Andrew J Zimolzak1,2, Umber Shahid1,2, Traber D Giardina1,2, Sahar A Memon1,2, Umair Mushtaq1,2, Lisa Zubkoff3, Daniel R Murphy1,2, Andrea Bradford1,2, Hardeep Singh4,5. 1. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard 152, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Birmingham/Atlanta VA GRECC, and Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard 152, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. hardeeps@bcm.edu. 5. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. hardeeps@bcm.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results is common and has been implicated in missed or delayed diagnosis, resulting in potential for patient harm. OBJECTIVE: As part of a larger project to implement change strategies to improve follow-up of diagnostic test results, this study sought to identify specifically where implementation gaps exist, as well as possible solutions identified by front-line staff. DESIGN: We used a semi-structured interview guide to collect qualitative data from Veterans Affairs (VA) facility staff who had experience with test results management and patient safety. SETTING: Twelve VA facilities across the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Facility staff members (n = 27), including clinicians, lab and imaging professionals, nursing staff, patient safety professionals, and leadership. APPROACH: We conducted a content analysis of interview transcripts to identify perceived barriers and high-risk areas for effective test result management, as well as recommendations for improvement. RESULTS: We identified seven themes to guide further development of interventions to improve test result follow-up. Themes related to trainees, incidental findings, tracking systems for electronic health record notifications, outdated contact information, referrals, backup or covering providers, and responsibility for test results pending at discharge. Participants provided recommendations for improvement within each theme. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived barriers and recommendations for improving test result follow-up often reflected previously known problems and their corresponding solutions, which have not been consistently implemented in practice. Better policy solutions and improvement methods, such as quality improvement collaboratives, may bridge the implementation gaps between knowledge and practice.
BACKGROUND: Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal test results is common and has been implicated in missed or delayed diagnosis, resulting in potential for patient harm. OBJECTIVE: As part of a larger project to implement change strategies to improve follow-up of diagnostic test results, this study sought to identify specifically where implementation gaps exist, as well as possible solutions identified by front-line staff. DESIGN: We used a semi-structured interview guide to collect qualitative data from Veterans Affairs (VA) facility staff who had experience with test results management and patient safety. SETTING: Twelve VA facilities across the USA. PARTICIPANTS: Facility staff members (n = 27), including clinicians, lab and imaging professionals, nursing staff, patient safety professionals, and leadership. APPROACH: We conducted a content analysis of interview transcripts to identify perceived barriers and high-risk areas for effective test result management, as well as recommendations for improvement. RESULTS: We identified seven themes to guide further development of interventions to improve test result follow-up. Themes related to trainees, incidental findings, tracking systems for electronic health record notifications, outdated contact information, referrals, backup or covering providers, and responsibility for test results pending at discharge. Participants provided recommendations for improvement within each theme. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived barriers and recommendations for improving test result follow-up often reflected previously known problems and their corresponding solutions, which have not been consistently implemented in practice. Better policy solutions and improvement methods, such as quality improvement collaboratives, may bridge the implementation gaps between knowledge and practice.
Authors: Lisa Zubkoff; Julia Neily; Pat Quigley; Christina Soncrant; Yinong Young-Xu; Shoshana Boar; Peter D Mills Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2016-11-09
Authors: Borsika A Rabin; Ross C Brownson; Debra Haire-Joshu; Matthew W Kreuter; Nancy L Weaver Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2008 Mar-Apr
Authors: Sylvia J Hysong; Mona K Sawhney; Lindsay Wilson; Dean F Sittig; Donna Espadas; Traber Davis; Hardeep Singh Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Patrick J Darragh; T Bodley; A Orchanian-Cheff; K G Shojania; J L Kwan; P Cram Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nedra S Whitehead; Laurina Williams; Sreelatha Meleth; Sara Kennedy; Paul Epner; Hardeep Singh; Kathleene Wooldridge; Anuj K Dalal; Stacy E Walz; Tom Lorey; Mark L Graber Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 2.899
Authors: Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm; Johanna I Westbrook Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: April Savoy; Himalaya Patel; Umber Shahid; Alexis D Offner; Hardeep Singh; Traber D Giardina; Ashley N D Meyer Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2022-09-22