| Literature DB >> 29324644 |
Ru Song1, Jianbin Yao2, Qingqing Shi3, Rongbian Wei4.
Abstract
The nanocomposite of half-fin anchovy hydrolysates (HAHp) and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) (named as HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs) demonstrated increased antibacterial activity compared to either HAHp(3.0) or ZnO NPs as per our previous studies. Also, reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation was detected in Escherichia coli cells after treatment with HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the acute toxicity of this nanocomposite and to investigate its effect on intestinal microbiota composition, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production, and oxidative status in healthy mice. The limit test studies show that this nanoparticle is non-toxic at the doses tested. The administration of HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs, daily dose of 1.0 g/kg body weight for 14 days, increased the number of goblet cells in jejunum. High-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing of fecal samples revealed that HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs increased Firmicutes and reduced Bacteriodetes abundances in female mice. Furthermore, the microbiota for probiotic-type bacteria, including Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, and SCFAs-producing bacteria in the Clostridia class, e.g., Lachnospiraceae_unclassified and Lachnospiraceae_UCG-001, were enriched in the feces of female mice. Increases of SCFAs, especially statistically increased propionic and butyric acids, indicated the up-regulated anti-inflammatory activity of HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs. Additionally, some positive responses in liver, like markedly increased glutathione and decreased malonaldehyde contents, indicated the improved oxidative status. Therefore, our results suggest that HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs could have potential applications as a safe regulator of intestinal microbiota or also can be used as an antioxidant used in food products.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; acute toxicity; half-fin anchovy hydrolysates; oxidative status; short chain fatty acids; zinc oxide nanoparticles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324644 PMCID: PMC5793071 DOI: 10.3390/md16010023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Comparing body weight and coefficients of the liver, thymus, and spleen between the normal control and HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs treatment groups in the acute toxicity experiment.
| Group | Body Weight/g | Liver Coefficient/(g/kg) | Thymus Coefficient/(mg/10 g) | Spleen Coefficient/(mg/10 g) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day | 14 Day | ||||
| F: 19.79 ± 1.93 a | 21.10 ± 1.32 a | F: 46.41 ± 3.70 a | F: 33.34 ± 5.85 a | F: 40.49 ± 5.57 b | |
| M: 22.13 ± 1.35 b | 23.93 ± 1.82 b | M: 48.33 ± 3.14 a | M: 26.01 ± 1.14 a | M: 30.44 ± 6.77 a | |
| F: 19.86 ± 0.83 a | 20.87 ± 1.24 a | F: 45.29 ± 5.56 a | F: 31.67 ± 7.64 a | F: 40.32 ± 6.38 b | |
| M: 21.83 ± 1.59 b | 22.54 ± 2.31 ab | M: 48.29 ± 3.42 a | M: 25.50 ± 9.27 a | M: 30.28 ± 2.39 a | |
CK, normal control. Each group contained 10 female (F) and 10 male (M) mice. Different superscript letters in the same column indicate significant differences between two samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Histopathology of mice jejunum showing intestinal villi (black arrow), crypt regions (yellow arrow), and goblet cells (red arrow) from (a) female normal control, CK(F); (b) male normal control, CK(M); (c) HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs administered female mice; and (d) HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs administered male mice. HE stain at the initial magnification 200×.
Figure 2Rarefaction curves and diversity of the normal control (CK) and HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs treated (Z) specimens at 0 day, 7 day, and 14 day. (a) Rarefaction curves, numbers 1 and 2 represent female (F) specimens and numbers 3 and 4 represent male (M) specimens. Horizontal coordinate represents the number of sequencing reads randomly sampled and the longitudinal coordinate means the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) observed; (b) comparison of observed OTUs numbers among CK and Z specimens based on sex; (c) community richness based on the Chao1 index; (d) community diversity based on the Shannon index. Different lowercase letters in (b–d) indicate significant differences among specimens (p < 0.05).
Figure 3PCoA distribution of the normal control (CK) and HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs treated (Z) specimens at 0 day, 7 day, and 14 day. Numbers 1 and 2 represent female (F) specimens and numbers 3 and 4 represent male (M) specimens. (a) The scatter of PC1 and PC2; (b) the scatter of PC1 and PC3, and (c) the scatter of PC2 and PC3.
Figure 4Structure and relative abundance of intestinal microbiota at the phylum and genus levels. (a) Intestinal microbiota composition of all of the specimens at 0 day, 7 day, and 14 day at the phylum level. Numbers 1 and 2 represent the female (F) specimens and numbers 3 and 4 represent male (M) specimens; (b) comparison of relative abundance of dominant bacteria at the phylum level between the normal control (CK) and HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs treated (Z) specimens at 14 day. The relative abundance was calculated from the abundance of 16S rRNA gene sequences assigned to each bacterial community using the Greengenes database. Different lowercase letters in each phylum bacteria indicate significant differences among specimens (p < 0.05); (c) composition of intestinal microbiota at the genus level for the female specimens of 14d_CK_1 and 14d_CK_2 and 14d_Z_1 and 14d_Z_2.
Comparing relative abundance of bacteria community in fecal samples at the genus level between 14 d CK(F) and 14 d Z(F).
| Genus | Taxon | 14 d CK(F) | 14 d Z(F) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__Bacteroidales_S24-7_group; g__norank | 23.41 | 12.40 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Bacilli; o__Lactobacillales; f__Lactobacillaceae; g__Lactobacillus; s__Lactobacillus_murinus | 11.34 | 15.51 | * | |
| p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__Rikenellaceae; g__Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group; s__unidentified | 6.07 | 0.94 | * | |
| p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__Rikenellaceae; g__Alistipes; s__uncultured_bacterium | 3.54 | 0.75 | * | |
| p__Proteobacteria; c__Deltaproteobacteria; o__Desulfovibrionales; f__Desulfovibrionaceae; g__Desulfovibrio; s__uncultured_bacterium | 3.29 | 3.02 | - | |
| p__Proteobacteria; c__Epsilonproteobacteria; o__Campylobacterales; f__Helicobacteraceae; g__Helicobacter; s__Helicobacter_ganmani | 2.94 | 0.87 | - | |
| p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__Porphyromonadaceae; g__Odoribacter; s__unidentified | 3.02 | 0.86 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Erysipelotrichia; o__Erysipelotrichales; f__Erysipelotrichaceae | 3.00 | 1.68 | * | |
| p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__Bacteroidaceae; g__Bacteroides | 4.11 | 0.31 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Acetitomaculum; s__uncultured_bacterium | 1.81 | 0.51 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Lachnoclostridium | 2.19 | 2.85 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; g__Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014; s__unidentified | 1.71 | 7.26 | * | |
| p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Coriobacteriales; f__Coriobacteriaceae; g__Enterorhabdus; s__uncultured_bacterium | 1.67 | 2.03 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; g__[Eubacterium]_coprostanoligenes_group | 1.58 | 0.45 | - | |
| p__Saccharibacteria; c__Unknown_Class; o__Unknown_Order; f__Unknown_Family; g__Candidatus_Saccharimonas; s__uncultured_bacterium | 1.70 | 2.69 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Lachnoclostridium | 1.34 | 1.15 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Lachnoclostridium | 1.19 | 3.62 | - | |
| p__Bacteroidetes; c__Bacteroidia; o__Bacteroidales; f__Rikenellaceae; g__Rikenella; s__Rikenella_microfusus_DSM_15922 | 1.28 | 0.38 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Bacilli; o__Lactobacillales; f__Streptococcaceae; g__Streptococcus; s__Streptococcus_acidominimus | 1.04 | 0.30 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Roseburia | 1.54 | 2.40 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; g__Ruminococcaceae_UCG-013 | 1.01 | 2.44 | * | |
| p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Coriobacteriales; f__Coriobacteriaceae | 0.88 | 0.73 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Lachnospiraceae_UCG-006; s__uncultured_bacterium | 0.81 | 1.52 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__[Eubacterium]_xylanophilum_group; s__uncultured_bacterium | 0.85 | 1.43 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; g__Ruminococcaceae_UCG-010; s__unidentified | 0.84 | 0.69 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Bacilli; o__Lactobacillales; f__Aerococcaceae; g__Aerococcus | 1.07 | 3.29 | * | |
| p__Tenericutes; c__Mollicutes; o__Mollicutes_RF9; f__norank; g__norank | 0.47 | 0.69 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group | 0.47 | 1.54 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; g__Ruminococcus_1; s__unidentified | 0.45 | 1.54 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Bacilli; o__Bacillales; f__Staphylococcaceae; g__Staphylococcus | 0.43 | 1.20 | * | |
| p__Proteobacteria; c__Gammaproteobacteria; o__Vibrionales; f__Vibrionaceae; g__Vibrio | 0.22 | 2.02 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae | 0.19 | 0.96 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Ruminococcaceae; g__Ruminiclostridium_5 | 0.16 | 0.89 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Marvinbryantia | 0.15 | 1.45 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Lachnospiraceae_UCG-001; s__unidentified | 0.13 | 0.62 | - | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Erysipelotrichia; o__Erysipelotrichales; f__Erysipelotrichaceae; g__Faecalibaculum; s__uncultured_bacterium | 0.13 | 5.95 | * | |
| p__Firmicutes; c__Clostridia; o__Clostridiales; f__Lachnospiraceae; g__Coprococcus_3 | 0.07 | 0.87 | * | |
| p__Actinobacteria; c__Actinobacteria; o__Bifidobacteriales; f__Bifidobacteriaceae; g__Bifidobacterium | 0.01 | 0.53 | * |
Letters p, c, o, f, g, and s in Taxon represent phylum, class, order, family, genus and species, respectively. An asterisk represents significant differences between 14 d CK(F) and 14 d Z(F) in relative abundances (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Comparison of function prediction, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and amino acid concentrations in feces of female mice between 14 d CK(F) and 14 d Z(F). (a) Function prediction using Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG) orthology; (b) SCFAs concentration; (c) amino acid concentrations of aspatic acid (Asp), threonine (Thr), serine (Ser), glutamic acid (Glu), glycine (Gly), alanine (Ala), cysteine (Cys), valine (Val), methionine (Met), isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu), tyrosine (Tyr), phenylalanine (Phe), lysine (Lys), histidine (His), arginine (Arg), and proline (Pro). An asterisk represents a significant difference between 14 d CK(F) and 14 d Z(F) in relative abundances or SCFAs, and amino acid concentrations (p < 0.05). The red and black asterisks in (a) represent significantly decreased and increased relative abundances, respectively. The red asterisks in (b) indicate significantly increased SCFAs concentrations. The black asterisks in (c) indicate significantly decreased amino acid concentrations.
Figure 6Comparison of liver oxidative status between 14 d CK(F) and 14 d Z(F) after 14 days of oral gavage at a dose of 1.0 g/kg body weight. (a) Total activity of superoxidase dismutase (SOD); (b) activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx); (c) activity of catalase (CAT); (d) glutathione (GSH) stock content; (e) malonaldehyde (MDA) content. In (a–e), each group contained five animals. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences compared between 14 d CK(F) and 14 d Z(F) (p < 0.05). (f) Concentrations of protein, peptide and total sulfhydryl (SH). Different lowercase letters in protein, peptide and total SH indicate significant differences compared between HAHp(3.0) and HAHp(3.0)/ZnO NPs (p < 0.05).