M R K Mookiah1, A Rohrmeier2,3, M Dieckmeyer4, K Mei4, F K Kopp4, P B Noel4, J S Kirschke3, T Baum3, K Subburaj5. 1. Pillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Department of Radiology, Klinikum Landshut Achdorf, Landshut, Germany. 3. Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 4. Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. Pillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore, Singapore. subburaj@sutd.edu.sg.
Abstract
This study investigated the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT exams using texture analysis. The results showed an acceptable reproducibility of texture features, and these features could discriminate healthy/osteoporotic fracture cohort with an accuracy of 83%. INTRODUCTION: This aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT exams using texture analysis. METHODS: We performed texture analysis at the spine in routine MDCT exams and investigated the effect of intravenous contrast medium (IVCM) (n = 7), slice thickness (n = 7), the long-term reproducibility (n = 9), and the ability to differentiate healthy/osteoporotic fracture cohort (n = 9 age and gender matched pairs). Eight texture features were extracted using gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). The independent sample t test was used to rank the features of healthy/fracture cohort and classification was performed using support vector machine (SVM). RESULTS: The results revealed significant correlations between texture parameters derived from MDCT scans with and without IVCM (r up to 0.91) slice thickness of 1 mm versus 2 and 3 mm (r up to 0.96) and scan-rescan (r up to 0.59). The performance of the SVM classifier was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and revealed an average classification accuracy of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at the spine using specific texture parameters (energy, entropy, and homogeneity) and SVM can be performed in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT exams.
This study investigated the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT exams using texture analysis. The results showed an acceptable reproducibility of texture features, and these features could discriminate healthy/osteoporotic fracture cohort with an accuracy of 83%. INTRODUCTION: This aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT exams using texture analysis. METHODS: We performed texture analysis at the spine in routine MDCT exams and investigated the effect of intravenous contrast medium (IVCM) (n = 7), slice thickness (n = 7), the long-term reproducibility (n = 9), and the ability to differentiate healthy/osteoporotic fracture cohort (n = 9 age and gender matched pairs). Eight texture features were extracted using gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). The independent sample t test was used to rank the features of healthy/fracture cohort and classification was performed using support vector machine (SVM). RESULTS: The results revealed significant correlations between texture parameters derived from MDCT scans with and without IVCM (r up to 0.91) slice thickness of 1 mm versus 2 and 3 mm (r up to 0.96) and scan-rescan (r up to 0.59). The performance of the SVM classifier was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation and revealed an average classification accuracy of 83%. CONCLUSIONS:Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at the spine using specific texture parameters (energy, entropy, and homogeneity) and SVM can be performed in routine contrast-enhanced MDCT exams.
Entities:
Keywords:
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening; Spine; Texture analysis; Trabecular bone microstructure
Authors: Jan S Bauer; Irina Sidorenko; Dirk Mueller; Thomas Baum; Ahi Sema Issever; Felix Eckstein; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Christoph W Raeth Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; Thomas Baum; Kai Mei; Felix K Kopp; Georg Kaissis; Peter Foehr; Peter B Noel; Jan S Kirschke; Karupppasamy Subburaj Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: Terri J Vrtiska; Robert P Hartman; James M Kofler; Michael R Bruesewitz; Bernard F King; Cynthia H McCollough Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Thomas Baum; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Rainer Burgkart; Olga Gordijenko; Hans Liebl; Pia M Jungmann; Michael Gruber; Tina Zahel; Ernst J Rummeny; Simone Waldt; Jan S Bauer Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Nithin Manohar Rayudu; Michael Dieckmeyer; Maximilian T Löffler; Peter B Noël; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Karupppasamy Subburaj Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Michael Dieckmeyer; Stephanie Inhuber; Sarah Schlaeger; Dominik Weidlich; Muthu Rama Krishnan Mookiah; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Egon Burian; Nico Sollmann; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Thomas Baum Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-02-04
Authors: F T Gassert; A Kufner; F G Gassert; Y Leonhardt; S Kronthaler; B J Schwaiger; C Boehm; M R Makowski; J S Kirschke; T Baum; D C Karampinos; A S Gersing Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-09-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Michael Dieckmeyer; Nico Sollmann; Malek El Husseini; Anjany Sekuboyina; Maximilian T Löffler; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Thomas Baum Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 5.555
Authors: Nico Sollmann; Nithin Manohar Rayudu; John Jie Sheng Lim; Michael Dieckmeyer; Egon Burian; Maximilian T Löffler; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas Baum; Karupppasamy Subburaj Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2021-07
Authors: S S Karhula; M A J Finnilä; S J O Rytky; D M Cooper; J Thevenot; M Valkealahti; K P H Pritzker; M Haapea; A Joukainen; P Lehenkari; H Kröger; R K Korhonen; H J Nieminen; S Saarakkala Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2019-10-03 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Nico Sollmann; Edoardo A Becherucci; Christof Boehm; Malek El Husseini; Stefan Ruschke; Egon Burian; Jan S Kirschke; Thomas M Link; Karupppasamy Subburaj; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Roland Krug; Thomas Baum; Michael Dieckmeyer Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 5.555