intestinal bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Takayuki Kuraishi; Olivier Binggeli; Onya Opota; Nicolas Buchon; Bruno Lemaitre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Compartmentalized microbial composition, oxygen gradients and nitrogen fixation in the gut of Odontotaenius disjunctus.

Authors:  Javier A Ceja-Navarro; Nhu H Nguyen; Ulas Karaoz; Stephanie R Gross; Donald J Herman; Gary L Andersen; Thomas D Bruns; Jennifer Pett-Ridge; Meredith Blackwell; Eoin L Brodie
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 6.  The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease.

Authors:  June L Round; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 53.106

7.  Moving pictures of the human microbiome.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Christian L Lauber; Elizabeth K Costello; Donna Berg-Lyons; Antonio Gonzalez; Jesse Stombaugh; Dan Knights; Pawel Gajer; Jacques Ravel; Noah Fierer; Jeffrey I Gordon; Rob Knight
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Host lifestyle affects human microbiota on daily timescales.

Authors:  Lawrence A David; Arne C Materna; Jonathan Friedman; Maria I Campos-Baptista; Matthew C Blackburn; Allison Perrotta; Susan E Erdman; Eric J Alm
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota.

Authors:  S Melanie Lee; Gregory P Donaldson; Zbigniew Mikulski; Silva Boyajian; Klaus Ley; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Stochastic assembly produces heterogeneous communities in the Caenorhabditis elegans intestine.

Authors:  Nicole M Vega; Jeff Gore
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  53 in total

1.  Reply to Obadia et al.: Effect of methyl paraben on host-microbiota interactions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Philip T Leftwich; Naomi V E Clarke; Matthew I Hutchings; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Diet influences host-microbiota associations in Drosophila.

Authors:  Benjamin Obadia; Erin S Keebaugh; Ryuichi Yamada; William B Ludington; William W Ja
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Commensal pathogen competition impacts host viability.

Authors:  David Fast; Benjamin Kostiuk; Edan Foley; Stefan Pukatzki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Drosophila melanogaster establishes a species-specific mutualistic interaction with stable gut-colonizing bacteria.

Authors:  Inês S Pais; Rita S Valente; Marta Sporniak; Luis Teixeira
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Microbial community assembly in wild populations of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Karen L Adair; Marita Wilson; Alyssa Bost; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Evolutionary and ecological consequences of gut microbial communities.

Authors:  Nancy A Moran; Howard Ochman; Tobin J Hammer
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 13.915

7.  Drosophila-associated bacteria differentially shape the nutritional requirements of their host during juvenile growth.

Authors:  Jessika Consuegra; Théodore Grenier; Patrice Baa-Puyoulet; Isabelle Rahioui; Houssam Akherraz; Hugo Gervais; Nicolas Parisot; Pedro da Silva; Hubert Charles; Federica Calevro; François Leulier
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 8.  Microbiomes as modulators of Drosophila melanogaster homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Danielle Na Lesperance; Nichole A Broderick
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.186

9.  Bacterial Methionine Metabolism Genes Influence Drosophila melanogaster Starvation Resistance.

Authors:  Alec M Judd; Melinda K Matthews; Rachel Hughes; Madeline Veloz; Corinne E Sexton; John M Chaston
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The microbiota influences the Drosophila melanogaster life history strategy.

Authors:  Amber W Walters; Rachel C Hughes; Tanner B Call; Carson J Walker; Hailey Wilcox; Samara C Petersen; Seth M Rudman; Peter D Newell; Angela E Douglas; Paul S Schmidt; John M Chaston
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 6.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.