| Literature DB >> 35002967 |
Pianpian Chen1, Yunfei Zha1, Li Wang1, Liang Li1, Lei Hu1, Dong Xing1, Baiyu Liu1, Liu Yang1, Qi Yang1, Changsheng Liu1, Huan Liu2, Weiyin Liu3.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether the microvascular permeability of lumbar marrow and bone trabecular changes in early-stage diabetic rabbits can be quantitatively evaluated using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), quantitative computed tomography, and texture-analyzed permeability parameter Ktrans map of DCE-MRI. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: DCE-MRI; Diabetes MILES Study; lumbar marrow; quantitative CT; texture analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002967 PMCID: PMC8728072 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.785604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Figure 1Sagittal scan of lumbar spine in rabbits (white arrow). (A) Enhanced scan image. (B) T2-weighted imaging (T2WI). (C) T1WI.
Figure 2The postprocessing images of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). (A) Enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) map, (B) K, (C) K, (D) V, and (E) V map of the 16th-week normal rabbits. The lumbar vertebra region of interest was manually drawn (red area).
Figure 3Illustration of the outlined region of interest on postprocessed quantitative computed tomography.
Figure 4H&E staining (×50) of rabbit lumbar vertebrae in the control group at the 16th week. (A) Marks (blue dots) and (B) sketches (green color) of the trabecular bone were performed using the Image-Pro Plus software.
Group differences of BMD values in the lumbar vertebrae.
| Time | Diabetes group | Control group |
| P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 week | 522.81 ± 58.44 | 531.25 ± 56.29 | 0.265 | 0.796 |
| 4 weeks | 514.45 ± 54.22 | 525.28 ± 63.48 | 0.327 | 0.75 |
| 8 weeks | 510.39 ± 88.04 | 520.95 ± 44.87 | 0.266 | 0.789 |
| 12 weeks | 464.63 ± 58.73 | 519.53 ± 44.97 | 1.909 | 0.083 |
| 16 weeks | 451.69 ± 46.17 | 502.63 ± 39.35 | 2.151 | 0.055 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
BMD, bone marrow density.
Figure 5Bone marrow density (BMD) changes in the diabetic and control rabbit lumbar vertebrae over time.
Group comparison of K-derived texture parameters at the same time points.
| Indicators | Control group | Diabetic group | Z | P-value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | P25 | P75 | Median | P25 | P75 | ||||
| T0 | |||||||||
|
| 0.500 | 0.330 | 1.000 | 0.330 | 0.200 | 1.000 | -3.195 | 0.001 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | -3.605 | <0.001 | |
|
| 0.500 | 0.330 | 1.000 | 0.330 | 0.200 | 1.000 | -3.195 | 0.001 | |
| T1 | |||||||||
|
| 1.000 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 0.250 | 1.000 | -3.646 | <0.001 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -2.322 | 0.020 | |
|
| 1.000 | 0.500 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 0.250 | 1.000 | -3.646 | <0.001 | |
| T2 | |||||||||
|
| 0.500 | 0.290 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 1.000 | -2.195 | 0.028 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -2.938 | 0.003 | |
|
| 0.500 | 0.290 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 1.000 | -2.195 | 0.028 | |
| T3 | |||||||||
|
| 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 0.250 | 1.000 | -2.957 | 0.003 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -5.474 | 0.000 | |
|
| 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.500 | 0.250 | 1.000 | -2.957 | 0.003 | |
| T4 | |||||||||
|
| 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.330 | 1.000 | -2.448 | 0.014 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -3.350 | 0.001 | |
|
| 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.330 | 1.000 | -2.448 | 0.014 | |
Represented that the difference between the normal group and the control group at the same time point was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Area under the ROC curve shows the diagnostic ability of lumbar bone marrow texture differentiation by comparing the texture parameters at week 12 when taking week 8 as baseline.
| Area under the curve | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test result variable(s) | Area | Std. error | Asymptotic sig. | Asymptotic 95% confidence interval | |
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||
|
| 0.734 | 0.136 | 0.115 | 0.469 | 1.000 |
|
| 0.766 | 0.128 | 0.074 | 0.516 | 1.000 |
|
| 0.734 | 0.136 | 0.115 | 0.469 | 1.000 |
Test result variable(s): Ktrans-Entropy has at least one tie between the positive actual state group and the negative actual state group. Statistics may be biased.
Under the nonparametric assumption.
Null hypothesis: true area = 0.5.
ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Area under the ROC curve shows the diagnostic ability of the texture parameters at week 16 compared with week 12 at baseline.
| Area under the curve | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test result variable(s) | Area | Std. error | Asymptotic Sig.
| Asymptotic 95% confidence interval | |
| Lower bound | Upper bound | ||||
|
| 0.508 | 0.153 | 0.958 | 0.208 | 0.808 |
|
| 0.594 | 0.148 | 0.529 | 0.304 | 0.884 |
|
| 0.508 | 0.153 | 0.958 | 0.208 | 0.808 |
Test result variable(s): Ktrans-Energy, Ktrans-Entropy, and Ktrans-UPP have at least one tie between the positive actual state group and the negative actual state group. Statistics may be biased.
Under the nonparametric assumption.
Null hypothesis: true area = 0.5.
ROC, receiver operating characteristic; UPP, uniformized positive pixel.
Figure 6Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrate the diagnostic ability in the differentiation of lumbar bone marrow texture between groups at the 12th week.
Figure 7Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrate the diagnostic ability in the differentiation of lumbar bone marrow texture between groups at the eighth week.
Pearson correlation coefficients of BMMP parameters and BMD.
| Correlation with BMD | r | P |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0.134 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.299 | <0.001 |
|
| -0.252 | <0.001 |
|
| -0.038 | 0.373 |
BMMP, bone marrow microvascular permeability; BMD, bone marrow density.
Figure 8H&E staining (×400) of rabbit lumbar vertebrae in the diabetic group (A) and the control group (B) at the 16th week. The rabbit lumbar trabecular bone was more densely distributed and had a larger area in the control group than in the diabetic group (arrow).
Comparison of the number of trabecular bone and trabecular bone area in the diabetic and control groups at the 16th week.
| 16th week | Diabetes group | Control group |
| P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tb.N | ||||
| 6.00 (4.00–11.00) | 21.50 (17.50–26.00) | 3.863 | <0.001 | |
| Tb.Ar | ||||
| 574,017.64 (279,256.13–847,322.88) | 1,825,414.82 (1,307,484.69–2,063,523.82) | 3.627 | <0.001 |
Data are expressed as mean (range).
Tb.N, trabecular bone number; Tb.Ar, trabecular bone area.
Figure 9CD34 immunohistochemical staining (×200) of the rabbit lumbar bone marrow in the diabetic group (A) and the control group (B) at the 16th week. The number of cells in the lumbar bone marrow was significantly increased in the diabetic group compared with that in the control group.