Literature DB >> 6238125

Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet.

M J Gervais, L O Harvey, J O Roberts.   

Abstract

Black, uppercase letters, subtending 6.0' of arc in height, were presented tachistoscopically to 6 subjects. An exposure duration was chosen to keep the subject's identification performance at about 50% correct. On each trial a single letter was presented, and the subject was required to identify the letter by verbal response. The resulting 26 X 26 confusion matrix was based on 3,900 trials (150 trials per letter). Several models of visual processing were used to generate predicted confusions among letter pairs. Models based on template overlap, geometric features, and two-dimensional spatial frequency content (Fourier transforms) were tested. The highest correlation (.70) between actual and predicted confusions was attained by the model based on the Fourier transformed letters filtered by the human contrast sensitivity function. These results demonstrate that the spatial frequency content of visual patterns can provide a valuable metric for predicting their psychological similarity. The results further suggest that spatial frequency models of visual processing are competitive with feature analysis models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6238125     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  A masked priming ERP study of letter processing using single letters and false fonts.

Authors:  Priya Mitra; Donna Coch
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.

Authors:  Sophie N Lanthier; Evan F Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

3.  Similarity between Fourier transforms of objects predicts their experimental confusions.

Authors:  I A Vol; M B Pavlovskaja; V M Bondarko
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

4.  The effects of alphabet and expertise on letter perception.

Authors:  Robert W Wiley; Colin Wilson; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Sylvia R Mishoulam; Robert M Nosofsky; Velma Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  A template-matching pandemonium recognizes unconstrained handwritten characters with high accuracy.

Authors:  A Larsen; C Bundesen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-03

7.  Using 10AFC to further improve the efficiency of the quick CSF method.

Authors:  Fang Hou; Luis Lesmes; Peter Bex; Michael Dorr; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Higher-contrast requirements for recognizing low-pass-filtered letters.

Authors:  MiYoung Kwon; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Alphabetic letter identification: effects of perceivability, similarity, and bias.

Authors:  Shane T Mueller; Christoph T Weidemann
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-10-26

10.  Using geometric moments to explain human letter recognition near the acuity limit.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Stanley A Klein; Feng Xue; Jun-Yun Zhang; Cong Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.