Literature DB >> 23220193

The structure of a bacterial cellobiohydrolase: the catalytic core of the Thermobifida fusca family GH6 cellobiohydrolase Cel6B.

Mats Sandgren1, Miao Wu, Saeid Karkehabadi, Colin Mitchinson, Bradley R Kelemen, Edmundo A Larenas, Jerry Ståhlberg, Henrik Hansson.   

Abstract

Cellulases, glycoside hydrolases that catalyze the degradation of cellulose, are classified as either endoglucanases or cellobiohydrolases (CBHs) based on their architecture and mode of action on the cellulose. CBHs bind the cellulose chain in a more or less closed tunnel and cleave off cellobiose units processively from one end of the cellulosic polymer, while endoglucanases have their active sites in a more or less open cleft and show a higher tendency to cut bonds internally in the polymer. The CBH Cel6A (also called CBH2) from the ascomycete Hypocrea jecorina has a much shorter substrate-binding tunnel and seems less processive than the CBH Cel7A (CBH1), from the same fungus. Here, we present the X-ray crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the CBH Cel6B, also called E3, from the soil bacterium Thermobifida fusca, both in its apo form and co-crystallized with cellobiose. The enzyme structure reveals that the Cel6B enzyme has a much longer substrate-binding site than its fungal GH6 counterparts. The tunnel is comparable in length to that of GH7 CBHs. In the ligand structure with cellobiose, the tunnel exit is completely closed by a 13-residue loop not present in fungal GH6 enzymes. The loop needs to be displaced to allow cellobiose product release for a processive action by the enzyme. When ligand is absent, seven of these residues are not visible in the electron density and the tunnel exit is open.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23220193     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  10 in total

1.  Advantages of a distant cellulase catalytic base.

Authors:  Tucker Burgin; Jerry Ståhlberg; Heather B Mayes
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Characterization and homology modelling of a novel multi-modular and multi-functional Paenibacillus mucilaginosus glycoside hydrolase.

Authors:  Ntsoaki Leticia Mosina; Wolf-Dieter Schubert; Don A Cowan
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Loop motions important to product expulsion in the Thermobifida fusca glycoside hydrolase family 6 cellobiohydrolase from structural and computational studies.

Authors:  Miao Wu; Lintao Bu; Thu V Vuong; David B Wilson; Michael F Crowley; Mats Sandgren; Jerry Ståhlberg; Gregg T Beckham; Henrik Hansson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Impact of Module-X2 and Carbohydrate Binding Module-3 on the catalytic activity of associated glycoside hydrolases towards plant biomass.

Authors:  Nandita Pasari; Nidhi Adlakha; Mayank Gupta; Zeenat Bashir; Girish H Rajacharya; Garima Verma; Manoj Munde; Rakesh Bhatnagar; Syed Shams Yazdani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Discovery and characterization of a thermostable two-domain GH6 endoglucanase from a compost metagenome.

Authors:  Marianne S Jensen; Lasse Fredriksen; Alasdair K MacKenzie; Phillip B Pope; Ingar Leiros; Piotr Chylenski; Adele K Williamson; Tony Christopeit; Heidi Østby; Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad; Vincent G H Eijsink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Who's on base? Revealing the catalytic mechanism of inverting family 6 glycoside hydrolases.

Authors:  Heather B Mayes; Brandon C Knott; Michael F Crowley; Linda J Broadbelt; Jerry Ståhlberg; Gregg T Beckham
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Metagenomic mining and structure-function studies of a hyper-thermostable cellobiohydrolase from hot spring sediment.

Authors:  Migiwa Takeda; Seiki Baba; Jiro Okuma; Yoshitsugu Hirose; Asuka Nishimura; Masaki Takata; Kohei Oda; Daisuke Shibata; Takashi Kumasaka; Yasuhiro Kondo
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-03-22

8.  An ultrasensitive nanofiber-based assay for enzymatic hydrolysis and deep-sea microbial degradation of cellulose.

Authors:  Mikiko Tsudome; Mikako Tachioka; Masayuki Miyazaki; Kohsuke Uchimura; Miwako Tsuda; Yoshihiro Takaki; Shigeru Deguchi
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-07-30

9.  Ligand-binding specificity and promiscuity of the main lignocellulolytic enzyme families as revealed by active-site architecture analysis.

Authors:  Li Tian; Shijia Liu; Shuai Wang; Lushan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Domain architecture divergence leads to functional divergence in binding and catalytic domains of bacterial and fungal cellobiohydrolases.

Authors:  Akihiko Nakamura; Daiki Ishiwata; Akasit Visootsat; Taku Uchiyama; Kenji Mizutani; Satoshi Kaneko; Takeshi Murata; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Ryota Iino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.