Literature DB >> 29352419

A Systematic Review of Interventions to Follow-Up Test Results Pending at Discharge.

Patrick J Darragh1,2, T Bodley3, A Orchanian-Cheff4, K G Shojania3, J L Kwan3, P Cram3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients are frequently discharged from the hospital before all test results have been finalized. Thirty to 40% of tests pending at discharge (TPADs) return potentially actionable results that could necessitate change in the patients' management, often unbeknownst to their physicians. Delayed follow-up of TPADs can lead to patient harm. We sought to synthesize the existing literature on interventions intended to improve the management of TPADs, including interventions designed to enhance documentation of TPADs, increase physician awareness when TPAD results finalize post-discharge, decrease adverse events related to missed TPADs, and increase physician satisfaction with TPAD management.
METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Controlled Clinical Trials and Medline (January 1, 2000-November 10, 2016) for randomized controlled trials and prospective, controlled observational studies that evaluated interventions to improve follow-up of TPADs for adult patients discharged from acute care hospitals or emergency department settings. From each study we extracted characteristics of the intervention being evaluated and its impact on TPAD management.
RESULTS: Nine studies met the criteria for inclusion. Six studies evaluated electronic discharge summary templates with a designated field for documenting TPADs, and three of six of these studies reported a significant improvement in documentation of TPADs in discharge summaries in pre- and post-intervention analysis. One study reported that auditing discharge summaries and providing feedback to physicians were associated with improved TPAD documentation in discharge summaries. Two studies found that email alerts when TPADs were finalized improved physicians' awareness of the results and documentation of their follow-up actions. Of the four studies that assessed patient morbidity, two showed a positive effect; however, none specifically measured the impact of their interventions on downstream patient harm due to delayed follow-up of TPADs. Three studies surveyed physicians' attitudes towards the interventions, of which two studies reported improved physician satisfaction with TPAD management with the implementation of an enhanced discharge template and a notification system when TPADs finalize. DISCUSSION: Discharge summary templates, educational interventions for discharging physicians, and email alerts when TPAD results are finalized show promise in improving management of TPADs. Given the complexity of the processes necessary to ensure follow-up of TPADs, rigorous evaluations of multifaceted interventions (e.g., improved discharge documentation of TPADs combined with email alerts when results become available) is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; hospital medicine; patient discharge

Year:  2018        PMID: 29352419      PMCID: PMC5910344          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-017-4290-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  22 in total

1.  Impact of automated alerts on follow-up of post-discharge microbiology results: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Christopher Roy; Deborah H Williams; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Using computerized provider order entry to enforce documentation of tests with pending results at hospital discharge.

Authors:  J Cadwallader; C Asirwa; X Li; J Kesterson; W M Tierney; M C Were
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Impact of an automated email notification system for results of tests pending at discharge: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anuj K Dalal; Christopher L Roy; Eric G Poon; Deborah H Williams; Nyryan Nolido; Cathy Yoon; Jonas Budris; Tejal Gandhi; David W Bates; Jeffrey L Schnipper
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Reducing missed laboratory results: defining temporal responsibility, generating user interfaces for test process tracking, and retrospective analyses to identify problems.

Authors:  Sureyya Tarkan; Catherine Plaisant; Ben Shneiderman; A Zachary Hettinger
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

5.  Audit and feedback: an intervention to improve discharge summary completion.

Authors:  Anca Dinescu; Helen Fernandez; Joseph S Ross; Reena Karani
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: methods of a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  R Brian Haynes; Nancy L Wilczynski
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Creating a better discharge summary: improvement in quality and timeliness using an electronic discharge summary.

Authors:  Kevin J O'Leary; David M Liebovitz; Joseph Feinglass; David T Liss; Daniel B Evans; Nita Kulkarni; Matthew P Landler; David W Baker
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.960

8.  Patient readmissions, emergency visits, and adverse events after software-assisted discharge from hospital: cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  James F Graumlich; Nancy L Novotny; G Stephen Nace; Himangi Kaushal; Waleed Ibrahim-Ali; Shoba Theivanayagam; L William Scheibel; Jean C Aldag
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network.

Authors:  J Hickner; D G Graham; N C Elder; E Brandt; C B Emsermann; S Dovey; R Phillips
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-06

Review 10.  Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review.

Authors:  Pavel S Roshanov; Shikha Misra; Hertzel C Gerstein; Amit X Garg; Rolf J Sebaldt; Jean A Mackay; Lorraine Weise-Kelly; Tamara Navarro; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  8 in total

1.  Test Result Management Practices of Canadian Internal Medicine Physicians and Trainees.

Authors:  Thomas Bodley; Janice L Kwan; John Matelski; Patrick J Darragh; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Improving the quality of discharge summaries through a direct feedback system.

Authors:  Charles H Earnshaw; Amanda Pedersen; Jo Evans; Tina Cross; Olivier Gaillemin; Arturo Vilches-Moraga
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2020-06

3.  Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps.

Authors:  Andrew J Zimolzak; Umber Shahid; Traber D Giardina; Sahar A Memon; Umair Mushtaq; Lisa Zubkoff; Daniel R Murphy; Andrea Bradford; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Variation in electronic test results management and its implications for patient safety: A multisite investigation.

Authors:  Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Julie Li; Peter Smith; Jacqui Irvine; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  The impact of health information technology on the management and follow-up of test results - a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Self-reported test ordering practices among Canadian internal medicine physicians and trainees: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Thomas Bodley; Janice L Kwan; John Matelski; Patrick J Darragh; Peter Cram
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Current state of laboratory test utilization practices in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Grace M Kroner; Sandy Richman; Andrew Fletcher; Jane Dickerson; Brian R Jackson
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 8.  Closing the loop on test results to reduce communication failures: a rapid review of evidence, practice and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Breanna Wright; Alyse Lennox; Mark L Graber; Peter Bragge
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.