Literature DB >> 27116113

Variations in Occipitocervical and Cervicothoracic Alignment Parameters Based on Age: A Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Volunteers Using Full-Body Radiographs.

Sravisht Iyer1, Lawrence G Lenke2,3,4, Venu M Nemani5, Michael Fu1, Grant D Shifflett6, Todd J Albert7,8,9, Brenda A Sides10, Lionel N Metz11, Matthew E Cunningham1, Han Jo Kim1,9.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Cohort Study OBJECTIVE.: To describe age-stratified normative values of novel occipitocervical, cervical, and cervicothoracic alignment parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Full-body radiographic images obtained without stitching or vertical distortion represent an ideal method to evaluate occipitocervical alignment and horizontal gaze.
METHODS: One hundred twenty adults with no back or neck symptoms were recruited. Age, sex, body mass index, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Oswestry Disability Index scores were recorded. Radiographic parameters measured included: center sacral vertebral line, chin brow vertical angle (CBVA), orbital tilt (OrT), orbital slope, occipital slope (OS), occipital incidence, occiput-C2 (O-C2) lordosis, cervical lordosis (C2-C7, CL), T1 slope (TS), neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle (TIA), cervicothoracic kyphosis (C6-T4), and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA). Interobserver reliability was calculated for all measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC). A Pearson correlation was used to determine relationships between variables.
RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were analyzed; average age as 50.1 years (range 22-78). All measured variables had an ICC >0.6. CL (r = -0.33, P < 0.001), TS (r = 0.42, P < 0.001), TIA (r = 0.24, P = 0.010), and C7 SVA (r = 0.48, P < 0.001) all increased with age. OrT (r = -0.88, P < 0.001) and OS (r = 0.73, P < 0.001) were both strongly correlated with CBVA and each other (r = -0.83, P ≤ 0.001). Both measures were also correlated with the C2-C7 SVA (OrT, r = 0.41, P < 0.001; OS, r = -0.29, P = 0.002) and O-C2 angle (OrT, r = 0.46, P < 0.001; OS, r = -0.28, P = 0.003). C6-T4 angulations was negatively correlated with NDI scores in this population (r = -0.25, P = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: We present age-based normative values for occipitocervical, cervicothoracic, and cervical alignment parameters using a novel biplanar radiographic imaging technique. We introduce measures of craniocervical alignment that might provide surgeons with an intuitive way to account for the position of the orbit when planning cervical deformity correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27116113     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Correlation and differences in cervical sagittal alignment parameters between cervical radiographs and magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Masahito Oshina; Masashi Tanaka; Yasushi Oshima; Sakae Tanaka; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Three types of sagittal alignment regarding compensation in asymptomatic adults: the contribution of the spine and lower limbs.

Authors:  Hongda Bao; Renaud Lafage; Barthelemy Liabaud; Jonathan Elysée; Bassel G Diebo; Gregory Poorman; Cyrus Jalai; Peter Passias; Aaron Buckland; Shay Bess; Thomas Errico; Lawrence G Lenke; Munish Gupta; Han Jo Kim; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; John R Dimar; Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

5.  [Normative values of cervical sagittal alignment according to the whole spine balance: Based on 126 asymptomatic Chinese young adults].

Authors:  Y C Tang; W K Zhao; M Yu; X G Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-08-18

6.  Correlation between the Photographic Cranial Angles and Radiographic Cervical Spine Alignment.

Authors:  Tomoko Kawasaki; Shunsuke Ohji; Junya Aizawa; Tomoko Sakai; Kenji Hirohata; Hironobu Kuruma; Hirohisa Koseki; Atsushi Okawa; Tetsuya Jinno
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The impact of age, sex, disc height loss and T1 slope on the upper and lower cervical lordosis: a large-scale radiologic study.

Authors:  Youping Tao; Fabio Galbusera; Frank Niemeyer; René Jonas; Dino Samartzis; Daniel Vogele; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Authors:  Fong Poh Ling; T Chevillotte; A Leglise; W Thompson; C Bouthors; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Age-based normal sagittal alignment in Chinese asymptomatic adults: establishment of the relationships between pelvic incidence and other parameters.

Authors:  Siyu Zhou; Fei Xu; Wei Wang; Da Zou; Zhuoran Sun; Weishi Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.