Literature DB >> 15743661

Guiding the design and selection of interventions to influence the implementation of evidence-based practice: an experimental simulation of a complex intervention trial.

Debbie Bonetti1, Martin Eccles, Marie Johnston, Nick Steen, Jeremy Grimshaw, Rachel Baker, Anne Walker, Nigel Pitts.   

Abstract

A consistent finding in health services research is the report of uneven uptake of research findings. Implementation trials have a variable record of success in effectively influencing clinicians' behaviour. A more systematic approach may be to conduct Intervention Modelling Experiments before service-level trials, examining intervention effects on 'interim endpoints' representing clinical behaviour, derived from empirically supported psychological theories. The objectives were to: (1) Design Intervention Modelling Experiments by backward engineering a 'real-world' randomised controlled trial (NEXUS); (2) examine the applicability of psychological theories to clinical decision-making; (3) explore whether psychological theories can illuminate how interventions achieve their effects. A 2 x 2 factorial randomised controlled trial was designed with pre- and post-intervention data collection by postal questionnaire surveys. The first survey was used to generate feedback data and the interventions were delivered in the second survey. General medical practitioners (GPs) in England and Scotland participated. First survey respondents were randomised twice to receive or not audit and feedback and educational reminder messages. The main outcome measures included behavioural intention (general plan to refer for lumbar X-rays) and simulated behaviour (specific, scenario-based, decisions to refer for lumbar X-ray). Predictors were attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control (theory of planned behaviour), self-efficacy (social cognitive theory) and decision difficulty. Both interventions significantly influenced simulated behaviour, but neither influenced behavioural intention. There were no interaction effects. All theoretically derived cognitions significantly predicted simulated behaviour. Only subjective norm was not predictive of behavioural intention. The effect of audit and feedback on simulated behaviour was mediated through perceived behavioural control. The results of this study suggest that Intervention Modelling Experiments, using psychological models to help isolate mediators of clinical decision-making, may be a means of developing more potent interventions, and selecting implementation interventions with a greater likelihood of success in a service-level randomised controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15743661     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  40 in total

1.  Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research.

Authors:  Lisa V Rubenstein; Jacqueline Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evaluating interventions aimed at promoting information utilization in organizations and systems.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Astrid Brousselle; Nonvignon Marius Kêdoté
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-08

3.  Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Implementation Study for Spinal Disorders: A Randomized Trial with Postal Follow-ups.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Louis Laurencelle; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

4.  Developing and evaluating interventions to reduce inappropriate prescribing by general practitioners of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: a randomised controlled trial to compare paper-based and web-based modelling experiments.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Ian W Ricketts; Jillian Francis; Martin Eccles; Debbie Bonetti; Nigel B Pitts; Graeme Maclennan; Frank Sullivan; Claire Jones; Mark Weal; Karen Barnett
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Improving professional practice in the disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: a modeling experiment to evaluate a theory-based intervention.

Authors:  Martin P Eccles; Jill Francis; Robbie Foy; Marie Johnston; Claire Bamford; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Julian Hughes; Jan Lecouturier; Nick Steen; Paula M Whitty
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009

6.  Knowledge may not be the best target for strategies to influence evidence-based practice: using psychological models to understand RCT effects.

Authors:  D Bonetti; M Johnston; N B Pitts; C Deery; I Ricketts; C Tilley; J E Clarkson
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-02-20

7.  Investigating the use of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring and prompt device: influence and acceptability.

Authors:  Judith Dyson; Maurice Madeo
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2017-07-04

8.  Using psychological theory to understand the clinical management of type 2 diabetes in Primary Care: a comparison across two European countries.

Authors:  Susan Hrisos; Martin P Eccles; Jill J Francis; Marije Bosch; Rob Dijkstra; Marie Johnston; Richard Grol; Eileen F S Kaner; Ian N Steen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Documenting the experiences of health workers expected to implement guidelines during an intervention study in Kenyan hospitals.

Authors:  Jacinta Nzinga; Patrick Mbindyo; Lairumbi Mbaabu; Ann Warira; Mike English
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Evaluation of a theory-informed implementation intervention for the management of acute low back pain in general medical practice: the IMPLEMENT cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Simon D French; Joanne E McKenzie; Denise A O'Connor; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Duncan Mortimer; Jill J Francis; Susan Michie; Neil Spike; Peter Schattner; Peter Kent; Rachelle Buchbinder; Matthew J Page; Sally E Green
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.