Antoine Vieillard-Baron1,2,3, Bruno Evrard4,5, Xavier Repessé6, Julien Maizel7, Christophe Jacob8, Marine Goudelin4,5, Cyril Charron6, Gwenaël Prat8, Michel Slama7, Guillaume Geri6,9,10, Philippe Vignon4,5,11. 1. Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. antoine.vieillard-baron@aphp.fr. 2. INSERM U-1018, CESP, Team 5, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Villejuif, France. antoine.vieillard-baron@aphp.fr. 3. Faculty of Medicine Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Saint-Quentin En Yvelines, Villejuif, France. antoine.vieillard-baron@aphp.fr. 4. Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France. 5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 6. Intensive Care Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. 7. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France. 8. Medical Intensive Care Unit, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France. 9. INSERM U-1018, CESP, Team 5, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Villejuif, France. 10. Faculty of Medicine Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin en Yvelines, Saint-Quentin En Yvelines, Villejuif, France. 11. INSERM CIC 1435, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We sought to determine the diagnostic ability of the end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter (IVCEE) to predict fluid responsiveness (FR) and the potential confounding effect of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). METHODS: In this multicenter study, 540 consecutive ventilated patients with shock of various origins underwent an echocardiographic assessment by experts. The IVCEE, velocity time integral (VTI) of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) were measured. Passive leg raising (PLR) was then systematically used to perform a reversible central blood volume expansion. FR was defined by an increase in LVOT VTI ≥ 10% after 1 min of PLR. RESULTS: Since IVCEE was not obtained in 117 patients (22%), 423 were studied (septic shock: 56%), 129 of them (30%) having elevated IAP (≥ 12 mmHg) and 172 of them (41%) exhibiting FR. IVCEE ≤ 13 mm predicted FR with a specificity of at least 80% in 62 patients (15%), while IVCEE ≥ 25 mm predicted the absence of FR with a specificity of at least 80% in 61 patients (14%). In the remaining 300 patients (71%), the intermediate value of IVCEE did not allow predicting FR. An adjusted relationship between IVCEE and FR was observed while this relationship was less pronounced in patients with IAP ≥ 12 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IVCEE in ventilated patients is moderately feasible and poorly predicts FR, with IAP acting as a confounding factor. IVCEE might add some value to guide fluid therapy but should not be used alone for fluid prediction purposes.
PURPOSE: We sought to determine the diagnostic ability of the end-expiratory inferior vena cava diameter (IVCEE) to predict fluid responsiveness (FR) and the potential confounding effect of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). METHODS: In this multicenter study, 540 consecutive ventilated patients with shock of various origins underwent an echocardiographic assessment by experts. The IVCEE, velocity time integral (VTI) of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) were measured. Passive leg raising (PLR) was then systematically used to perform a reversible central blood volume expansion. FR was defined by an increase in LVOT VTI ≥ 10% after 1 min of PLR. RESULTS: Since IVCEE was not obtained in 117 patients (22%), 423 were studied (septic shock: 56%), 129 of them (30%) having elevated IAP (≥ 12 mmHg) and 172 of them (41%) exhibiting FR. IVCEE ≤ 13 mm predicted FR with a specificity of at least 80% in 62 patients (15%), while IVCEE ≥ 25 mm predicted the absence of FR with a specificity of at least 80% in 61 patients (14%). In the remaining 300 patients (71%), the intermediate value of IVCEE did not allow predicting FR. An adjusted relationship between IVCEE and FR was observed while this relationship was less pronounced in patients with IAP ≥ 12 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IVCEE in ventilated patients is moderately feasible and poorly predicts FR, with IAP acting as a confounding factor. IVCEE might add some value to guide fluid therapy but should not be used alone for fluid prediction purposes.
Authors: Paul H Mayo; Yannick Beaulieu; Peter Doelken; David Feller-Kopman; Christopher Harrod; Adolfo Kaplan; John Oropello; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Olivier Axler; Daniel Lichtenstein; Eric Maury; Michel Slama; Philippe Vignon Journal: Chest Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: M L N G Malbrain; D Chiumello; B M Cesana; A Reintam Blaser; J Starkopf; M Sugrue; P Pelosi; P Severgnini; G Hernandez; N Brienza; A W Kirkpatrick; A Schachtrupp; J Kempchen; E Estenssoro; M G Vidal; I De Laet; B L De Keulenaer Journal: Minerva Anestesiol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: J Matthew Fields; Paul A Lee; Katherine Y Jenq; Dustin G Mark; Nova L Panebianco; Anthony J Dean Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Xavier Monnet; Mario Rienzo; David Osman; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Michael R Pinsky; Jean-Louis Teboul Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Massimo Antonelli; Richard Beale; Jan Bakker; Christoph Hofer; Roman Jaeschke; Alexandre Mebazaa; Michael R Pinsky; Jean Louis Teboul; Jean Louis Vincent; Andrew Rhodes Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: R F Trauzeddel; M Nordine; H V Groesdonk; G Michels; R Pfister; D A Reuter; T W L Scheeren; C Berger; S Treskatsch Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Anders Perner; Maurizio Cecconi; Maria Cronhjort; Michael Darmon; Stephan M Jakob; Ville Pettilä; Iwan C C van der Horst Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Antoine Vieillard-Baron; R Naeije; F Haddad; H J Bogaard; T M Bull; N Fletcher; T Lahm; S Magder; S Orde; G Schmidt; M R Pinsky Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: R F Trauzeddel; M Ertmer; M Nordine; H V Groesdonk; G Michels; R Pfister; D Reuter; T W L Scheeren; C Berger; S Treskatsch Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Thomas Lafon; Alexandra Appert; Mathilde Hadj; Vincent Bigrat; Vincent Legarcon; Paul Claveries; Marine Goudelin; Bruno Evrard; Ana Catalina Hernandez Padilla; Arthur Baisse; Philippe Vignon Journal: Shock Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.533