Literature DB >> 31433260

Breast Cancer Screening Practices for High-Risk Women: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Providers.

Anne Blaes1, Rachel I Vogel1, Rebekah H Nagler1, Alicia Allen1, Susan Mason1, Deanna Teoh1, Kristine Talley1, Nancy C Raymond1, Jean F Wyman1.   

Abstract

Background: Little literature exists on primary care providers' knowledge and preferences toward breast cancer screening for high-risk women. Materials and
Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey of primary care providers in Minnesota was conducted in 2016. The primary aim was to determine the breast cancer screening practices of primary care providers for women at high risk for breast cancer. A multipart questionnaire focused on breast cancer screening practices for high-risk women and perceived risks/benefits of breast cancer screening was administered. Statistical analyses, included descriptive statistics and tests of differences in screening practices and knowledge across key professional characteristics, were conducted.
Results: Eight hundred five primary care providers completed the survey (7.7% response). Participants were predominantly female (72.2%); 43.9% were physicians, 11.4% physician assistants, and 44.8% advanced practice registered nurses. One-quarter of providers recommended mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for high-risk women ages 40-49 years. There were no differences in breast MRI recommendations based on years of experience or practice setting. In high-risk women with prior chest radiation and an increased risk of breast cancer, for whom guidelines recommend mammography and MRI, 75.0% of providers recommended mammography, but only 44.3% recommended breast MRI. Recent continuing education on breast cancer screening was associated with providers being more comfortable giving high-risk screening recommendations (p = 0.002). Conclusions: Most primary care providers believe mammography is helpful in women at high risk for breast cancer. Less than half of practitioners, however, recommend breast MRI to screen women at high risk for breast cancer, despite guidelines promoting the use of breast MRI. Increased provider education is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; cancer screening; preventive care; women's health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31433260      PMCID: PMC7247038          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  27 in total

1.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Corbelli; Sonya Borrero; Rachel Bonnema; Megan McNamara; Kevin Kraemer; Doris Rubio; Irina Karpov; Melissa McNeil
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014 May-Jun

4.  Implementing the commission on cancer standards for survivorship care plans.

Authors:  Carrie Tompkins Stricker; Michele O'Brien
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.027

5.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Ruth Etzioni; Abbe Herzig; James S Michaelson; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Louise C Walter; Timothy R Church; Christopher R Flowers; Samuel J LaMonte; Andrew M D Wolf; Carol DeSantis; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Kimberly Andrews; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Debbie Saslow; Robert A Smith; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Screening mammography beliefs and recommendations: a web-based survey of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Shagufta Yasmeen; Patrick S Romano; Daniel J Tancredi; Naomi H Saito; Julie Rainwater; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.

Authors:  Ceara Tess Cunningham; Hude Quan; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Tom Noseworthy; Cynthia A Beck; Elijah Dixon; Susan Samuel; William A Ghali; Lindsay L Sykes; Nathalie Jetté
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Long-term results of screening with magnetic resonance imaging in women with BRCA mutations.

Authors:  K Passaperuma; E Warner; P A Causer; K A Hill; S Messner; J W Wong; R A Jong; F C Wright; M J Yaffe; E A Ramsay; S Balasingham; L Verity; A Eisen; B Curpen; R Shumak; D B Plewes; S A Narod
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.