Literature DB >> 27751920

Is It Possible To Evaluate the Ideal Cervical Alignment for Each Patient Needing Surgery? An Easy Rule To Determine the Appropriate Cervical Lordosis in Preoperative Planning.

Marco Ajello1, Nicola Marengo1, Giulia Pilloni2, Federica Penner1, Giovanni Vercelli1, Federico Pecoraro1, Francesco Zenga1, Alexander R Vaccaro3, Alessandro Ducati1, Diego Garbossa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical sagittal alignment parameters are essential to plan stages of surgery. The aims of this study were to evaluate the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment parameters and surgical outcomes after anterior cervical arthrodesis; to identify parameters linked to a better outcome; to determine the role of the T1 slope, C7 slope, cervical lordosis, and C2-C7 plumb line; and to describe an innovative method to calculate cervical lordosis. A cohort of 70 patients without cervical kyphosis was included in our retrospective study. We analyzed C7 slope, T1 slope, cervical lordosis, and the C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Clinical postoperative outcomes were evaluated with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score.
RESULTS: Significant correlation was found between the C2-C7 SVA, C7 slope, T1 slope and the CL/C7 slope. Statistically significant differences were found between group 1 (NDI = 0; VAS = 0) and group 3 (NDI > 17; VAS > 5) regarding C2-C7 SVA (P = 0.0026), C7 slope (P = 0.0014), T1 slope (P = 0.0095) and CL/C7slope (P = 0.0012). A value less than 25 mm found in the C2-C7 SVA correlate with positive outcomes. C7 slope correlated with NDI and VAS (P = 0.0014). CL/C7 slope ratio is significantly correlated to NDI and VAS scores (ratio: -0.52; P = 0.0012). Patients with CL/C7 slope greater than 0.7 had better clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal parameters are directly correlated with clinical outcome. If C7 slope increases, higher cervical lordosis is necessary to obtain a good outcome. CL/C7 slope (0.7) multiplied by C7 slope can determine the ideal lordosis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical degenerative disease; Cervical lordosis; Cervical sagittal alignment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27751920     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.09.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Parisa Azimi; Taravat Yazdanian; Edward C Benzel; Yong Hai; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Etiology and treatment of cervical kyphosis: state of the art review-a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoji Ogura; John R Dimar; Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09

3.  Analysis of cervical sagittal alignment variations after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe imbalance: study of 59 cases.

Authors:  W Thompson; A Cogniet; M Challali; R Saddiki; J Rigal; Jean Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Authors:  Fong Poh Ling; T Chevillotte; A Leglise; W Thompson; C Bouthors; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior head translation following cervical fusion-a probable cause of post-surgical pain and impairment: a CBP® case report.

Authors:  Deed E Harrison; Paul A Oakley; Joseph W Betz
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-02-20

6.  Cervical Spine Inhomogeneously Enhancing Lesion: Avoiding Confirmation Bias.

Authors:  Federica Penner; Pietro Zeppa; Fabio Cofano; Andrea Bianconi; Marco Ajello; Francesco Zenga
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2022-01-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.