Literature DB >> 29333590

Advantages and Disadvantages in Image Processing with Free Software in Radiology.

Katrin Muradas Mujika1, Juan Antonio Juanes Méndez2, Andrés Framiñan de Miguel3.   

Abstract

Currently, there are sophisticated applications that make it possible to visualize medical images and even to manipulate them. These software applications are of great interest, both from a teaching and a radiological perspective. In addition, some of these applications are known as Free Open Source Software because they are free and the source code is freely available, and therefore it can be easily obtained even on personal computers. Two examples of free open source software are Osirix Lite® and 3D Slicer®. However, this last group of free applications have limitations in its use. For the radiological field, manipulating and post-processing images is increasingly important. Consequently, sophisticated computing tools that combine software and hardware to process medical images are needed. In radiology, graphic workstations allow their users to process, review, analyse, communicate and exchange multidimensional digital images acquired with different image-capturing radiological devices. These radiological devices are basically CT (Computerised Tomography), MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), PET (Positron Emission Tomography), etc. Nevertheless, the programs included in these workstations have a high cost which always depends on the software provider and is always subject to its norms and requirements. With this study, we aim to present the advantages and disadvantages of these radiological image visualization systems in the advanced management of radiological studies. We will compare the features of the VITREA2® and AW VolumeShare 5® radiology workstation with free open source software applications like OsiriX® and 3D Slicer®, with examples from specific studies.

Keywords:  3D slicer ®; AW VolumeShare 5®; Free open source software; Imaging diagnosis; Osirix lite ®; Vitrea2 ®; Workstation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29333590     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0888-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  11 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion tensor imaging of cerebral white matter: a pictorial review of physics, fiber tract anatomy, and tumor imaging patterns.

Authors:  Brian J Jellison; Aaron S Field; Joshua Medow; Mariana Lazar; M Shariar Salamat; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Efficacy and reliability of highly functional open source DICOM software (OsiriX) in spine surgery.

Authors:  Tomonori Yamauchi; Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Takeo Furuya; Koichi Hayashi; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Hiroshi Takahashi; Noriyuki Yanagawa; Masao Koda
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Assessment of DICOM Viewers Capable of Loading Patient-specific 3D Models Obtained by Different Segmentation Platforms in the Operating Room.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lo Presti; Marina Carbone; Damiano Ciriaci; Daniele Aramini; Mauro Ferrari; Vincenzo Ferrari
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Open source software in a practical approach for post processing of radiologic images.

Authors:  Gianluca Valeri; Francesco Antonino Mazza; Stefania Maggi; Daniele Aramini; Luigi La Riccia; Giovanni Mazzoni; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Interactive diffusion tensor tractography visualization for neurosurgical planning.

Authors:  Alexandra J Golby; Gordon Kindlmann; Isaiah Norton; Alexander Yarmarkovich; Steven Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  [Multislice spiral CT angiography in the evaluation of the anatomy of splanchnic vessels: preliminary experience].

Authors:  A Laghi; C Catalano; R Iannaccone; P Paolantonio; V Panebianco; I Sansoni; S Trenna; R Passariello
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  3D Slicer as a tool for interactive brain tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Ron Kikinis; Steve Pieper
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

9.  [OsiriX, a useful tool for processing tomographic images in patients with facial fracture].

Authors:  Eduardo Sierra-Martínez; Ricardo Cienfuegos-Monroy; Gerardo Fernández-Sobrino
Journal:  Cir Cir       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.361

Review 10.  Free/Libre open source software in health care: a review.

Authors:  Thomas Karopka; Holger Schmuhl; Hans Demski
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2014-01-31
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Review of the main surgical and angiographic-oriented classifications of the course of the internal carotid artery through a novel interactive 3D model.

Authors:  Marc Valera Melé; Anna Puigdellívol-Sánchez; Marija Mavar-Haramija; Juan A Juanes-Méndez; Luis San Román; Matteo De Notaris; Giuseppe Catapano; Alberto Prats-Galino
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Similar clinical and radiographic outcomes after two different hypoallergenic medial unicompartmental knee in patients with metal allergy.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Nicola Ursino; Ilaria Mariani; Katia Corona; Filippo Maria Anghilieri; Emanuele Franchi; Lorenzo Monti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-29

3.  Nontargeted metabolomics-based multiple machine learning modeling boosts early accurate detection for citrus Huanglongbing.

Authors:  Zhixin Wang; Yue Niu; Tripti Vashisth; Jingwen Li; Robert Madden; Taylor Shea Livingston; Yu Wang
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 7.291

4.  No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Rafael Loucas; Marios Loucas; Riccardo Giorgino; Nicola Ursino; Giuseppe Maria Peretti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 1.033

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.