Literature DB >> 31250168

Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy.

M Quentin1, C Arsov2, T Ullrich1, B Valentin1, A Hiester2, D Blondin1, P Albers2, G Antoch1, L Schimmöller3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy (IB-GB) regarding the influence on patient procedural experience of pain.
METHODS: Two hundred fifty-two consecutive patients who had received an IB-GB either with intrarectal instillation of 2% lidocaine gel (n = 126, group A) or with periprostatic nerve block (PPNB) with 2% mepivacaine (n = 126, group B) were retrospectively included in this study. Pain scores were measured on a visual analog scale, the operating room time (ORT) was recorded for each biopsy and correlations between the parameters were analysed.
RESULTS: Pain scores for IB-GB were slightly lower in group B compared with group A (2.0 ± 1.9; 2.4 ± 1.7; p = 0.02). In group A, significantly more targeted biopsy cores were acquired (group B: 5.2 ± 1.1; group A: 5.6 ± 0.8; p < 0.01). ORT was comparable and not significantly different in both groups. There was only a weak correlation between pain scores and ORT in group B (rS = 0.22; p = 0.01), but no correlation between pain scores and the number of biopsy cores or the prostate volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Pain levels are generally low for MRI-guided in-bore biopsy using either PPNB or intrarectal instillation of lidocaine gel. A statistically significant, slightly lower pain score was documented for PPNB and might be preferred when the focus is analgesia. On the other hand, due to the minor difference and easier administration, intrarectal gel instillation seems to be a reasonable practice for standard analgesia for MRI-guided in-bore biopsy. KEY POINTS: • Pain levels were low for MRI-guided in-bore biopsy using either PPNB or intrarectal instillation of lidocaine gel as analgesic method. • PPNB prior to IB-GB resulted in a slightly lower pain score but required a higher effort. • Intrarectal gel anaesthesia seems to be a reasonable practice for standard analgesia for IB-GB in an outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesics; Image-guided biopsy; Magnetic resonance–guided interventional procedures; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31250168     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06301-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Michael Quentin; Dirk Blondin; Christian Arsov; Lars Schimmöller; Andreas Hiester; Erhard Godehardt; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Robert Rabenalt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Effectiveness of local anaesthesia techniques in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Seung-Hun Song; Jeong Kon Kim; Kanghyon Song; Hanjong Ahn; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.369

3.  Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Michael Quentin; Andreas Hiester; Dirk Blondin; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Lars Schimmöller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Tolerance of prostate biopsy with use of local anesthesia and benzodiazepines: a randomized, prospective study].

Authors:  A Montoliu García; J Juan Escudero; M Fabuel Deltoro; F Serrano de la Cruz Torrijos; A Alvarez Barrera; A Amorós Torres; M Ramos de Campos; E Marqués Vidal
Journal:  Actas Urol Esp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 0.994

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.

Authors:  Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Dirk Blondin; Michael Quentin; Andreas Hiester; Erhard Godehardt; Helmut E Gabbert; Nikolaus Becker; Gerald Antoch; Peter Albers; Lars Schimmöller
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective trial comparing periprostatic infiltration with lidocaine with the intrarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream.

Authors:  Ioannis Adamakis; Dionisios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos Haritopoulos; Christos Alamanis; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Aris Giannopoulos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Comparison of local anesthesia techniques during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies.

Authors:  Brian N Stirling; Kenneth F Shockley; George G Carothers; Thomas J Maatman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Prospective study comparing two methods of anaesthesia for prostate biopsies: apex periprostatic nerve block versus intrarectal lidocaine gel: review of the literature.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez; Georges Kyriakou; Emmanuelle Leray; Bernard Lobel; François Guillé
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  MRI-Guided In-Bore Biopsy: Differences Between Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization in Primary and Secondary Biopsy Settings.

Authors:  Lars Schimmöller; Dirk Blondin; Christian Arsov; Robert Rabenalt; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Michael Quentin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Feasibility of a 2nd generation MR-compatible manipulator for transrectal prostate biopsy guidance.

Authors:  J G R Bomers; D G H Bosboom; G H Tigelaar; J Sabisch; J J Fütterer; D Yakar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.