Literature DB >> 29321205

Advantages of a distant cellulase catalytic base.

Tucker Burgin1, Jerry Ståhlberg2, Heather B Mayes3.   

Abstract

The inverting glycoside hydrolase Trichoderma reesei (Hypocrea jecorina) Cel6A is a promising candidate for protein engineering for more economical production of biofuels. Until recently, its catalytic mechanism had been uncertain: The best candidate residue to serve as a catalytic base, Asp-175, is farther from the glycosidic cleavage site than in other glycoside hydrolase enzymes. Recent unbiased transition path sampling simulations revealed the hydrolytic mechanism for this more distant base, employing a water wire; however, it is not clear why the enzyme employs a more distant catalytic base, a highly conserved feature among homologs across different kingdoms. In this work, we describe molecular dynamics simulations designed to uncover how a base with a longer side chain, as in a D175E mutant, affects procession and active site alignment in the Michaelis complex. We show that the hydrogen bond network is tuned to the shorter aspartate side chain, and that a longer glutamate side chain inhibits procession as well as being less likely to adopt a catalytically productive conformation. Furthermore, we draw comparisons between the active site in Trichoderma reesei Cel6A and another inverting, processive cellulase to deduce the contribution of the water wire to the overall enzyme function, revealing that the more distant catalytic base enhances product release. Our results can inform efforts in the study and design of enzymes by demonstrating how counterintuitive sacrifices in chemical reactivity can have worthwhile benefits for other steps in the catalytic cycle.
© 2018 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trichoderma reesei; bioenergy; bioengineering; biotechnology; cellobiohydrolase; cellulase; enzyme mechanism; glycoside hydrolase; molecular dynamics; protein engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29321205      PMCID: PMC5880141          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.001186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  35 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Analysis of the statistical error in umbrella sampling simulations by umbrella integration.

Authors:  Johannes Kästner; Walter Thiel
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 3.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Three-dimensional structure of cellobiohydrolase II from Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  J Rouvinen; T Bergfors; T Teeri; J K Knowles; T A Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-07-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Expanding the enzyme universe: accessing non-natural reactions by mechanism-guided directed evolution.

Authors:  Hans Renata; Z Jane Wang; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Computational investigation of the pH dependence of loop flexibility and catalytic function in glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Michael F Crowley; Michael E Himmel; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The structure of a bacterial cellobiohydrolase: the catalytic core of the Thermobifida fusca family GH6 cellobiohydrolase Cel6B.

Authors:  Mats Sandgren; Miao Wu; Saeid Karkehabadi; Colin Mitchinson; Bradley R Kelemen; Edmundo A Larenas; Jerry Ståhlberg; Henrik Hansson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

9.  The active site of cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Trichoderma reesei: the roles of aspartic acids D221 and D175.

Authors:  Anu Koivula; Laura Ruohonen; Gerd Wohlfahrt; Tapani Reinikainen; Tuula T Teeri; Kathleen Piens; Marc Claeyssens; Martin Weber; Andrea Vasella; Dieter Becker; Michael L Sinnott; Jin-Yu Zou; Gerard J Kleywegt; Michael Szardenings; Jerry Ståhlberg; T Alwyn Jones
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-08-28       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Structure of the catalytic core module of the Chaetomium thermophilum family GH6 cellobiohydrolase Cel6A.

Authors:  Andrew J Thompson; Tia Heu; Tarana Shaghasi; Romil Benyamino; Aubrey Jones; Esben P Friis; Keith S Wilson; Gideon J Davies
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2012-07-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Fungal cellulases: protein engineering and post-translational modifications.

Authors:  Ruiqin Zhang; Chenghao Cao; Jiahua Bi; Yanjun Li
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Domain architecture divergence leads to functional divergence in binding and catalytic domains of bacterial and fungal cellobiohydrolases.

Authors:  Akihiko Nakamura; Daiki Ishiwata; Akasit Visootsat; Taku Uchiyama; Kenji Mizutani; Satoshi Kaneko; Takeshi Murata; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Ryota Iino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.