Literature DB >> 27196017

Predicting Cervical Alignment Required to Maintain Horizontal Gaze Based on Global Spinal Alignment.

Bassel G Diebo1, Vincent Challier2, Jensen K Henry3, Jonathan H Oren3, Matthew Adam Spiegel3, Shaleen Vira3, Elizabeth M Tanzi4, Barthelemy Liabaud1, Renaud Lafage1, Themistocles S Protopsaltis3, Thomas J Errico3, Frank J Schwab1, Virginie Lafage1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the cervical alignment necessary for the maintenance of horizontal gaze that depends on underlying thoracolumbar alignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical Sagittal Curve (CC) is affected by thoracic and global alignment. Recent studies suggest large variability in normative CC ranging from lordotic to kyphotic alignment. No previous studies have assessed the effect of global spinal alignment on CC in maintenance of horizontal gaze.
METHODS: Patients without previous history of spinal surgery and able to maintain their horizontal gaze while undergoing full body imaging were included. Patients were stratified on the basis of thoracic kyphosis (TK) into (<30, 30-40, 40-50, and >50) and then by SRS-Schwab sagittal vertical axis (SVA) modifier into (posterior alignment SVA <0, aligned 0-50, and malaligned >50 mm). Cervical alignment was assessed among SVA grade in TK groups. Stepwise linear regression analysis was applied on random selection of 60% of the population. A simplified formula was developed and validated on the remaining 40%.
RESULTS: In each TK group (n = 118, 137, 125, 197), lower CC (C2-C7) was significantly more lordotic by increased Schwab SVA grade. T1 slope and cervical SVA significantly increased with increased thoracolumbar (C7-S1) SVA. Upper CC (C0-C2) and mismatch between T1 slope and CC (T1-CL) were similar. Regression analysis revealed LL minus TK (LL-TK) as an independent predictor (r = 0.640, r = 0.410) with formula: CC = 10- (LL-TK)/2. Validation revealed that the absolute difference between the predicted CC and the actual CC was 8.5°. Moreover, 64.2% of patients had their predicted C2-C7 values within 10° of the actual CC.
CONCLUSION: Cervical kyphosis may represent normal alignment in a significant number of patients. However, in patients with SVA >50 and greater thoracic kyphosis, cervical lordosis is needed to maintain the gaze. Cervical alignment can be predicted from underlying TK and lumbar lordosis, which may be clinically relevant when considering correction for thoracolumbar or cervical deformityLevel of Evidence: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27196017      PMCID: PMC5577814          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

Review 1.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Normal sagittal profile of the cervical spine - must the cervical spine always be lordotic?]

Authors:  M Akbar; H Almansour; B Diebo; D Adler; W Pepke; M Richter
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Cervical and postural strategies for maintaining horizontal gaze in asymptomatic adults.

Authors:  Nour Khalil; Aren Joe Bizdikian; Ziad Bakouny; Michel Salameh; Naji Bou Zeid; Fares Yared; Joeffroy Otayek; Khalil Kharrat; Gaby Kreichati; Ismat Ghanem; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Ibrahim Obeid; Ayman Assi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Impact of the surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy on the preoperative cervical sagittal balance: a review of prospective comparative cohort between anterior decompression with fusion and laminoplasty.

Authors:  Kenichiro Sakai; Toshitaka Yoshii; Takashi Hirai; Yoshiyasu Arai; Kenichi Shinomiya; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; John R Dimar; Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

6.  [Normative values of cervical sagittal alignment according to the whole spine balance: Based on 126 asymptomatic Chinese young adults].

Authors:  Y C Tang; W K Zhao; M Yu; X G Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-08-18

7.  Effects of combined adjustable Halo-pelvic fixation brace on cervical spine alignment in patients with severe rigid spinal deformity.

Authors:  Zhigang Rong; Chengmin Zhang; Peng Cheng; Fei Dai; Can Chen; Xueke Yu; Jianzhong Xu; Fei Luo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.030

8.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Authors:  Fong Poh Ling; T Chevillotte; A Leglise; W Thompson; C Bouthors; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Effects of mirror placement on sagittal alignment of the spine during acquisition of full-spine standing X-Rays.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.