Judith Dyson1, Maurice Madeo2. 1. University of Hull, Hull, UK. 2. Infection Prevention and Control, North Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, Lincolnshire, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hand hygiene (HH) prevents the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. Electronic HH monitoring and prompt devices have been developed to overcome problems with monitoring HH and to improve compliance. Devices monitor room entry and exit and soap use through communication between ceiling sensors and badges worn by practitioners and the badges sense alcohol rub. OBJECTIVES: To investigate (1) the impact of devices on HH compliance, (2) how devices influence behaviour and (3) the experience and opinions of practitioners on the use devices. METHODS: HH compliance was monitored (before, during and after system installation) by observations and alcohol rub usage. Compliance during installation was also monitored by the device. Healthcare practitioner interviews (n = 12) explored how the device influenced behaviour and experiences and opinions of wearing the device. RESULTS: HH compliance improved during the period the device was installed. Practitioners reported the device increased their awareness, enhancing their empathy for patients and encouraged patients and colleagues to prompt when HH was needed. Practitioners' reported better HH, gaming the system and feelings of irritation. CONCLUSION: HH prompt and monitoring systems seem to improve compliance but improvements may be undermined by practitioner irritation and system gaming.
INTRODUCTION: Hand hygiene (HH) prevents the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. Electronic HH monitoring and prompt devices have been developed to overcome problems with monitoring HH and to improve compliance. Devices monitor room entry and exit and soap use through communication between ceiling sensors and badges worn by practitioners and the badges sense alcohol rub. OBJECTIVES: To investigate (1) the impact of devices on HH compliance, (2) how devices influence behaviour and (3) the experience and opinions of practitioners on the use devices. METHODS: HH compliance was monitored (before, during and after system installation) by observations and alcohol rub usage. Compliance during installation was also monitored by the device. Healthcare practitioner interviews (n = 12) explored how the device influenced behaviour and experiences and opinions of wearing the device. RESULTS: HH compliance improved during the period the device was installed. Practitioners reported the device increased their awareness, enhancing their empathy for patients and encouraged patients and colleagues to prompt when HH was needed. Practitioners' reported better HH, gaming the system and feelings of irritation. CONCLUSION: HH prompt and monitoring systems seem to improve compliance but improvements may be undermined by practitioner irritation and system gaming.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hand hygiene; behaviour change; compliance; electronic monitor and prompt; healthcare-associated infections; infection control; qualitative research
Authors: Debbie Bonetti; Martin Eccles; Marie Johnston; Nick Steen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Rachel Baker; Anne Walker; Nigel Pitts Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2004-12-08 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Katherine Ellingson; Philip M Polgreen; Amy Schneider; Laura Shinkunas; Lauris C Kaldjian; Donald Wright; Geb W Thomas; Alberto M Segre; Ted Herman; L Clifford McDonald; Ronda Sinkowitz-Cochran Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-09-20 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Arjun K Venkatesh; Mary G Lankford; Denise M Rooney; Todd Blachford; Charles M Watts; Gary A Noskin Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Alexandre R Marra; Thiago Zinsly Sampaio Camargo; Thyago Pereira Magnus; Rosangela Pereira Blaya; Gilson Batista Dos Santos; Luciana Reis Guastelli; Rodrigo Dias Rodrigues; Marcelo Prado; Elivane da Silva Victor; Humberto Bogossian; Julio Cesar Martins Monte; Oscar Fernando Pavão dos Santos; Carlos Kazume Oyama; Michael B Edmond Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2014-04-13 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Deepti Sharma; Geb W Thomas; Eric D Foster; Jaclyn Iacovelli; Krista M Lea; Judy A Streit; Philip M Polgreen Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Christopher Fuller; Susan Michie; Joanne Savage; John McAteer; Sarah Besser; Andre Charlett; Andrew Hayward; Barry D Cookson; Ben S Cooper; Georgia Duckworth; Annette Jeanes; Jenny Roberts; Louise Teare; Sheldon Stone Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240