Literature DB >> 29321260

Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep.

Anne-Marie Pobloth1, Sara Checa1, Hajar Razi1,2, Ansgar Petersen1,3, James C Weaver4, Katharina Schmidt-Bleek1, Markus Windolf5, Andras Á Tatai6, Claudia P Roth1, Klaus-Dieter Schaser6,7, Georg N Duda8,3, Philipp Schwabe6.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) titanium-mesh scaffolds offer many advantages over autologous bone grafting for the regeneration of challenging large segmental bone defects. Our study supports the hypothesis that endogenous bone defect regeneration can be promoted by mechanobiologically optimized Ti-mesh scaffolds. Using finite element techniques, two mechanically distinct Ti-mesh scaffolds were designed in a honeycomb-like configuration to minimize stress shielding while ensuring resistance against mechanical failure. Scaffold stiffness was altered through small changes in the strut diameter only. Honeycombs were aligned to form three differently oriented channels (axial, perpendicular, and tilted) to guide the bone regeneration process. The soft scaffold (0.84 GPa stiffness) and a 3.5-fold stiffer scaffold (2.88 GPa) were tested in a critical size bone defect model in vivo in sheep. To verify that local scaffold stiffness could enhance healing, defects were stabilized with either a common locking compression plate that allowed dynamic loading of the 4-cm defect or a rigid custom-made plate that mechanically shielded the defect. Lower stress shielding led to earlier defect bridging, increased endochondral bone formation, and advanced bony regeneration of the critical size defect. This study demonstrates that mechanobiological optimization of 3D additive manufactured Ti-mesh scaffolds can enhance bone regeneration in a translational large animal study.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29321260     DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam8828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  44 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Scale Surface Treatments of Titanium Implants for Rapid Osseointegration: A Review.

Authors:  Qingge Wang; Peng Zhou; Shifeng Liu; Shokouh Attarilar; Robin Lok-Wang Ma; Yinsheng Zhong; Liqiang Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 2.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Siamak Saifzadeh; Flavia Medeiros Savi; Constantin E Dlaska; Arne Berner; Jan Henkel; Johannes C Reichert; Martin Wullschleger; Jiongyu Ren; Amaia Cipitria; Jacqui A McGovern; Roland Steck; Michael Wagels; Maria Ann Woodruff; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Scaffolds and coatings for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Helena Filipa Pereira; Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz; Filipe Samuel Silva; Rui Luís Reis; Joaquim Miguel Oliveira
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  The effect of surface topography and porosity on the tensile fatigue of 3D printed Ti-6Al-4V fabricated by selective laser melting.

Authors:  Cambre N Kelly; Nathan T Evans; Cameron W Irvin; Savita C Chapman; Ken Gall; David L Safranski
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 6.  Clinical and Research Approaches to Treat Non-union Fracture.

Authors:  Claudia Schlundt; Christian H Bucher; Serafeim Tsitsilonis; Hanna Schell; Georg N Duda; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Wireless sensor enables longitudinal monitoring of regenerative niche mechanics during rehabilitation that enhance bone repair.

Authors:  Brett S Klosterhoff; Jarred Kaiser; Bradley D Nelson; Salil S Karipott; Marissa A Ruehle; Scott J Hollister; Jeffrey A Weiss; Keat Ghee Ong; Nick J Willett; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The Design and In Vivo Testing of a Locally Stiffness-Matched Porous Scaffold.

Authors:  Shaaz Ghouse; Natalie Reznikov; Oliver R Boughton; Sarat Babu; K C Geoffrey Ng; Gordon Blunn; Justin P Cobb; Molly M Stevens; Jonathan R T Jeffers
Journal:  Appl Mater Today       Date:  2019-03-14

10.  Internal Fixation Construct and Defect Size Affect Healing of a Translational Porcine Diaphyseal Tibial Segmental Bone Defect.

Authors:  Todd O McKinley; Roman M Natoli; James P Fischer; Jeffrey D Rytlewski; David C Scofield; Rashad Usmani; Alexander Kuzma; Kaitlyn S Griffin; Emily Jewell; Paul Childress; Karl D Shively; Tien-Min Gabriel Chu; Jeffrey O Anglen; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.