Literature DB >> 29323491

G-Quadruplex Identification in the Genome of Protozoan Parasites Points to Naphthalene Diimide Ligands as New Antiparasitic Agents.

Efres Belmonte-Reche1, Marta Martínez-García1, Aurore Guédin2, Michela Zuffo3, Matilde Arévalo-Ruiz1, Filippo Doria3, Jenny Campos-Salinas1, Marjorie Maynadier4, José Juan López-Rubio5, Mauro Freccero3, Jean-Louis Mergny2,6, José María Pérez-Victoria1, Juan Carlos Morales1.   

Abstract

G-quadruplexes (G4) are DNA secondary structures that take part in the regulation of gene expression. Putative G4 forming sequences (PQS) have been reported in mammals, yeast, bacteria, and viruses. Here, we present PQS searches on the genomes of T. brucei, L. major, and P. falciparum. We found telomeric sequences and new PQS motifs. Biophysical experiments showed that EBR1, a 29 nucleotide long highly repeated PQS in T. brucei, forms a stable G4 structure. G4 ligands based on carbohydrate conjugated naphthalene diimides (carb-NDIs) that bind G4's including hTel could bind EBR1 with selectivity versus dsDNA. These ligands showed important antiparasitic activity. IC50 values were in the nanomolar range against T. brucei with high selectivity against MRC-5 human cells. Confocal microscopy confirmed these ligands localize in the nucleus and kinetoplast of T. brucei suggesting they can reach their potential G4 targets. Cytotoxicity and zebrafish toxicity studies revealed sugar conjugation reduces intrinsic toxicity of NDIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29323491      PMCID: PMC6148440          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


Introduction

G-quadruplexes (G4) are secondary structures formed by guanine-rich DNA and RNA sequences. Their basic motif is a four-guanine tetrad linked through Hoogsteen hydrogen bonding that stacks on top of other G-tetrads helped by interactions with cations, such as Na+ or K+. G4 topologies are quite diverse and depend on base sequence, loop connectivity, and the syn or anti guanine configuration along the oligonucleotide folding.[1] G4 sequences are overrepresented in certain key regions of the genome[2] such as promoters, enhancers, insulators, origins of replications, and telomeres. These findings suggest that G4 have important functions in cellular and genetic processes. Visualization and genome mapping experiments[3] suggest that G-quadruplex DNA can be formed when DNA single strands are exposed during replication or transcription. G4 structures pose challenges to replication, and G4 helicases are essential to unwind them and thus maintain genetic stability.[4] Sarkies et al. also suggested that G4 DNA are involved in the maintenance of epigenetic regulation of gene expression.[5] Putative G-quadruplex sequences (PQS) have been found in organisms other than humans, such as other mammals,[6] yeast,[7] bacteria,[8] and viruses.[9] In contrast, few data have been reported of G4 in parasites.[10] The malaria-causing parasite Plasmodium falciparum has an extremely AT rich DNA (>80%), which in principle lowers the possibilities of G4 formation.[11] Nevertheless, successive bioinformatic searches have identified several putative quadruplex sequences[1e,12] that may play a role in antigenic variation and diversification.[10,12a] Bottius et al.[13] reported the existence of a common degenerate motif GGGTTYA (where Y is T or C, PfTel) in the DNA of P. falciparum and localized it mainly in the 1.3 kb (average) telomeric regions of the parasite chromosomes. This degenerate motif has also been found in other Plasmodium species.[14] Interestingly, its repetitive sequence being different from the human telomeric one (GGGTTA; hTel) in principle gives the opportunity of a selective targeting. These repeats and other G4 forming sequences are abundant in var gene regulatory regions.[10,12,15] The var genes, which regularly recombine to generate new variants,[16] code for PfEMP1, a family of variant surface antigens responsible for preventing the infected erythrocytes from being recognized by the host’s immune system by continuously presenting different PfEMP1 proteins.[17] This phenomenon of antigenic variation is produced because the parasite expresses an exclusive PfEMP1 protein but frequently switches to express different var genes.[17] The presence of G4 sequences in var gene regulatory regions has been suggested to influence var gene recombination and/or switching.[12a] Potential G4 sequences have been scarcely investigated in parasites of the Trypanosomatide order. Trypanosoma brucei and Leishmania major are responsible for two life-threatening neglected diseases, sleeping sickness (or African trypanosomiasis) and leishmaniasis, respectively. Both species present telomeric regions with tandem repetitions of the hTel sequence,[18] and their variability has been related to gene expression critical for their survival, chromosomic polymorphisms, and rearrangements.[19] In these telomeric regions G-rich sequences facilitate the switching of the important variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) genes,[10,20] which are responsible for the antigenic variation that this parasite uses to evade the immune system.[21] However, the direct involvement of quadruplexes in this process has yet to be established. On the other hand, T. brucei presents a single mitochondrion of which the genome, also known as kinetoplastid DNA, contains several open reading frames (ORF) that require editing to become translatable mRNAs.[22] Nine of these ORFs are pan-edited, leading to the site-specific insertion and deletion of hundreds of U-nucleotides.[23] Recently, 27 PQS were detected in eight of the nine pan-edited mitochondrial pre-mRNA transcripts of T. brucei.[23] Interestingly, the stepwise editing of these pre-mRNAs progressively resolves these G4 structures generating less structured ORFs, suggesting that they could be due to an evolutionary driving force for RNA editing in trypanosomes.[23] Drugs currently used to treat neglected diseases have limited efficacy, are hampered by appearance of resistance and/or are toxic. There is therefore an urgent need to find new targets for the development of drugs,[24] and G4 could be an attractive alternative target. In fact, due to their roles in a number of biological processes, G4 have been proposed as potential therapeutic targets in cancer[25] and small molecule G4 ligands have been reported for the past 2 decades as antitumor drugs.[4d,26] G4 have also been suggested as targets for treating virus such as HIV, and several G4 ligands have been reported as potential drugs.[27] In the case of parasites, De Cian et al.[28] reported that several classical G4 ligands such as BRACO-19, TMPyP4, PIPER, telomestatin, and others were capable of binding the degenerative motif of P. falciparum telomere GGGTTYA. Actually, the Phen-DC family exhibited the most noticeable stabilization effect over all three PfTel tested, yet failed (as all the other compounds used) to discriminate against the hTel sequence. Similarly, the bis-quinacridine BOQ1 ligand showed binding to the UpsB-Q G-quadruplex, a G4 formed in an upstream regions of groupB var genes of P. falciparum.(12b) Recently, a bis-pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxaline family of compounds has been described to bind two PfTel G4 sequences and to display antimalarial activity,[29] and TMPyP4 and telomestatin were reported to inhibit 50% growth of P. falciparum at 5 and 35 μM concentration, respectively.[30] To the best of our knowledge, these are the only reported examples of G4 ligands with antiparasitic activity. In a previous work we synthesized and evaluated a new family of carbohydrate naphthalene diimide derivatives (carb-NDI) as G4-binders and antitumor drugs (Figure ).[31] The binding results to G4 targets and nuclear localization in cells suggested that this family of ligands interacts with G4 structures.
Figure 1

Carb-NDI family of G-quadruplex ligands studied in this work.

Carb-NDI family of G-quadruplex ligands studied in this work. The initial purpose of using sugar-conjugated anticancer drugs was to take advantage of the Warburg effect and the overexpression of GLUT transporters in cancer cells due to the high energy requirements.[32] We envisioned that sugar conjugation in antiparasitic drugs could be useful for a better uptake of the drug in the parasite. In fact, glucose transporters play a central role in their survival. The LGT family of transporters of Leishmania spp.[33] relate to the human GLUT1 in sequence and structure and have higher glucose affinity than the human counterpart.[34] Additionally, they have been found to be critical for parasite survival since LGT null mutants are more susceptible to oxidative stress and have reduced viability at high temperatures or under nutrient deficiency.[35] In Plasmodium falciparum, the PfHT1 protein has significant sequence identity to the human GLUT1[36] and broad specificity for hexoses. The main sugar transporter identified in the bloodstream form of Trypanosoma brucei is THT1 which is a low-affinity and high-capacity facilitative protein that takes advantage of the high concentration of glucose in the blood.[37] In this work, we have made a genomic search of PQS for T. brucei, L. major, and P. falciparum. We have localized G4 sequences in their genomes and evaluated their possible importance for the parasite survival. We have evaluated a unique G4 sequence found in T. brucei (EBR1) for its ability to form stable G-quadruplex using biophysical methods. Furthermore, the carbohydrate-NDIs have been investigated as potential ligands of EBR1 and evaluated as antitrypanosomal, antileishmanial, and antimalarial agents together with their toxicity in human cells and in zebrafish embryo. Finally, location of carb-NDIs inside T. brucei was also studied.

Results and Discussion

Putative G-Quadruplex Sequences (PQS) Search in T. brucei, P. falciparum, and L. major Genomes

The possibility of G-quadruplex formation was analyzed using the online algorithm software for PQS-search engine called QGRS Mapper since it is a user-friendly, commonly used algorithm.[38] The genomes were downloaded from tritrypDB (http://tritrypdb.org for T. brucei, version 5.1, accessed January 2016), the Sanger Institute (http://www.sanger.ac.uk for L. major, version 6.1, accessed June 2016), and plasmoDB (http://plasmodb.org for P. falciparum, version 3.0, accessed January 2016), and only the positive strands were included. The results were set to leave out overlapping PQS. Additional parameters were set to default (max length = 30, min G-group size = 3, loop size = 3–10). With these parameters, 466 PQS were found for P. falciparum, whereas Smargiasso et al.[12b] reported 891 PQS when searching through the whole genome. The resulting variation is probably due to the differences in the parameter criteria (Smargiasso used a loop range of 0–11) and in the genome version. A similar number of PQS (433) was also detected in T. brucei, although its genome is larger than the one of P. falciparum (32 vs 23 Mbp) and its composition is more GC-rich (45% T. brucei, 20% P. falciparum). L. major displayed 4719 PQS, 10 times more than T. brucei, despite having similar genomic size and a composition of 57% GC. Both of these genomic parameters cannot explain the big difference in PQS detection rates. These tendencies were better observed when comparing parasite PQS densities (number of PQS/10.000 bases) 0.15, 0.24, and 1.42 for T. brucei, P. falciparum, and L. major, respectively. Large differences were also observed between chromosomes. L. major’s chromosomes 4, 13, 17, 34, and 36 displayed very high PQS concentration, while chromosomes 12 and 14 of P. falciparum have a very low density of G4-prone sequences (Table S2 in Supporting Information). T. brucei displayed low PQS concentration in its entire genome. The relevance of the PQS found can be estimated based on the G-score, a validation system on QGRS-mapper. The algorithm tends to emphasize shorter loops with equal size and higher number of guanine tetrads. However, false positives (where high G-score PQS are unable to form G4) and false negatives (where low G-score PQS are able to form stable G4) are given sometimes as results. To solve these potential errors, several other algorithms have been developed, such as G4-hunter.[1e] G4-hunter validates PQS ability to form G4 by taking into account G-richness (G in sequence) and skewness (G/C asymmetry with the complementary strand) of the PQS area and thus drastically reduces false results. We decided to validate PQS results simply by frequency. Higher frequencies are in principle less prone to be random nucleotide sequences without a biological role. At the same time, all highly frequent PQS found for the examined parasites are verified G4-forming sequences. For L. major and T. brucei these PQS include the hTel sequence, and for P. falciparum the variety of PfTel sequences (Table ). In T. brucei we also found a highly frequent new nontelomeric sequence that however was given a poor G-score by the search engine. This sequence (EBR1) was found 33 times (Table ).
Table 1

Most Frequent PQS Found in L. major, T. brucei, and P. falciparum Genomes and Number of Occurrencesa

 PQSnamefrequency
L. majorGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGhTel465
 GGGAGGGAGGGAGGG 26
 GGGTGAGCGGGTGGGGGTCAGTGGG 22
 GGGGTGGGCCACGCGGGGACAGGACGGG 21
 GGGCGTGGGTGTGGGTGTGGG 19
 GGGCGAGGGGGAGGGGGGTGCTGGG 17
 GGGAAAAGAAGGGGAAGGGGTAGGG 16
 GGGTGGGTGGGTGGGT3069316
T. bruceiGGGCAGGGGGTGATGGGGAGGAGCCAGGGEBR133
 GGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGhTel26
 GGGAGAGGGAGAGGGAGAGGG 5
P. falciparumGGGTTTAGGGTTCAGGGTTTAGGGPfTel84
 GGGTTTAGGGTTTAGGGTTTAGGGPfTel67
 GGGTTCAGGGTTTAGGGTTCAGGGPfTel63
 GGGTTTAGGGTTTAGGGTTCAGGGPfTel63
 GGGTTCAGGGTTTAGGGTTTAGGGPfTel58
 GGGTTTAGGGTTCAGGGTTCAGGGPfTel26
 GGGTTCAGGGTTCAGGGTTTAGGGPfTel19

Frequency is the number of times the sequence occurs in the genome.

Frequency is the number of times the sequence occurs in the genome. When we checked the location of EBR1 in T. brucei genome, we found it was repeated 22 times between percentile 34.2 and 35.2 of chromosome 9, where it was located inside several genes coding, among others, for a purine nucleoside transporter (NT10), a calpain-like cysteine peptidase, an adenylosuccinate lyase, and other proteins with unknown function. The rest of the EBR1 sequences were found between percentile 6.6 and 6.9 of chromosome 11 and inside a gene coding for an iron/ascorbate oxidoreductase. The hTel sequences in L. major and T. brucei were mainly localized in the telomeric regions as expected. For T. brucei, some of these sequences were found to be in or in between VSG genes, yet also throughout nontelomeric areas affecting a trans-sialidase neuraminidase and several unknown proteins. PfTel sequences found in P. falciparum were mostly localized in the telomeric areas (percentile >99.9) and affecting PfEMP1 expressing genes as it was reported earlier.

G4 Formation by T. brucei EBR1 Sequence

Due to the novelty and frequency number in T. brucei genome, the EBR1 sequence (Table ) was selected and analyzed for its ability to form G-quadruplex. Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was first carried out in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of K+ to investigate G-quadruplex formation.[39] EBR1 CD spectra showed positive signals at 260 and 295 nm and a negative signal at 240 nm, suggesting a predominantly parallel G-quadruplex conformation (Figure a). When CD was recorded in sodium buffer conditions, the spectra were similar but with lower intensity (Figure S1). It is important to mention that G4 seems to be partially folded even in the absence of cations (Figure S1) and CD signals increase with accumulative amount of cations. Other examples have been reported of G4 formation in the absence or low concentration of monovalent cations.[40] A mutated EBR1 sequence (EBR1-mut) where several guanine residues were changed to adenine or thymine was also examined for comparison (Figure S2). In this case, no CD signals characteristic of G-quadruplex formation were detected and only small changes were observed after K+ or Na+ addition.
Figure 2

Characterization of EBR1 sequence: (a) CD spectra in the absence and presence of different concentrations of K+; (b) thermal difference spectra (TDS); (c) UV-monitored thermal denaturation experiment at 295 nm; (d) isothermal difference spectra at 25 °C (IDS).

Characterization of EBR1 sequence: (a) CD spectra in the absence and presence of different concentrations of K+; (b) thermal difference spectra (TDS); (c) UV-monitored thermal denaturation experiment at 295 nm; (d) isothermal difference spectra at 25 °C (IDS). UV thermal difference spectroscopy (TDS)[41] was recorded on EBR1 (Figure b) by subtracting spectra at 93.5 and 2.7 °C. Major positive peaks at 247, 257, and 274 nm, together with a negative peak at 296 nm, are a typical signature of G-quadruplex folding. UV melting[42] of EBR1 monitored at 295 nm showed the usual negative sigmoidal curve for G-quadruplex with a Tm value of 65 °C (Figure c). The reverse cooling experiment showed an almost overlapping curve (Figure c). IDS spectra on EBR1 were obtained by taking the difference between the absorbance spectra of folded and unfolded oligonucleotides. These spectra were respectively recorded before and after potassium cation addition (100 mM KCl) at 25 °C (Figure d). This signature is characteristic of a G4 structure, as in the case of the TDS spectra. The spectra showed major positive peaks at 244 and 274 nm with a negative peak at 296 nm. Proton NMR experiments were run on the unlabeled EBR1 sequence at 25 and 60 °C, close to the Tm measured by UV melting. Both spectra displayed the characteristic imino peaks in the 10–12 ppm range and none at higher field (Figure S3), suggesting the exclusive folding into G4 structures.[43] However, the spectra displayed a complex mixture of signals, indicating the coexistence of more than one conformation. Even close to the melting temperature a favored one could not be identified, suggesting that they all have similar stability. After validation of EBR1 folding into a G4 structure, we proceeded to test ligand binding. FAM and TAMRA fluorophores were attached to the 5′- and 3′-ends of EBR1 sequence (EBR1-FT; see Table S1) to run FRET experiments. Preliminary UV melting and CD experiments were carried out on EBR1-FT. The results demonstrated that the stability and folding topology are in good agreement with those obtained for the unlabeled EBR1 sequence (Figure S4). Next, two of our G-quadruplex ligands, the carb-NDI 6 and the reference aglycone-NDI (7), were tested for binding to the EBR1 G4 structure using FRET. Carb-NDIs 1–6 and aglycone NDI 7 have previously shown binding to several G-quadruplex structures (hTel, c-myc, human minisatellite, and Bombyx telomere) with certain selectivity for quadruplexes over DNA duplexes.[31] FRET-based melting assays were performed in the presence of 10 and 50 mM concentrations of K+, with 0.5, 1, and 2 μM of compound 6 or 7 and 0.2 μM of the oligonucleotide. Both compounds showed binding to EBR1, and ΔTm values were higher for aglycone-NDI 7 than for glcC2-NDI 6 (Figure A and Figure S5). This tendency had been observed previously for the same ligands 6 and 7 when binding to other G4 structures. Yet, ΔTm values obtained for EBR1 were lower than those seen with the hTel sequence (at 10 mM K+ and 2 μM compound, 19 °C for compound 7, and 10 °C for compound 6). CD titrations with carb-NDIs 6 and 7 on EBR1 also confirmed binding (Figure B and Figure C). An increase in the 290 nm band and a decrease in the 265 nm band were clearly observed upon addition of increasing concentrations of the ligands. These binding results indicate that ligands 6 and 7 not only bind to the T. brucei telomeric sequence but also bind to other G4 structures found within the T. brucei genome.
Figure 3

(A) FRET melting assay. Thermal stabilization induced by the tested compounds 6 and 7 (0.5, 1, and 2 μM) on the EBR1-FT (fluorescently labeled) quadruplex (0.2 μM) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate, pH 7.2, containing 10 mM KCl + 90 mM LiCl or 50 mM KCl + 50 mM LiCl. (B) CD titration of compound 6 on the EBR1-FT quadruplex (3 μM) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate (pH 7.2) containing 100 mM KCl. (C) CD titration of compound 7 on the EBR1-FT quadruplex (3 μM) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate (pH 7.2) containing 100 mM KCl.

(A) FRET melting assay. Thermal stabilization induced by the tested compounds 6 and 7 (0.5, 1, and 2 μM) on the EBR1-FT (fluorescently labeled) quadruplex (0.2 μM) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate, pH 7.2, containing 10 mM KCl + 90 mM LiCl or 50 mM KCl + 50 mM LiCl. (B) CD titration of compound 6 on the EBR1-FT quadruplex (3 μM) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate (pH 7.2) containing 100 mM KCl. (C) CD titration of compound 7 on the EBR1-FT quadruplex (3 μM) in 10 mM lithium cacodylate (pH 7.2) containing 100 mM KCl.

Antiparasitic Activity and Toxicity of G4 Ligands

The in vitro antiparasitic activities of carb-NDI G4 ligands (1–7) were evaluated against bloodstream forms of T. brucei brucei, against promastigotes of L. major, and against P. falciparum (Table ). Cytotoxicity values of these compounds against a human nontumoral lung cell line (MRC-5) were recently reported and are also included in the table.[31] Selectivity indices (SI) were calculated according to the formula IC50(MRC-5)/IC50(parasite). Pyridostatin, BRACO-19, and TmPyP4 were used as alternative G-quadruplex ligands for comparison. Suramin, miltefosine, and chloroquine were used as positive drug controls for T. brucei, L. major, and P. falciparum, respectively.
Table 2

Compound Antiparasitic Activity against All Three Parasites and Cytotoxicity Values for MRC5 Control Cell Line of the G4 Ligands 1–7 plus Three Classical G4 Binders and Selectivity Values

 IC50 parasite (μM)
SIa
 L. majorT. bruceiP. falciparumMRC-5bL. majorT. bruceiP. falciparum
1 β-glc-NDI0.244 ± 0.0070.024 ± 0.0011.350 ± 0.6361.15 ± 0.294.747.90.9
2 β-glcNAc-NDI1.041 ± 0.0270.089 ± 0.0070.360 ± 0.0710.51 ± 0.010.55.71.4
3 β-6dglc-NDI0.184 ± 0.0090.017 ± 0.0070.225 ± 0.1200.91 ± 0.324.953.54.0
4 β-malt-NDI0.921 ± 0.0510.099 ± 0.0100.370 ± 0.0852.04 ± 0.052.220.65.5
5 α-manC2-NDI0.306 ± 0.0190.021 ± 0.0030.180 ± 0.0990.81 ± 0.442.638.64.5
6 β-glcC2-NDI0.537 ± 0.0300.017 ± 0.0090.275 ± 0.1910.71 ± 0.251.341.82.6
7 NDI-prop0.034 ± 0.0050.009 ± 0.0010.091 ± 0.0130.36 ± 0.1610.640.04.0
pyridostatin5.00 ± 0.017.82 ± 0.202.65 ± 1.775.38 ± 0.071.10.72.0
BRACO-1912.73 ± 0.475.51 ± 0.999.70 ± 4.678.33 ± 2.960.71.50.9
TMPyP420.82 ± 4.86>10>25>25>1.7  
chloroquine  0.0096 ± 0.003    
suramin 0.038 ± 0.003     
miltefosine6.07 ± 0.37      

SI = selectivity index (IC50(MRC-5)/IC50(parasite)).

From ref (30).

SI = selectivity index (IC50(MRC-5)/IC50(parasite)). From ref (30). Carb-NDI G4 ligands (1–6) presented the best antiparasitic activity against T. brucei with IC50 values between 17 and 24 nM except for compounds 2 and 4 which were slightly less potent (89 and 99 nM, respectively). Compounds 1–6 were more effective against T. brucei than against HT-29, MCF-7, and HeLa cancer cells (IC50 values from 0.1 to 2.9 μM), with aglycone-NDI 7 displaying the lowest IC50 of the series in a similar way to the tendency found in cancerous cells.[31] IC50 values for most of these G-quadruplex ligands are in the same range as that of the commercial drug suramin, used to treat sleeping sickness. At the same time, the selectivity indexes (IC50(MRC-5)/IC50(parasite)) for compounds 1–7 were quite high ranging from 38.6 to 53.5 except for compounds 2 and 4 (5.7 and 20.6, respectively). It is important to note that classical G-quadruplex ligands such as pyridostatin, BRACO-19, and TMPyP4 showed IC50 values in the micromolar range, far higher than those obtained for compounds 1–7. Differences in drug uptake and/or binding to specific G4 targets such as EBR1 may explain these data. In the cases of L. major and P. falciparum, all IC50 values for Carb-NDI G4 ligands (1–6) and aglycone NDI (7) were higher than those found for T. brucei, although most of them remain in the submicromolar range. This lower effect could be due to differences in drug uptake by the different parasites. Again, aglycone-NDI 7 showed the best antiparasitic activity of the series in both cases, with the carb-NDI presenting slightly higher values (5- to 30-fold in L. major and 2- to 15-fold in P. falciparum). The selectivity index of ligands 1–7 was smaller for these two parasites ranging from 0.5 to 10.6 for L. major and from 0.9 to 5.5 for P. falciparum. We had previously observed differences in antitumor activity depending on how the carbohydrate was attached to the NDI core.[31] For example, compound 6 where the glucose is attached through an ethyl spacer is approximately 10-fold more active than compound 1 where it is directly attached to the core. In the case of their antiparasitic activity, the sugar presentation in the carb-NDI did not show differences except for P. falciparum where compound 6 was 5-fold more active than compound 1. Lastly, the classical G-quadruplex ligands investigated in L. major and P. falciparum (pyridostatin, BRACO-19, and TMPyP4) displayed IC50 values in the micromolar range, being quite less potent than ligands 1–7. Next, taking advantage of the intrinsic fluorescence of NDI derivatives β-glcC2-NDI 6 (λem = 578 nm, exciting at the maximum absorbance, λexc = 517 nm, in buffered conditions at pH 7.4, Figure S6) and aglycone-NDI 7 (λem = 598 nm, λexc = 538 nm, Figure S6), we investigated their localization in T. brucei by confocal microscopy. After 30 min of incubation at 37 °C, both compounds were detected inside the parasites and aglycone-NDI 7 was mainly found in the nucleus and in the kinetoplast (Figure ). When longer incubation times (150 min) were used, both compounds localized mainly in the nucleus and in the kinetoplast. We had previously observed a similar uptake trend in HT-29 colon cancer cells and MRC-5 noncancerous cells[31] where aglycone-NDI 7 entered more rapidly into the cells than carb-NDI derivatives, but at longer times all compounds eventually localized within the nucleus. These results suggest that such G4-ligands could reach and possibly target G-quadruplex structures found in the parasite’s genome, such as the telomeric sequence and/or EBR1 sequence.
Figure 4

Confocal images of T. brucei parasites after incubation at 5 μM concentration with aglycone-NDI 7 for 30 min (b) or 150 min (c) and with β-glcC2-NDI 6 for 30 min (d) or 150 min (e). Control parasites are shown in (a). Scale bar: 5 μm.

Confocal images of T. brucei parasites after incubation at 5 μM concentration with aglycone-NDI 7 for 30 min (b) or 150 min (c) and with β-glcC2-NDI 6 for 30 min (d) or 150 min (e). Control parasites are shown in (a). Scale bar: 5 μm. As G-quadruplex ligands 1–7 have shown nanomolar activity against T. brucei and selectivity indexes higher than 40, we decided to perform preliminary toxicity assays in the zebrafish embryo model before future investigation in a mice model of the disease. High fecundity, rapid embryonic development, and high homology to mammalian species make zebrafish a cost-effective model for toxicity screening.[44] Moreover, the embryo is preferred to adult fish because it is predicted that early life stages feel less pain and distress than adult fish. Fast acute toxicity was measured by incubation of zebrafish embryos with increasing concentration of each compound and cumulative mortality/toxicity was observed after 96 hpf (hours postfertilization).[45] It is important to note that cumulative mortality/toxicity is due to both developmental impact and organotoxicity. This methodology is becoming more frequently used by medicinal chemists.[46] Table shows NOEC, LOEC, and LC50 values for acute toxicity on zebrafish embryos and calculated LD50 values on mice for G-quadruplex ligands 1–7. Conversion of LC50 values on zebrafish embryo to LD50 values on mice was carried out by correlation as suggested by Ali et al.[47] after a large-scale comparison of toxicity in both animal models for 60 water-soluble compounds (Table ). Interestingly, β-6dglc-NDI (3) and β-malt-NDI (4), two compounds with low toxicity on MRC-5 cells, were estimated to be the most toxic compounds in mice. On the contrary, glucose or mannose conjugation to the aglycone NDI-prop (such as in compounds 5 and 6) seems to mitigate the unspecific toxicity associated with these naphthalene diimide ligands. These results point to the relevance that carbohydrate conjugation of G-quadruplex ligands may have on the final toxicity of the compound.
Table 3

NOEC, LOEC, and LC50 Values for Acute Toxicity on Zebrafish Embryos and Calculated LD50 Values on Mice for G-Quadruplex Ligands 1–7a

compdNOEC (μM)LOEC (μM)LC50 (mmol/L)LD50b (mmol/kg) miceLD50b (mg/kg) mice
(1) β-glc-NDI100NA>1>0.63>580
(2) β-glcNAc-NDI100NA>1>0.63>607
(3) β-6dglc-NDI100NA0.170.17154
(4) β-malt-NDI100NA0.190.19206
(5) β-manC2-NDI100NA>1>0.63>609
(6) β-glcC2-NDI100NA>1>0.63>609
(7) NDI-prop10010000.410.33178

LC50 (median lethal dose), calculated by fitting sigmoidal curve to mortality data (y = Bot + (Top – Bot)/{1 + 10[}. Bot, minimum mortality; Top, maximum mortality; k, curve slope; x0, LC50 estimated. NOEC: no observed effect concentration, with mortality score of >20% assumed as the effect. LOEC: lowest observed effect concentration, with mortality score of >20% assumed as the effect.

Extrapolated according to ref (43).

LC50 (median lethal dose), calculated by fitting sigmoidal curve to mortality data (y = Bot + (Top – Bot)/{1 + 10[}. Bot, minimum mortality; Top, maximum mortality; k, curve slope; x0, LC50 estimated. NOEC: no observed effect concentration, with mortality score of >20% assumed as the effect. LOEC: lowest observed effect concentration, with mortality score of >20% assumed as the effect. Extrapolated according to ref (43).

Conclusions

Increasing evidence suggests that G4 plays an important role in gene regulation in many organisms. Here, we completed PQS searches on the genome of T. brucei, L. major, and P. falciparum. Several interesting PQS were found, including EBR1 on T. brucei, which was also confirmed to form stable G4 structures through biophysical assays. The hTel sequences were also found abundantly in the trypanosomatid parasites in long islands of repetitions. G-quadruplex ligands such as β-glcC2-NDI 6 and aglycone-NDI 7, which were previously reported to bind to several G4 structures including hTel, were also capable of binding EBR1 G4, found only in the genome of T. brucei. At the same time, the carb-NDI family and the aglycone NDI prop 7 showed antiparasitic activity against T. brucei, L. major, and P. falciparum. These G-quadruplex ligands were especially effective against T. brucei where they also showed a quite high selectivity versus the human control cell line MRC-5. Confocal microscopy studies localized β-glcC2-NDI 6 and aglycone-NDI 7 in the nucleus and kinetoplast of T. brucei indicating that G4 structures could be their actual targets. Finally, glucose and mannose conjugation to toxic and potent G4-ligands could be an effective strategy in tuning down unspecific drug toxicity.

Experimental Section

Compound Synthesis and Purity

Compound synthesis was carried out as previously reported.[31] The purity of all compounds tested was ≥95% and was confirmed by reverse phase HPLC by applying different elution systems and detecting the UV absorption.

Oligonucleotides

All oligonucleotides (Table S1) were purchased from Eurogentec (Belgium) and used without further purification for FRET and CD experiments. NMR samples were purified by centrifugation on 5 kDa filters. Oligonucleotide stock solutions (around 500 μM) were prepared in Milli-Q water and stored at −20 °C. The exact stock concentrations were determined from the absorbance at 260 nm. For FRET melting and CD experiments, the compounds were solubilized in Milli-Q water at concentrations of either 5 or 10 mM, depending on the solubility of the compound.

FRET Melting Assays

The ligand-induced thermal stabilizations (ΔT1/2) were determined from the difference between the temperature of mid-transition measured without and with the appropriate concentration of ligand, with a final oligonucleotide strand concentration of 0.2 μM. Three independent experiments were conducted on a Stratagene Mx3005P real-time PCR equipment using duplicate conditions in 96-well plates. The excitation wavelength was set to 492 nm and the emission recorded at 516 nm. The temperature profile consisted of an initial stabilization at 25 °C for 5 min followed by a 1 °C by minute increase until 95 °C. The induced stabilization was measured in 10 mM lithium cacodylate (pH 7.2) supplemented with 10 mM KCl and 90 mM LiCl.

Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy

CD spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a Jasco J-815 equipped with a Peltier temperature controller. Each spectrum corresponds to the average of three scans measured in 1 cm path length quartz cells at 100 nm min–1 (bandwidth of 2 nm, data integration time of 1 s). The oligonucleotides were prefolded at 4 μM in 10 mM lithium cacodylate (pH 7.2) and with the relevant amount of KCl or NaCl. The ligand concentration was adapted to reach the desired ratio (between 1:0 and 1:10), in 100 mM KCl.

Cell Culture

MRC5 cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in 100% of humidity in low glucose (1 g/L) DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (hiFBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin.

In Vitro Antitrypanosomal Activity

Bloodstream forms (BSF) of T. brucei brucei “single marker” S427 (S16) were grown at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in HMI-9 medium supplemented with 10% hiFBS. Drug susceptibility assay was performed as described in Carvalho et al.[48] Briefly, parasites (1 × 104 BSF per mL) were incubated in 96-well plates with increasing concentration of drugs/compounds for 72 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2 in culture medium. Cell proliferation was determined using the alamarBlue assay[49] in vitro. Fluorescence was recorded with an Infinite F200 microplate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Austria) equipped with 550 and 590 nm filters for excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively.

In Vitro Antileishmanial Activity

The experiments of drug susceptibility on L. major (MHOM/IL/80/Friedlin) were carried out as described previously.[50] Briefly, 1 × 106 promastigotes per mL were incubated for 72 h at 28 °C in 96-well plates in modified RPMI-1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) plus 10% hiFBS, containing increasing concentration of drugs. Cell proliferation was determined using a MTT-based assay.[51] The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 540 nm.

In Vitro Antimalarial Activity

Drug effects on in vitro P. falciparum growth were measured in microtiter plates according to Desjardins et al.[52] The final volume in each well was 200 μL, consisting of 50 μL of complete medium (RPMI 1640 + 10% AB human serum) without (controls) or with drug and 150 μL of P. falciparum infected erythrocyte (3D7 strain) suspension (1.5% final hematocrit and 0.6% parasitemia). The drugs dissolved in DMSO were diluted in complete medium so that the final DMSO concentration never exceeded 0.25%. After 48 h incubation at 37 °C, 30 μL of complete medium containing 0.6 μCi [3H]-hypoxanthine were added to each well. After 18 h at 37 °C, cells were lyzed using an automatic cell harvester, and the parasite macromolecules, including radioactive nucleic acids, were retained onto glass fiber filters. The filters were counted for radioactivity, after adding scintillation cocktail, in a liquid scintillation spectrometer. Radioactivity background was obtained from incubation of noninfected erythrocytes under the same condition and deduced. Parasitic viability was expressed as IC50 which is the drug concentration leading to 50% parasite growth inhibition.

Cytotoxicity Assay

MRC5 cells were harvested by trypsinization (0.25%) and seeded in 96-well plates (5000 cells in 100 μL/well) in the presence of increasing concentrations of NDI-compounds. Cellular toxicity was determined using the colorimetric MTT-based assay after incubation at 37 °C for or 72 h.[51] The results are expressed as the concentration of compound that reduces cell growth by 50% versus untreated control cells (IC50).

Zebrafish Toxicity

Acute toxicity assay was carried out by Zeclinics (Barcelona, Spain). Lyophilized compounds were dissolved in 100% DMSO. DMSO volume was calculated for a 100 mM stock solution. To proceed to zebrafish embryo drug incubation, compounds were diluted in 1 mL of 0.1% DMSO/E3 medium to obtain 5 logarithmic concentrations: 0.01 μM, 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, and 100 μM (for drugs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) and 0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, and 1 mM (for drugs 8, 9, 10).

Zebrafish Embryos Preparation

Fertilized embryos of zebrafish (Danio rerio), strain AB, were collected in E3 medium in Petri dishes. At 3 h postfertilization (hpf), after abnormal or not fertilized embryos were discarded, 20 healthy embryos per condition were placed in wells of a 24-well plate. Once embryos were placed in each well, E3 medium was replaced by the different dilutions prepared previously for every compound and concentration.

Acute Toxicity Assay

Embryos were grown from 3 hpf to 96 hpf at 28.5 °C. At 96 h [53] after treatment mortality LC50 will be determined: LC50 (median lethal dose), calculated by fitting sigmoidal curve to mortality data (y = Bot + (Top – Bot)/(1 + 10[). Bot, minimum mortality; Top, maximum mortality; k, curve slope; x0, LC50 estimated. Negative control:[54] 0.1% DMSO, in three replicates. Positive controls: 4-diethylaminobenzaldehyde (DEAB) at five different concentrations (0.1 μM, 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, 1 mM). DEAB is a competitive inhibitor of aldehyde dehydrogenases known to generate toxic and teratogenic effects.

Absorption and Fluorescence Spectra

Absorption and emission spectra were recorded in (1.0–1.5) × 10–5 M aqueous solutions (buffered at pH 7.4, 1 × 10–3 M Tris-HCl) on a JASCO V-550 UV/vis spectrophotometer and on a PerkinElmer LS-65 fluorometer, respectively. The molar absorptivity has been calculated applying the Beer–Lambert relationship to three independent measurements. Fluorescence spectra were measured using 1 nm steps and 0.5–1 s dwell time. Right angle detection was used. All the measurements were carried out at 22 °C in quartz cuvettes with path length of 1 cm. The fluorescence spectra were measured in air-equilibrated solutions absorbing less than 0.1 at all wavelengths to avoid inner filter effects and reabsorption of emission.

Confocal Microscopy

T. brucei parasites were incubated with 5 μM NDI compounds in 0.5 mL of each respective medium for 30 and 150 min at 37 °C and 100% of humidity. Then the parasites were fixed with paraformaldeide 4% for 30 min, washed twice in cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and processed by microscope observation. Images were acquired using a Leica SP5 confocal microscope (exciting at 488 nm and detecting the emission between 540 and 650 nm), while the images were deconvoluted using Huygens Professional image processing software from Scientific Volume Imaging (http://www.svi.nl). The merge of the images were made with Fiji software (https://fiji.sc/).
  81 in total

Review 1.  The structures of quadruplex nucleic acids and their drug complexes.

Authors:  Stephen Neidle
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Differential regulation of multiple glucose transporter genes in Leishmania mexicana.

Authors:  R J Burchmore; S M Landfear
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-10-30       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Targeting promoter G-quadruplex DNAs by indenopyrimidine-based ligands.

Authors:  K V Diveshkumar; Saaz Sakrikar; S Harikrishna; V Dhamodharan; P I Pradeepkumar
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 4.  Parasitism and chromosome dynamics in protozoan parasites: is there a connection?

Authors:  M Lanzer; K Fischer; S M Le Blancq
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  A dynamic G-quadruplex region regulates the HIV-1 long terminal repeat promoter.

Authors:  Rosalba Perrone; Matteo Nadai; Ilaria Frasson; Jerrod A Poe; Elena Butovskaya; Thomas E Smithgall; Manlio Palumbo; Giorgio Palù; Sara N Richter
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  A Polymerase Theta-dependent repair pathway suppresses extensive genomic instability at endogenous G4 DNA sites.

Authors:  Wouter Koole; Robin van Schendel; Andrea E Karambelas; Jane T van Heteren; Kristy L Okihara; Marcel Tijsterman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Quantitative assessment of antimalarial activity in vitro by a semiautomated microdilution technique.

Authors:  R E Desjardins; C J Canfield; J D Haynes; J D Chulay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Large-scale assessment of the zebrafish embryo as a possible predictive model in toxicity testing.

Authors:  Shaukat Ali; Harald G J van Mil; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genomic distribution and functional analyses of potential G-quadruplex-forming sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Steve G Hershman; Qijun Chen; Julia Y Lee; Marina L Kozak; Peng Yue; Li-San Wang; F Brad Johnson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  G-quadruplexes: the beginning and end of UTRs.

Authors:  Julian Leon Huppert; Anthony Bugaut; Sunita Kumari; Shankar Balasubramanian
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Iron and Heme Metabolism at the Leishmania-Host Interface.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Laranjeira-Silva; Iqbal Hamza; José M Pérez-Victoria
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2020-01-28

2.  Studying the Dynamics of a Complex G-Quadruplex System: Insights into the Comparison of MD and NMR Data.

Authors:  Matteo Castelli; Filippo Doria; Mauro Freccero; Giorgio Colombo; Elisabetta Moroni
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.578

3.  Design, synthesis, and antiprotozoal evaluation of new 2,4-bis[(substituted-aminomethyl)phenyl]quinoline, 1,3-bis[(substituted-aminomethyl)phenyl]isoquinoline and 2,4-bis[(substituted-aminomethyl)phenyl]quinazoline derivatives.

Authors:  Jean Guillon; Anita Cohen; Clotilde Boudot; Alessandra Valle; Vittoria Milano; Rabindra Nath Das; Aurore Guédin; Stéphane Moreau; Luisa Ronga; Solène Savrimoutou; Maxime Demourgues; Elodie Reviriego; Sandra Rubio; Sandie Ferriez; Patrice Agnamey; Cécile Pauc; Serge Moukha; Pascale Dozolme; Sophie Da Nascimento; Pierre Laumaillé; Anne Bouchut; Nadine Azas; Jean-Louis Mergny; Catherine Mullié; Pascal Sonnet; Bertrand Courtioux
Journal:  J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 5.051

4.  More is not always better: finding the right trade-off between affinity and selectivity of a G-quadruplex ligand.

Authors:  Michela Zuffo; Aurore Guédin; Emma-Dune Leriche; Filippo Doria; Valentina Pirota; Valérie Gabelica; Jean-Louis Mergny; Mauro Freccero
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Stiff-Stilbene Ligands Target G-Quadruplex DNA and Exhibit Selective Anticancer and Antiparasitic Activity.

Authors:  Michael P O'Hagan; Pablo Peñalver; Rosina S L Gibson; Juan C Morales; M Carmen Galan
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Conserved G-Quadruplex Motifs in Gene Promoter Region Reveals a Novel Therapeutic Approach to Target Multi-Drug Resistance Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  Uma Shankar; Neha Jain; Subodh Kumar Mishra; Tarun Kumar Sharma; Amit Kumar
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Parasitic Protozoa: Unusual Roles for G-Quadruplexes in Early-Diverging Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Franck Dumetz; Catherine J Merrick
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Mapping and characterization of G-quadruplexes in the genome of the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Mona Saad; Aurore Guédin; Souheila Amor; Amina Bedrat; Nicolas J Tourasse; Hussein Fayyad-Kazan; Geneviève Pratviel; Laurent Lacroix; Jean-Louis Mergny
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Naphthalene Diimides as Multimodal G-Quadruplex-Selective Ligands.

Authors:  Valentina Pirota; Matteo Nadai; Filippo Doria; Sara N Richter
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  The Presence and Localization of G-Quadruplex Forming Sequences in the Domain of Bacteria.

Authors:  Martin Bartas; Michaela Čutová; Václav Brázda; Patrik Kaura; Jiří Šťastný; Jan Kolomazník; Jan Coufal; Pratik Goswami; Jiří Červeň; Petr Pečinka
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.