Literature DB >> 29332239

Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Fong Poh Ling1, T Chevillotte1, A Leglise1, W Thompson1, C Bouthors1, Jean-Charles Le Huec2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cervical spine is part of the spine with the most mobility in the sagittal plane. It is important for surgeons to have reliable, simple and reproducible parameters to analyse the cervical. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: This study is a systematic review and a critique of current parameters to help improve the study of cervical spinal balance. We conducted a systematic search of PUBMED/MEDLINE for literature published since January 2014. Only studies written in English and containing abstracts were considered for inclusion. The search performed was: «C7 slope» OR «T1 slope» OR «C2C7 offset» OR «C2C7 lordosis» OR «cervical SVA (sagittal vertical axis)» OR «TIA (thoracic inlet angle)» (Lee et al., J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):E41-E47, 2012) OR «SCA (spino-cranial angle)». Exclusion criteria were purely post-operative and cadaveric analysis, studies performed with CT scan or MRI, studies on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, traumatology studies and no standing analysis of the cervical spine. Relevance was confirmed by investigators if cervical parameters was a major criteria of the study.
RESULTS: 138 articles were found by the electronic search. After complete evaluation 20 articles were selected. The large majority of papers used the same parameters C2_C7 lordosis, C2-C7 SVA, T1 slope or C7 slope and T1 slope/cervical lordosis mismatch. Janusz reported a new parameter using a retrospective cohort of patient with cervical radiculopathy: the TIA (thoracic inlet angle). Le Huec reported an other new parameter based on a prospective study of asymptomatic volunteer: the spino-cranial angle (SCA). This parameter is highly correlated with the C7 slope and the cervical lordosis. Other studies reported parameters that are more global balance analysis including the cervical spine than cervical spine balance itself.
CONCLUSION: The most important parameters to analyse the cervical sagittal balance according to the literature available today for good clinical outcomes are the following: C7 or T1 slope, average value 20°, must not be higher than 40°. cSVA must not be less than 40°C (mean value 20 mm). SCA (spine cranial angle) must stay in a norm (83° ± 9°). Future studies should focus on those three parameters to analyse and compare pre and post op data and to correlate the results with the quality of life improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C7 slope; Cervical SVA; Cervical lordosis; Cervical spine; Sagittal balance; Spino-cranial angle; T1 slope

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29332239     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5462-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  33 in total

Review 1.  Pelvic parameters: origin and significance.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; S Aunoble; Leijssen Philippe; Pellet Nicolas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Christopher P Ames; Benjamin Blondel; Justin K Scheer; Frank J Schwab; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Eric M Massicotte; Alpesh A Patel; Vincent C Traynelis; Han Jo Kim; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Does whole-spine lateral radiograph with clavicle positioning reflect the correct cervical sagittal alignment?

Authors:  Sang-Min Park; Kwang-Sup Song; Seung-Hwan Park; Hyun Kang; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Sagittal balance of the pelvis-spine complex and lumbar degenerative diseases. A comparative study about 85 cases.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Jérôme Jund; Olivier Noseda; Pierre Roussouly
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The Influence of Age and Sex on Cervical Spinal Alignment Among Volunteers Aged Over 50.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Keiichi Nakai; Tomohiro Yamada; Hideyuki Arima; Tomohiro Banno; Tatsuya Yasuda; Sho Kobayasi; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cervical Alignment Variations in Different Postures and Predictors of Normal Cervical Kyphosis: A New Understanding.

Authors:  Hwee Weng Dennis Hey; Eugene Tze-Chun Lau; Gordon Chengyuan Wong; Kimberly-Anne Tan; Gabriel Ka-Po Liu; Hee-Kit Wong
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Is It Possible To Evaluate the Ideal Cervical Alignment for Each Patient Needing Surgery? An Easy Rule To Determine the Appropriate Cervical Lordosis in Preoperative Planning.

Authors:  Marco Ajello; Nicola Marengo; Giulia Pilloni; Federica Penner; Giovanni Vercelli; Federico Pecoraro; Francesco Zenga; Alexander R Vaccaro; Alessandro Ducati; Diego Garbossa
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Predicting Cervical Alignment Required to Maintain Horizontal Gaze Based on Global Spinal Alignment.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Vincent Challier; Jensen K Henry; Jonathan H Oren; Matthew Adam Spiegel; Shaleen Vira; Elizabeth M Tanzi; Barthelemy Liabaud; Renaud Lafage; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Thomas J Errico; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Variations in Occipitocervical and Cervicothoracic Alignment Parameters Based on Age: A Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Volunteers Using Full-Body Radiographs.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Lawrence G Lenke; Venu M Nemani; Michael Fu; Grant D Shifflett; Todd J Albert; Brenda A Sides; Lionel N Metz; Matthew E Cunningham; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Wafa Skalli; Nicola Hawkinson; Pierre-Marie Gagey; Stephen Ondra; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Yong Hai; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Effects of combined adjustable Halo-pelvic fixation brace on cervical spine alignment in patients with severe rigid spinal deformity.

Authors:  Zhigang Rong; Chengmin Zhang; Peng Cheng; Fei Dai; Can Chen; Xueke Yu; Jianzhong Xu; Fei Luo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.030

3.  Correlation between the cervical sagittal alignment and spine - pelvic sagittal alignment in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya; Andrés Flepe Vargas Rosales; Diana Paola Duarte Mora; Johan David Serrato Perdomo; Gabriel Vargas Rosales; Gerardo Ardila Duarte; Erik Edgardo Muñoz Rodríguez
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-09-14

4.  Posterior Occipitocervical Fusion for Unstable Upper Cervical Trauma in Old and Elderly Population, Although Decreases Upper Cervical Rotation, Does Not Significantly Increase Neck Disability Index.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Vasileios Syrimpeis; Evangelia Mpountogianni; Ioannis Papaioannou; Vasileios Tsekouras
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-07-21

5.  Can Supine Magnetic Resonance Imaging Be an Alternative to Standing Lateral Radiographs for Evaluating Cervical Sagittal Alignment?

Authors:  Sung Hyun Bae; Dong Wuk Son; Su Hun Lee; Jun Seok Lee; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-06-05

6.  Four-year pain relief after coblation combined with active exercise for cervical discogenic pain: Case report.

Authors:  Xiuhua Li; Liqiang Yang; Jiaxiang Ni; Yuqi Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Can C7 Slope Be Used as a Substitute for T1 Slope? A Radiographic Analysis.

Authors:  Ivan B Ye; Ray Tang; Zoe B Cheung; Samuel J W White; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-08

8.  Posterior open-door laminoplasty secured with titanium miniplates vs anchors: a comparative study of clinical efficacy and cervical sagittal balance.

Authors:  Dongyue Li; Yong Hai; Xianglong Meng; Jincai Yang; Peng Yin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Balance in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Pinghui Zhou; Lujie Zong; Qian Wu; Yuchen Ye; Zhili Zhang; Huilin Yang; Changchun Zhang; Shenghao Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-07-29

10.  Reply to Commentary on "Impact of Nonlordotic Sagittal Alignment on Short-term Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement".

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.