Literature DB >> 32060491

A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

David S Sparks1,2,3, Siamak Saifzadeh1,4, Flavia Medeiros Savi1,5, Constantin E Dlaska1,6, Arne Berner1,7, Jan Henkel1, Johannes C Reichert8,9, Martin Wullschleger6,10, Jiongyu Ren1, Amaia Cipitria11, Jacqui A McGovern1, Roland Steck4, Michael Wagels2,3,12, Maria Ann Woodruff5,13, Michael A Schuetz1,6, Dietmar W Hutmacher14,15.   

Abstract

Critical-size bone defects, which require large-volume tissue reconstruction, remain a clinical challenge. Bone engineering has the potential to provide new treatment concepts, yet clinical translation requires anatomically and physiologically relevant preclinical models. The ovine critical-size long-bone defect model has been validated in numerous studies as a preclinical tool for evaluating both conventional and novel bone-engineering concepts. With sufficient training and experience in large-animal studies, it is a technically feasible procedure with a high level of reproducibility when appropriate preoperative and postoperative management protocols are followed. The model can be established by following a procedure that includes the following stages: (i) preoperative planning and preparation, (ii) the surgical approach, (iii) postoperative management, and (iv) postmortem analysis. Using this model, full results for peer-reviewed publication can be attained within 2 years. In this protocol, we comprehensively describe how to establish proficiency using the preclinical model for the evaluation of a range of bone defect reconstruction options.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32060491     DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0271-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  102 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of long bone defects and non-unions: from research to clinical practice.

Authors:  Arne Berner; Johannes C Reichert; Michael B Müller; Johannes Zellner; Christian Pfeifer; Thomas Dienstknecht; Michael Nerlich; Scott Sommerville; Ian C Dickinson; Michael A Schütz; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 5.249

2.  History of lower limb reconstruction after trauma.

Authors:  Michael Wagels; Dan Rowe; Shireen Senewiratne; David R Theile
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Bone reconstruction: A history of vascularized bone transfer.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Michael Wagels; G Ian Taylor
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 4.  Vascularised bone transfer: History, blood supply and contemporary problems.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Daniel B Saleh; Warren M Rozen; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Michael A Schuetz; Michael Wagels
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Advances and future directions for management of trauma patients with musculoskeletal injuries.

Authors:  Zsolt J Balogh; Marie K Reumann; Russell L Gruen; Philipp Mayer-Kuckuk; Michael A Schuetz; Ian A Harris; Belinda J Gabbe; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Polycaprolactone scaffold and reduced rhBMP-7 dose for the regeneration of critical-sized defects in sheep tibiae.

Authors:  Amaia Cipitria; Johannes C Reichert; Devakar R Epari; Siamak Saifzadeh; Arne Berner; Hanna Schell; Manav Mehta; Michael A Schuetz; Georg N Duda; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Soft tissue reconstruction after compound tibial fracture: 235 cases over 12 years.

Authors:  Michael Wagels; Dan Rowe; Shireen Senewiratne; Tavis Read; David R Theile
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Siamak Saifzadeh; Martin E Wullschleger; Devakara R Epari; Michael A Schütz; Georg N Duda; Hanna Schell; Martijn van Griensven; Heinz Redl; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Decreasing incidence of tibial shaft fractures between 1998 and 2004: information based on 10,627 Swedish inpatients.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Weiss; Scott M Montgomery; Anna Ehlin; Zewar Al Dabbagh; André Stark; Karl-Ake Jansson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 10.  Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions - A 21st Century Perspective.

Authors:  Jan Henkel; Maria A Woodruff; Devakara R Epari; Roland Steck; Vaida Glatt; Ian C Dickinson; Peter F M Choong; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 13.567

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A clinically relevant model of focal embolic cerebral ischemia by thrombus and thrombolysis in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Di Wu; Jian Chen; Longfei Wu; Hangil Lee; Jingfei Shi; Mo Zhang; Yanhui Ma; Xiaoduo He; Zixin Zhu; Feng Yan; Chuanjie Wu; Yunxia Duan; Yongjuan Fu; Sijie Li; Xinglong Zhi; Xuxiang Zhang; Shengli Li; Yuchuan Ding; Xunming Ji
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 2.  Pre-Clinical Evaluation of Biological Bone Substitute Materials for Application in Highly Loaded Skeletal Sites.

Authors:  Sónia de Lacerda Schickert; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; John A Jansen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-06-09

3.  Convergence of scaffold-guided bone regeneration and RIA bone grafting for the treatment of a critical-sized bone defect of the femoral shaft.

Authors:  Philipp Kobbe; Markus Laubach; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Hatem Alabdulrahman; Richard M Sellei; Frank Hildebrand
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.175

4.  Biocompatibility and degradation comparisons of four biodegradable copolymeric osteosynthesis systems used in maxillofacial surgery: A goat model with four years follow-up.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B van Bakelen; Léon Driessen; Pieter Buma; Jeroen Kuipers; Dirk W Grijpma; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-01-19

5.  Favorable osteogenic activity of iron doped in silicocarnotite bioceramic: In vitro and in vivo Studies.

Authors:  Jingwei Zhang; Fanyan Deng; Xiaoliang Liu; Yuwei Ge; Yiming Zeng; Zanjing Zhai; Congqin Ning; Huiwu Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Novel Techniques and Future Perspective for Investigating Critical-Size Bone Defects.

Authors:  Elijah Ejun Huang; Ning Zhang; Huaishuang Shen; Xueping Li; Masahiro Maruyama; Takeshi Utsunomiya; Qi Gao; Roberto A Guzman; Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-11

7.  3D-printed Sr2ZnSi2O7 scaffold facilitates vascularized bone regeneration through macrophage immunomodulation.

Authors:  Hao Pan; Li Deng; Lingwei Huang; Qi Zhang; Jing Yu; Yueyue Huang; Lei Chen; Jiang Chang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-16

8.  Establishment and Evaluation of a Rat Model of Medial Malleolar Fracture with Vascular Injury.

Authors:  Jinglai Sun; Qifeng Li; Shuo Wang; Guangpu Wang; Jing Zhao; Huanming Li; Chong Liu; Yifan Shi; Zhigang Li; Hui Yu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Identification of ultrasound imaging markers to quantify long bone regeneration in a segmental tibial defect sheep model in vivo.

Authors:  Songyuan Tang; Peer Shajudeen; Ennio Tasciotti; Raffaella Righetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.