| Literature DB >> 29318464 |
Yoshihiro Morino1, Daisuke Terashita2, Hiromasa Otake2, Tatsuo Kikuchi3, Tetsuya Fusazaki4, Nehiro Kuriyama5, Takahide Suzuki6, Yoshiaki Ito7, Kiyoshi Hibi8, Hiroyuki Tanaka9, Shozo Ishihara10, Toru Kataoka11, Takashi Morita12, Yoritaka Otsuka13, Takatoshi Hayashi14, Kengo Tanabe15, Toshiro Shinke2.
Abstract
The use of cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis compared with bare metal stents, and a substantial difference is apparent in the initial 2 weeks. However, vascular behavior during this early period remains unclear. This was a prospective study (MECHANISM-AMI-2W) to investigate early vascular responses in STEMI patients immediately after CoCr-EES implantation and at 2-week follow-up using frequency domain-optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT). The study enrolled 52 patients (age 63.7 ± 11.7 years, male 85.0%), of whom 44 patients were available for complete serial FD-OCT analyses. Both % uncovered struts and % malapposed struts were improved at 2-week follow-up (63 ± 20 vs. 21 ± 14%, p < 0.0001 and 7.3 ± 9.0 vs. 4.7 ± 5.9%, p = 0.005, respectively). Thrombus was decreased, with significant changes in longitudinal length to stent (28.8 ± 27.7 vs. 18.1 ± 20.2%, p = 0.0001) and maximal area (0.93 ± 0.84 vs. 0.65 ± 0.63 mm2, p = 0.034). As a result, the average lumen area was significantly larger at 2 weeks (6.49 ± 1.82 vs. 6.71 ± 1.89 mm2, p = 0.048, respectively). The number of dissection flaps was lower (0.86 ± 1.11 vs. 0.52 ± 0.90%, p = 0.024). In conclusion, this study showed early vascular responses to CoCr-EES for STEMI lesions-including a significant reduction of thrombus-that resulted in lumen enlargement, earlier progression of strut coverage, and improvements in strut apposition and dissection. The combination of these factors may therefore be responsible for the safety of CoCr-EES within the initial 2 weeks.Entities:
Keywords: Drug-eluting stent; Myocardial infarction; Optical coherence tomography; Thrombus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29318464 PMCID: PMC6329740 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-017-0507-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Interv Ther ISSN: 1868-4297
Fig. 1Representative quantitative parameters of in-stent findings, including thrombus (a), prolapse (b), malapposition (c), and dissection (d). Corresponding parameters (area, height/depth/flap length, longitudinal length) were measured for each thrombus or segment
Baseline clinical, lesion, procedural characteristics (n = 52)
| Age, years | 63.7 ± 11.7 |
| Male gender, | 44 (85.0) |
| Height, cm | 165.6 ± 9.3 |
| Body weight, kg | 64.3 ± 12.7 |
| Diabetes, | 22 (42.3) |
| Hypertension, | 32 (61.5) |
| Dyslipidemia, | 42 (80.8) |
| eGFR < 60, | 11 (21.1) |
| Smoking, | 26 (50.0) |
| Family history, | 9 (17.3) |
| Culprit vessel, | |
| LAD, RCA, LCx | 21 (40.4), 21 (40.4), 10 (19.2) |
| Angiographic reference diameter, mm | 2.78 ± 0.56 |
| Diameter stenosis, % | 100 (1–100) |
| TIMI-flow, | |
| 3, 2, 1, 0 | 1 (1.9), 11 (21.2), 6 (11.5), 34 (65.4) |
| Bifurcated lesions, | 23 (44.2) |
| AHA/ACC lesion type, | |
| A, B1, B2, C | 0 (0), 2 (3.8), 39 (75.0), 11 (21.2) |
| Door to balloon time, min | 64 (29–276) |
| Used stent number, | 1.15 ± 0.36 |
| Used stent diameter, mm | 3.02 ± 0.39 |
| Final maximum inflation pressure, atm | 15.0 ± 3.4 |
| Aspiration catheter uses, | 42 (80.8) |
| Peak CPK, mg/dl | 1351 (109–7526) |
| Peak CPK-MB, mg/dl | 105 (4–445) |
| Hemoglobin, mg/dl | 14.3 ± 1.8 |
| Chronic antiplatelet use prior to STEMI, | |
| Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel | 2 (3.8), 0 (0%), 0 (0) |
| Dual antiplatelet therapy at 2 weeks, | 52 (100) |
| Thienopyridine use, | |
| Clopidogrel, prasugrel | 51 (98.1), 1 (1.9) |
| Anticoagulation drugs use | 3 (6.5) |
eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, LAD left anterior descending artery, RCA right coronary artery, LCx left circumflex artery
Quantitative and quantitative coronary angiography
| Post-procedure | 2-week follow-up | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TIMI grade, | |||
| 3, 2, 1, 0 | 46 (88.5), 5 (8.6), 1 (2.0), 0 (0) | 41 (80.4), 10 (19.6), 0 (0), 0 (0) | 0.238 |
| In-lesion | |||
| Reference diameter, mm | 2.88 ± 0.53 | 2.78 ± 0.52 | 0.037 |
| MLD, mm | 2.23 ± 0.55 | 2.14 ± 0.59 | 0.129 |
| % Diameter stenosis, % | 22.7 ± 11.1 | 23.8 ± 11.8 | 0.552 |
| In-stent | |||
| Reference diameter, mm | 2.93 ± 0.49 | 2.89 ± 0.48 | 0.095 |
| MLD, mm | 2.53 ± 0.46 | 2.49 ± 0.42 | 0.461 |
| % DS, % | 13.8 ± 9.8 | 13.5 ± 9.4 | 0.860 |
| Stent length, mm | 20.1 ± 6.6 | 20.0 ± 6.6 | 0.582 |
| Proximal margin | |||
| MLD, mm | 2.75 ± 0.58 | 2.68 ± 0.54 | 0.202 |
| % DS, % | 11.8 ± 8.6 | 11.8 ± 8.6 | 0.867 |
| Distal margin | |||
| MLD, mm | 2.26 ± 0.59 | 2.17 ± 0.58 | 0.118 |
| % DS, % | 16.1 ± 11.5 | 17.9 ± 13.3 | 0.244 |
MLD minimal lumen diameter, % DS % diameter stenosis
Fig. 2Schematic flow chart of case eligibility. Post-procedural images from 45 lesions, 2-week follow-up images from 49 lesions, and serial images from 44 cases were analyzed
Overall FD-OCT assessments at post PCI and at 2 weeks follow-up
| Variables | Post-procedure ( | 2 weeks follow-up ( |
|---|---|---|
| Visual assessments | ||
| No. of cross-section, | 24.4 ± 7.4 | 24.7 ± 7.4 |
| No. of struts, | 219 ± 76 | 230 ± 75 |
| No of malapposed struts, | 15.9 ± 21.7 | 11.1 ± 15.1 |
| % Malapposed struts, % | 7.2 ± 9.0 | 4.7 ± 5.7 |
| No. of uncovered struts, | 143 ± 68 | 49 ± 38 |
| % uncovered struts, % | 64.0 ± 19.7 | 20.7 ± 13.7 |
| Quantitative measurements | ||
| Average stent length, mm | 23.2 ± 7.5 | 23.2 ± 7.4 |
| Average stent area, mm2 | 6.65 ± 1.82 | 6.74 ± 1.92 |
| Minimum stent area, mm2 | 5.36 ± 1.47 | 5.41 ± 1.62 |
| Maximum stent area, mm2 | 8.07 ± 2.57 | 8.12 ± 2.67 |
| Average stent diameter, mm | 2.87 ± 0.40 | 2.89 ± 0.42 |
| Average lumen area, mm2 | 6.50 ± 1.80 | 6.72 ± 1.90 |
| Minimum lumen area, mm2 | 4.97 ± 1.54 | 5.21 ± 1.58 |
| Maximum lumen area, mm2 | 8.40 ± 2.58 | 8.53 ± 2.67 |
| Average lumen diameter, mm | 2.83 ± 0.40 | 2.88 ± 0.41 |
| Average intra-stent tissue area, mm2 | 0.33 ± 0.41 | 0.21 ± 0.18 |
| Average intra-stent tissue thickness, mm | 0.031 ± 0.038 | 0.038 ± 0.015 |
| Minimum intra-stent tissue thickness, mm | 0 | 0 |
| Maximum intra-stent tissue thickness, mm | 0.39 ± 0.29 | 0.28 ± 0.16 |
PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, intra-stent tissue thickness; distance from strut to lumen surface
In-depth serial quantitative FD-OCT analysis of the stented culprit lesions (n = 44)
| Variables | Post-procedure | 2-week follow-up | |
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of cross-section, | 24.5 ± 7.5 | 24.6 ± 7.5 | 0.41 |
| No. of struts, | 220 ± 76 | 227 ± 75 | 0.03 |
| % Malapposed struts, % | 7.3 ± 9.0 | 4.7 ± 5.9 | 0.005 |
| % Uncovered struts, % | 63 ± 20 | 21 ± 14 | < 0.0001 |
| Average stent length, mm | 23.3 ± 7.5 | 23.2 ± 7.5 | 0.68 |
| Average lumen area, mm2 | 6.49 ± 1.82 | 6.71 ± 1.89 | 0.048 |
| Minimum lumen area, mm2 | 4.96 ± 1.56 | 5.27 ± 1.56 | 0.040 |
| Average intra-stent tissue area, mm2 | 0.34 ± 0.42 | 0.21 ± 0.19 | 0.016 |
| % intra-stent tissue area, % | 4.9 ± 6.0 | 3.1 ± 2.5 | 0.024 |
| Average intra-stent tissue thickness, mm | 0.031 ± 0.038 | 0.038 ± 0.016 | 0.18 |
| Maximum intra-stent tissue thickness, mm | 0.39 ± 030 | 0.28 ± 0.17 | 0.015 |
| Serial comparison of in-stent findings | |||
| Thrombus | |||
| Presence of thrombus, | 43 (98) | 37 (84) | 0.029 |
| No. of thrombus mass (≥ 250 μm), | 2.9 ± 1.7 | 1.7 ± 1.6 | 0.0001 |
| Total longitudinal length, mm | 6.73 ± 5.60 | 4.32 ± 5.02 | 0.0001 |
| % Longitudinal length to stent, % | 28.8 ± 22.7 | 18.1 ± 20.2 | 0.0001 |
| Maximum area, mm2 | 0.93 ± 0.87 | 0.65 ± 0.63 | 0.034 |
| Average maximum height of each mass, mm | 0.49 ± 0.21 | 0.37 ± 0.27 | 0.0036 |
| Prolapse | |||
| No. of prolapse (≥ 250 μm), | 0.95 ± 1.0 | 0.52 ± 0.82 | 0.0116 |
| Total longitudinal length, mm | 1.36 ± 1.65 | 0.80 ± 1.59 | 0.0558 |
| % Longitudinal length to stent, % | 6.0 ± 7.1 | 3.9 ± 7.5 | 0.10 |
| Maximum area, mm2 | 0.22 ± 0.25 | 0.11 ± 0.22 | 0.0245 |
| Average maximum height of each prolapse, mm | 0.20 ± 0.19 | 0.13 ± 0.22 | 0.1193 |
| Malapposition | |||
| No. of malapposed segment, | 2.3 ± 2.1 | 2.3 ± 2.0 | 0.85 |
| Total longitudinal length, mm | 3.94 ± 4.42 | 4.30 ± 5.48 | 0.50 |
| % Longitudinal length to stent, % | 16.5 ± 15.6 | 17.4 ± 18.8 | 0.629 |
| Maximum area, mm2 | 0.72 ± 0.72 | 0.73 ± 0.73 | 0.870 |
| Average maximum area of each segment, mm2 | 0.56 ± 0.60 | 0.52 ± 0.46 | 0.565 |
| Average maximum depth of each segment, mm | 0.25 ± 0.13 | 0.28 ± 0.16 | 0.277 |
| Dissection | |||
| No. of dissections (flap ≥ 200 μm), | 0.86 ± 1.11 | 0.52 ± 0.90 | 0.024 |
| Total longitudinal length, mm | 0.73 ± 1.12 | 0.58 ± 1.17 | 0.310 |
| % Longitudinal length to stent, % | 3.0 ± 7.0 | 2.3 ± 4.4 | 0.368 |
| Transverse length of flap arm, mm | 0.22 ± 0.24 | 0.16 ± 0.25 | 0.251 |
| Proximal edge dissectiona, | 3.0 (6.8) | 0 (0) | 0.121 |
| Distal edge dissectionb, | 3.0 (7.3) | 3.0 (6.2) | 0.63 |
No. number
a44 for post-procedure vs. 48 for 2-week follow-up
b41 for post-procedure vs. 48 for 2-week follow-up
Fig. 3Serial FD-OCT images at post-procedure (a) and 2-week follow-up (b). In-stent thrombus was significantly decreased at 2-week follow-up in the representative cross-sections
Fig. 4Individual plots of serial changes in % uncovered struts and % malapposed struts between post-procedure and 2-week follow-up
Fig. 5Individual plots of serial changes in minimal lumen area and thrombus (maximum area and % length) within stent between post-procedure and 2-week follow-up