| Literature DB >> 29348587 |
Ming Liao1,2, Yuanliang Xie3,2, Yan Mao4, Zheng Lu3,2,5, Aihua Tan3,2, Chunlei Wu6, Zhifu Zhang7, Yang Chen3,8, Tianyu Li3,2,5, Yu Ye3,8,9, Ziting Yao3,2, Yonghua Jiang3,2, Hongzhe Li10, Xiaoming Li11, Xiaobo Yang3,2, Qiuyan Wang3,2, Zengnan Mo12,13.
Abstract
The gut microbiome in humans is associated with geography, diet, lifestyles and so on, but its relationship with some isolated populations is not clear. We used the 16sRNA technique to sequence the fecal microbiome in the Chinese isolated Yao population and compared it with the major minority Zhuang and the major ethnic Han populations living in the same rural area. Information about diet frequency and health status and routine serum measurements were collected. The unweighted UniFrac principal coordinates analysis showed significant structural differences in fecal microbiota among the three ethnic groups. Statistically significant differences were observed in the community richness estimator (chaos) and the diversity estimator (Shannon) among the three groups. At the genus level, the fecal samples of the isolated Yao population presented the lowest relative abundance of the Megamonas genus, which was potentially related to the high frequency of bean consumption in the diet. Two enterotypes were identified in the overall fecal microbiota in the three populations. In the isolated Yao population, a higher Bacteroides abundance was observed, but the Prevotella abundance decreased with increased alcohol consumption.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29348587 PMCID: PMC5773753 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17851-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the included samples*.
| Han | Zhuang | Yao | P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 47 | 28 | 59 | ||||
| Male | 14 | (29.8%) | 14 | (50%) | 25 | (42.4%) | 0.110 |
| Age (yr) | 50.0 | (42.5–59.5) | 55.5 | (48.3–62.5) | 44.0 | (34.0–51.0) | 0.007 |
| BMI | 23.6 | (21.0–25.7) | 22.9 | (19.9–23.9) | 21.3 | (20.0–23.5) | 0.030 |
| weight (kg) | 58.2 | (51.4–66.5) | 58.5 | (49.5–63.3) | 49.1 | (45.8–54.8) | <0.001 |
| height (cm) | 157 | (154–164) | 158 | (153–164) | 152 | (147–157) | <0.001 |
| alcohol consumption | 0.654 | ||||||
| Never | 30 | (63.8%) | 18 | (64.3%) | 32 | (54.2%) | |
| Former | 4 | (8.5%) | 1 | (3.6%) | 4 | (6.8%) | |
| Current | 12 | (25.5%) | 7 | (25%) | 22 | (37.3%) | |
| cigarret smoking | 0.461 | ||||||
| Never | 37 | (78.7%) | 17 | (60.7%) | 39 | (66.1%) | |
| Former | 2 | (4.3%) | 1 | (3.6%) | 0 | (0%) | |
| Current | 7 | (14.9%) | 4 | (14.3%) | 12 | (20.3%) | |
| physical activity | 0.125 | ||||||
| > = 4 h/d | 18 | (38.3%) | 13 | (46.4%) | 16 | (27.1%) | |
| <4 h/d | 25 | (53.2%) | 12 | (42.9%) | 39 | (66.1%) | |
| dietary habits | |||||||
| have regular meals | 42 | (89.36%) | 25 | (89.29%) | 49 | (83.05%) | 0.716 |
| have regular breakfast | 40 | (85.11%) | 27 | (96.43%) | 58 | (98.31%) | 0.020 |
| drink unboiled water | 19 | (40.43%) | 16 | (57.14%) | 31 | (52.54%) | 0.008 |
| wash hands before meals | 41 | (87.23%) | 17 | (60.71%) | 49 | (83.05%) | 0.013 |
| wash teeth regularly | 45 | (95.74%) | 28 | (100%) | 52 | (88.14%) | 0.110 |
| prevalent taste | |||||||
| salty | 42 | (89.36%) | 24 | (85.71%) | 45 | (76.27%) | 0.233 |
| spicy | 42 | (89.36%) | 27 | (96.43%) | 54 | (91.53%) | 0.600 |
| sugary | 42 | (89.36%) | 24 | (85.71%) | 56 | (94.92%) | 0.353 |
*Continual variables were present as median values (25–75th percentile) and p was calculated by Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test, whereas categorical variables were present as frequencies and proportions, and p was calculated by Fisher’s exact test.
Figure 1The analysis of alpha-diversity (Chao1 index) and beta-diversity (unweighted Unifrac) in the three ethnic groups. (a) The chao1 index at the 4200 sequences per sample in the rarefaction curve; P was calculated from the analysis of variance. (b) The unweighted UniFrac; P was calculated from the permutational multivariate analysis of variance.
Figure 2The relative abundance of detected genera in the three ethnic groups. (a) The pattern of median values of genus abundance in the three ethnic groups. (b) The relative abundance of two significant genera; p was calculated from the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test.
Figure 3The LEfSe results of the Tu Yao and Han groups. (a) The linear discriminant analysis. (b) The cladograms report. Prefixes represent abbreviations for the taxonomic rank of each taxa: phylum (p__), class (c__), etc.
Figure 4The dietary frequencies in the three ethnic groups. (a) The dietary patterns of 21 specific foods in the three ethnic groups; *Indicates p < 0.05 from Fisher’s exact test, #Indicates p < 0.05 after bonferroni adjustments. (b) The association of bean consumption frequency with two significant genera; p was calculated from the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test.
Figure 5The significant serum biomarkers in the three ethnic groups. (a) The distribution pattern of serum biomarkers in the three ethnic groups. Both rows and columns were clustered by Euclidean distance, and the serum levels of biomarkers were normalized by z-scores. MPV: mean platelet volume, PLCR: platelet to large cell ratio, MCV: mean cell volume, MCH: mean cell hemoglobin, RDWSD: red cell distribution width - standard deviation, HCY: homocysteine, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, C3: complements 3, C4: complements 4, IgM: immunoglobulin M, FT4: free thyroxin, ALB: albumin, AG: albumin to globulin ration, TBIL: total bilirubin, DBIL: direct bilirubin. (b) The association between the serum levels of the three types of bilirubin and the log relative abundance of the Megamonas genus; p was calculated from the Spearman correlation analysis. TBIL: total bilirubin (p = ,0.0009 adjusted R-squared = 0.083), IBIL: indirect bilirubin (p = 0.0082, adjusted R-squared = 0.050), DBIL: direct bilirubin (p = 0.0004, adjusted R-squared = 0.094).
Figure 6Two common bacteria were associated with alcohol consumption. (a) Clustering using the Jensen-Shannon distance in the gut microbiota composition determined by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. The left panel shows that the data are naturally separated into two clusters by the PAM method. The x-axis shows the cluster number; the y-axis shows silhouette width, a measure of cluster separation. The right panel shows the clustering on the two results from the multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis. (b) The relative abundance of common bacteria in each enterotype. Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR), and the line inside represents the median. Whiskers denote the lowest and highest values within 1.5 × IQR. (c) The association between alcohol consumption and the relative abundance of the two common bacteria in the enterotypes in the three ethnic groups; p was calculated from the Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum test.