Literature DB >> 30298242

Test Result Management Practices of Canadian Internal Medicine Physicians and Trainees.

Thomas Bodley1, Janice L Kwan2,3, John Matelski3, Patrick J Darragh2,4, Peter Cram2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Missed test results are a cause of medical error. Few studies have explored test result management in the inpatient setting.
OBJECTIVE: To examine test result management practices of general internal medicine providers in the inpatient setting, examine satisfaction with practices, and quantify self-reported delays in result follow-up.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. PARTICIPANTS: General internal medicine attending physicians and trainees (residents and medical students) at three Canadian teaching hospitals. MAIN MEASURES: Methods used to track test results; satisfaction with these methods; personal encounters with results respondents "wish they had known about sooner." KEY
RESULTS: We received surveys from 33/51 attendings and 99/108 trainees (response rate 83%). Only 40.9% of respondents kept a record of all tests they order, and 50.0% had a system to ensure ordered tests were completed. Methods for tracking test results included typed team sign-out lists (40.7%), electronic health record (EHR) functionality (e.g., the electronic "inbox") (38.9%), and personal written or typed lists (14.8%). Almost all trainees (97.9%) and attendings (81.2%) reported encountering at least one test result they "wish they had known about sooner" in the past 2 months (p = 0.001). A higher percentage of attendings kept a record of tests pending at hospital discharge compared to trainees (75.0% vs. 35.7%, p < 0.001), used EHR functionality to track tests (71.4% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.004), and reported higher satisfaction with result management (42.4% vs. 12.1% satisfied or very satisfied, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Canadian physicians report an array of problems managing test results in the inpatient setting. In the context of prior studies from the outpatient setting, our study suggests a need to develop interventions to prevent missed results and avoid potential patient harms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  care transitions; electronic health records; hospital medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298242      PMCID: PMC6318178          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4656-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  40 in total

1.  U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries.

Authors:  David Squires; Chloe Anderson
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2015-10

2.  Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Aanand Dinkar Naik; Raghuram Rao; Laura Ann Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Regionalization Does Not Equal Integration.

Authors:  Adalsteinn D Brown; Peter W T Pisters; C David Naylor
Journal:  Healthc Pap       Date:  2016

4.  Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology.

Authors:  D W Bates; M Cohen; L L Leape; J M Overhage; M M Shabot; T Sheridan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Incidence and predictors of microbiology results returning postdischarge and requiring follow-up.

Authors:  Robert El-Kareh; Christopher Roy; Gregor Brodsky; Molly Perencevich; Eric G Poon
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.960

6.  Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Christopher L Roy; Eric G Poon; Andrew S Karson; Zahra Ladak-Merchant; Robin E Johnson; Saverio M Maviglia; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Patient safety is not elective: a debate at the NPSF Patient Safety Congress.

Authors:  Patricia McTiernan; Robert M Wachter; Gregg S Meyer; Tejal K Gandhi
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 8.  The detection and prevention of errors in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Mario Plebani
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.057

9.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Eldon R Mahoney; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Routine failures in the process for blood testing and the communication of results to patients in primary care in the UK: a qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Louise Bentham; Ann Hill; Richard J McManus; Richard Lilford; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.035

View more
  2 in total

1.  Variation in electronic test results management and its implications for patient safety: A multisite investigation.

Authors:  Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Julie Li; Peter Smith; Jacqui Irvine; Johanna I Westbrook; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A systematic review of evidence-based practices for clinical education and health care delivery in the clinical teaching unit.

Authors:  Brandon Tang; Ryan Sandarage; Jocelyn Chai; Kristin Anne Dawson; Katrina Rose Dutkiewicz; Stephan Saad; Vanessa Kitchin; Rose Hatala; Iain McCormick; Barry Kassen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.