Frank Fischbach1, Lukas Wien2, Sascha Krueger3, Bernhard Schnackenburg3, Daniel Baumunk4, Björn Friebe2, Martin Schostak4, Jens Ricke2, Katharina Fischbach2. 1. Department of Radiology, Otto von Guericke University, Medical School, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. frank.fischbach@med.ovgu.de. 2. Department of Radiology, Otto von Guericke University, Medical School, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. 3. Philips Healthcare, Philips GmbH Innovative Technologies, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Department of Urology, Otto von Guericke University, Medical School, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was (1) to establish an in-bore targeted biopsy of suspicious prostate lesions, avoiding bowel penetration using a transgluteal approach and (2) to assess operator setup, patient comfort and safety aspects in the clinical setting for freehand real-time MR-guidance established for percutaneous procedures in an open MR-scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients with suspect prostate lesions were biopsied in a cylindrical 3T-MRI system using a transgluteal approach in freehand technique. One to three biopsies were sampled using continuous dynamic imaging. Size, location and visibility of the lesion, intervention time, needle artefact size, interventional complications and histopathological diagnosis were recorded. RESULTS: All biopsies were technically successful. Nineteen patients showed evidence of prostate carcinoma. Cancer detection rate was 50 % in patients with previously negative TRUS-biopsy. The average intervention time was 26 min including a learning curve as the time was 13 min by the end of the study. No antibiotic prophylaxis was performed as none of the patients showed signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided targeted freehand biopsies of prostate lesions using a transgluteal approach are both technically feasible and time efficient in a standard closed-bore 3T-MR scanner as well as safe for the individual patient. KEY POINTS: • Open-bore freehand interventional principles were adapted to closed-bore systems. • Prostate MR-guided freehand biopsies were feasible in a clinical setting. • A transgluteal approach provides a short and simplified work flow. • An inoculation of the prostate with bowel flora is avoided. • The intervention time is comparable to the stereotactic approach.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was (1) to establish an in-bore targeted biopsy of suspicious prostate lesions, avoiding bowel penetration using a transgluteal approach and (2) to assess operator setup, patient comfort and safety aspects in the clinical setting for freehand real-time MR-guidance established for percutaneous procedures in an open MR-scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 patients with suspect prostate lesions were biopsied in a cylindrical 3T-MRI system using a transgluteal approach in freehand technique. One to three biopsies were sampled using continuous dynamic imaging. Size, location and visibility of the lesion, intervention time, needle artefact size, interventional complications and histopathological diagnosis were recorded. RESULTS: All biopsies were technically successful. Nineteen patients showed evidence of prostate carcinoma. Cancer detection rate was 50 % in patients with previously negative TRUS-biopsy. The average intervention time was 26 min including a learning curve as the time was 13 min by the end of the study. No antibiotic prophylaxis was performed as none of the patients showed signs of infection. CONCLUSIONS: MR-guided targeted freehand biopsies of prostate lesions using a transgluteal approach are both technically feasible and time efficient in a standard closed-bore 3T-MR scanner as well as safe for the individual patient. KEY POINTS: • Open-bore freehand interventional principles were adapted to closed-bore systems. • Prostate MR-guided freehand biopsies were feasible in a clinical setting. • A transgluteal approach provides a short and simplified work flow. • An inoculation of the prostate with bowel flora is avoided. • The intervention time is comparable to the stereotactic approach.
Authors: Frank Fischbach; Markus Porsch; Felix Krenzien; Maciej Pech; Oliver Dudeck; Jürgen Bunke; Uwe-Bernd Liehr; Jens Ricke Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Felix K-H Chun; Thomas Steuber; Andreas Erbersdobler; Eike Currlin; Jochen Walz; Thorsten Schlomm; Alexander Haese; Hans Heinzer; Michael McCormack; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: H A Vargas; A M Hötker; D A Goldman; C S Moskowitz; T Gondo; K Matsumoto; B Ehdaie; S Woo; S W Fine; V E Reuter; E Sala; H Hricak Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Dirk Blondin; Michael Quentin; Andreas Hiester; Erhard Godehardt; Helmut E Gabbert; Nikolaus Becker; Gerald Antoch; Peter Albers; Lars Schimmöller Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ivo G Schoots; Monique J Roobol; Daan Nieboer; Chris H Bangma; Ewout W Steyerberg; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-12-03 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Gabriel P Haas; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Richard F Jones; Vishal Chandan; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Mary Jumbelic; Gregory Threatte; Rus Korets; Hans Lilja; Gustavo de la Roza Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2007-09-25 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: M Quentin; C Arsov; T Ullrich; B Valentin; A Hiester; D Blondin; P Albers; G Antoch; L Schimmöller Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Frank Fischbach; Peter Hass; Daniel Schindele; Philipp Genseke; Lisa Geisendorf; Christian Stehning; Martin Schostak; Thomas Brunner; Maciej Pech; Katharina Fischbach Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 5.315