Literature DB >> 16439050

Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.

Felix K-H Chun1, Thomas Steuber, Andreas Erbersdobler, Eike Currlin, Jochen Walz, Thorsten Schlomm, Alexander Haese, Hans Heinzer, Michael McCormack, Hartwig Huland, Markus Graefen, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports indicate that as many as 43% of men with low grade PCa at biopsy will be diagnosed with high-grade PCa at RP. We explored the rate of upgrading from biopsy to RP specimen in our contemporary cohort, and developed a model capable of predicting the probability of biopsy Gleason sum upgrading.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 2982 men treated with RP, with available clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and biopsy Gleason scores. These clinical data were used as predictors in multivariate logistic regression models (LRM) addressing the rate of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and RP pathology. LRM regression coefficients were used to develop a nomogram predicting the probability of Gleason sum upgrading and was subjected to 200 bootstrap resamples for internal validation and to reduce overfit bias.
RESULTS: Overall, 875 patients were upgraded (29.3%). In multivariate LRMs, all predictors were highly significant (all p values <0.0001). Bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy of the nomogram predicting the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and RP was 0.804.
CONCLUSION: We developed a highly accurate clinical aid for treatment decision-making. It may prove useful when the possibility of a more aggressive Gleason variant may change the treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16439050     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  43 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic models in radical prostatectomy candidates: a critical analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Michael W Kattan; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 2.  Role of nomograms for prostate cancer in 2007.

Authors:  Felix K-H Chun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The influence of expertise of the surgical pathologist to undergrading, upgrading, and understaging of prostate cancer in patients undergoing subsequent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Attila Majoros; Attila Marcell Szász; Péter Nyirády; Eszter Székely; Péter Riesz; Attila Szendrői; Attila Keszthelyi; Janina Kulka; Imre Romics
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Predictive models for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

5.  Validation of Epstein criteria of insignificant prostate cancer in Middle East patients.

Authors:  Ihab A Hekal; Nasr A El-Tabey; Mohamed Adel Nabeeh; Ahmed El-Assmy; Mohamed Abd El-Hameed; Adel Nabeeh; Elhousseiny I Ibrahiem
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 6.  Prostate cancer in 2010: GSU: misclassification or biological progression?

Authors:  Umberto Capitanio; Nazareno Suardi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy decreases detection of indolent cancer in African-American men.

Authors:  M Kongnyuy; M M Siddiqui; A K George; A Muthigi; A Sidana; M Maruf; B Turkbey; P L Choyke; B J Wood; P A Pinto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 8.  Formalized prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer: is it possible?

Authors:  Carvell T Nguyen; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Urotensin II receptor on preoperative biopsy is associated with upstaging and upgrading in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ottavio De Cobelli; Carlo Buonerba; Daniela Terracciano; Danilo Bottero; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Pierluigi Bove; Vincenzo Altieri; Ioman Coman; Sisto Perdonà; Gaetano Facchini; Massimiliano Berretta; Giuseppe Di Lorenzo; Paolo Grieco; Ettore Novellino; Renato Franco; Michele Caraglia; Claudia Manini; Vincenzo Mirone; Sabino De Placido; Guru Sonpavde; Matteo Ferro
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.404

Review 10.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.