Literature DB >> 29341851

Underutilization of Supplemental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Among Patients at High Breast Cancer Risk.

Randy Miles1, Fei Wan2, Tracy L Onega3, Amanda Lenderink-Carpenter4, Ellen S O'Meara2, Weiwei Zhu2, Louise M Henderson5, Jennifer S Haas6, Deirdre A Hill7, Anna N A Tosteson3, Karen J Wernli2, Jennifer Alford-Teaster3, Janie M Lee8, Constance D Lehman9, Christoph I Lee10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women at high lifetime breast cancer risk may benefit from supplemental breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening, in addition to routine mammography screening for earlier cancer detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of 422,406 women undergoing routine mammography screening across 86 Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) facilities during calendar year 2012. We determined availability and use of on-site screening breast MRI services based on woman-level characteristics, including >20% lifetime absolute risk using the National Cancer Institute risk assessment tool. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine sociodemographic characteristics associated with on-site screening MRI use.
RESULTS: Overall, 43.9% (2403/5468) of women at high lifetime risk attended a facility with on-site breast MRI screening availability. However, only 6.6% (158/2403) of high-risk women obtained breast MRI screening within a 2-year window of their screening mammogram. Patient factors associated with on-site MRI screening use included younger (<40 years) age (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-4.21), family history (OR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.13-2.63), prior breast biopsy (OR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.22-3.58), and postsecondary education (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.04-4.74).
CONCLUSIONS: While nearly half of women at high lifetime breast cancer risk undergo routine screening mammography at a facility with on-site breast MRI availability, supplemental breast MRI remains widely underutilized among those who may benefit from earlier cancer detection. Future studies should evaluate whether other enabling factors such as formal risk assessment and patient awareness of high lifetime breast cancer risk can mitigate the underutilization of supplemental screening breast MRI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  access; breast cancer; disparities; high-risk screening; supplemental breast MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29341851      PMCID: PMC6007803          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  36 in total

1.  Breast cancer risk reduction options: awareness, discussion, and use among women from four ethnic groups.

Authors:  Celia Patricia Kaplan; Jennifer S Haas; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Steven E Gregorich; Carol Somkin; Genevieve Des Jarlais; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Can risk and illness perceptions predict breast cancer worry in healthy women?

Authors:  Andrea Gibbons; AnnMarie Groarke
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2015-02-23

3.  Survival in prospectively ascertained familial breast cancer: analysis of a series stratified by tumour characteristics, BRCA mutations and oophorectomy.

Authors:  Pål Møller; Ake Borg; D Gareth Evans; Neva Haites; Marta M Reis; Hans Vasen; Elaine Anderson; C Michael Steel; Jaran Apold; David Goudie; Anthony Howell; Fiona Lalloo; Lovise Maehle; Helen Gregory; Ketil Heimdal
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-10-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Maegan V Prummel; Derek Muradali; Vicky Majpruz; Meaghan Horgan; June C Carroll; Andrea Eisen; Wendy S Meschino; Rene S Shumak; Ellen Warner; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Breast MRI use uncommon among U.S. women.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Susan A Sabatino; Trevor D Thompson; Nancy Breen; Mary C White; A Blythe Ryerson; Stephen Taplin; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Influence of NCI cancer center attendance on mortality in lung, breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Eric J Duell; Xun Shi; Eugene Demidenko; Daniel Gottlieb; David C Goodman
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography.

Authors:  Madeleine Tilanus-Linthorst; Leon Verhoog; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Karina Bartels; Marian Menke-Pluymers; Alexander Eggermont; Jan Klijn; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Theo van der Kwast; Cecile Brekelmans
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Geographic access to breast imaging for US women.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Rebecca Hubbard; Deirdre Hill; Christoph I Lee; Jennifer S Haas; Heather A Carlos; Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Andy Bogart; Wendy B DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Beth A Virnig; Diana S M Buist; Louise Henderson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Is the closest facility the one actually used? An assessment of travel time estimation based on mammography facilities.

Authors:  Jennifer Alford-Teaster; Jane M Lange; Rebecca A Hubbard; Christoph I Lee; Jennifer S Haas; Xun Shi; Heather A Carlos; Louise Henderson; Deirdre Hill; Anna N A Tosteson; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.918

View more
  11 in total

1.  Differences between screen-detected and interval breast cancers among BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Emily C Zabor; Elizabeth Gilbert; Michelle Stempel; Oriana Petruolo; Debra Mangino; Mark Robson; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Kinetic Analysis of Lesions Identified on a Rapid Abridged Multiphase (RAMP) Breast MRI Protocol.

Authors:  Sadia Choudhery; Shinn-Huey S Chou; Ken Chang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Breast Cancer Screening Practices for High-Risk Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Providers.

Authors:  Anne Blaes; Rachel I Vogel; Rebekah H Nagler; Alicia Allen; Susan Mason; Deanna Teoh; Kristine Talley; Nancy C Raymond; Jean F Wyman
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Uptake of Risk Appropriate Behaviors After Breast Cancer Risk Stratification in the Mammography Screening Population.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Bethany L Niell; Bianca M Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Richard Roetzheim; Kimberly Funaro; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Impact of Genetic Testing on Risk-Management Behavior of Black Breast Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal, Observational Study.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Monica L Kasting; Bianca M Augusto; Jennifer D Garcia; Deborah Cragun; Brian D Gonzalez; Jongphil Kim; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Cheryl L Knott; Chanita Hughes-Halbert; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Bianca Augusto; McKenzie McIntyre; Claire C Conley; Travis Gerke; Richard Roetzheim; Jennifer Garcia; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Layers of information: interacting constraints on breast cancer risk-management by high-risk African American women.

Authors:  Tasleem J Padamsee; Rachel Meadows; Megan Hils
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 2.732

Review 8.  Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Christiane K Kuhl; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Understanding indications and defining guidelines for breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter K Schoub
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-30

10.  Prospective multicenter assessment of patient preferences for properties of gadolinium-based contrast media and their potential socioeconomic impact in a screening breast MRI setting.

Authors:  Sean A Woolen; Jonathan P Troost; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Akshat C Pujara; Jennifer S McDonald; Robert J McDonald; Prasad Shankar; Alana A Lewin; Amy N Melsaether; Steven M Westphal; Katherine H Patterson; Ashley Nettles; John P Welby; Parth Pradip Patel; Neud Kiros; Lisa Piccoli; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.