PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to optimize the protocol for multislice spiral CT angiography and to assess the ability of the technique to detect the anatomy of splanchnic vessels, using volume rendering as reconstruction algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The anatomy of splanchnic vessels was studied in 19 patients (11 men, 8 women, age range 38-83 years) undergoing CT of the abdomen and pelvis. All examinations were performed with a multislice spiral CT scanner (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using the following parameters: collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1 mm; table feed, 8 mm/sec; reconstruction interval, 1 mm; mAs, 120; kVp, 120. Before the study, the patients received 800 ml of water as oral contrast agent to opacify the stomach and small bowel. A nonionic contrast medium (130-140 ml; Xenetix 350, Guerbet, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France) was infused intravenously at a rate of 3-5 ml/sec. Two scans of the abdomen and pelvis were obtained at 20-25 sec (arterial phase) and 60-65 sec (venous phase) after starting contrast medium injection. Image elaboration was performed using Vitrea 2.2 (Vital Images; Minneapolis, Minn., USA), a software with volume-rendering capabilities. RESULTS: All major arterial (celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric artery) and venous (portal vein, superior mesenteric vein, inferior mesenteric vein, and splenic vein) vessels could be evaluated with excellent detail in all patients. Side branches, including small collaterals, could also be easily visualized. Volume rendered images always provided better understanding of the 3D anatomic relationships among splanchnic vessels and surrounding organs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Multislice spiral CT angiography allows for optimal depiction of the anatomy of splanchnic vessels. It can be anticipated that the clinical applications of this imaging modality in the study of splanchnic vessels will be greatly expanded. However, further studies are necessary to rigorously compare the results of multislice spiral CT angiography with conventional angiography in terms of diagnostic accuracy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to optimize the protocol for multislice spiral CT angiography and to assess the ability of the technique to detect the anatomy of splanchnic vessels, using volume rendering as reconstruction algorithm. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The anatomy of splanchnic vessels was studied in 19 patients (11 men, 8 women, age range 38-83 years) undergoing CT of the abdomen and pelvis. All examinations were performed with a multislice spiral CT scanner (Somatom Plus 4 Volume Zoom; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using the following parameters: collimation, 1 mm; slice width, 1 mm; table feed, 8 mm/sec; reconstruction interval, 1 mm; mAs, 120; kVp, 120. Before the study, the patients received 800 ml of water as oral contrast agent to opacify the stomach and small bowel. A nonionic contrast medium (130-140 ml; Xenetix 350, Guerbet, Aulnay-Sous-Bois, France) was infused intravenously at a rate of 3-5 ml/sec. Two scans of the abdomen and pelvis were obtained at 20-25 sec (arterial phase) and 60-65 sec (venous phase) after starting contrast medium injection. Image elaboration was performed using Vitrea 2.2 (Vital Images; Minneapolis, Minn., USA), a software with volume-rendering capabilities. RESULTS: All major arterial (celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric artery) and venous (portal vein, superior mesenteric vein, inferior mesenteric vein, and splenic vein) vessels could be evaluated with excellent detail in all patients. Side branches, including small collaterals, could also be easily visualized. Volume rendered images always provided better understanding of the 3D anatomic relationships among splanchnic vessels and surrounding organs. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Multislice spiral CT angiography allows for optimal depiction of the anatomy of splanchnic vessels. It can be anticipated that the clinical applications of this imaging modality in the study of splanchnic vessels will be greatly expanded. However, further studies are necessary to rigorously compare the results of multislice spiral CT angiography with conventional angiography in terms of diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Francesco Saverio Mari; Giuseppe Nigri; Alessandra Pancaldi; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Marcello Gasparrini; Anna Dall'Oglio; Fioralba Pindozzi; Andrea Laghi; Antonio Brescia Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-01-05 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: F Cademartiri; A Palumbo; E Maffei; C Martini; R Malagò; M Belgrano; L La Grutta; T V Bartolotta; G Luccichenti; M Midiri; R Raaijmakers; N Mollet; M Zompatori; G Crisi Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-10-29 Impact factor: 3.469