Literature DB >> 27597270

Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial.

Yoshinobu Onuma1, Yohei Sotomi, Hiroki Shiomi, Yukio Ozaki, Atsuro Namiki, Satoshi Yasuda, Takafumi Ueno, Kenji Ando, Jungo Furuya, Keiichi Igarashi, Ken Kozuma, Kengo Tanabe, Hajime Kusano, Richard Rapoza, Jeffrey J Popma, Gregg W Stone, Charles Simonton, Patrick W Serruys, Takeshi Kimura.   

Abstract

AIMS: We sought to investigate two-year clinical and serial optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes after implantation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) or a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES). METHODS AND
RESULTS: In the ABSORB Japan trial, 400 patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to BVS (N=266) or CoCr-EES (N=134). A pre-specified OCT subgroup (N=125, OCT-1 group) underwent angio-graphy and OCT post procedure and at two years. Overall, the two-year TLF rates were 7.3% and 3.8% in the BVS and CoCr-EES arms (p=0.18), respectively. Very late scaffold thrombosis (VLST) beyond one year was observed in 1.6% (four cases: all in non-OCT-1 subgroups) of the BVS arm, while there was no VLST in the CoCr-EES arm. In three cases, OCT at the time of or shortly after VLST demonstrated strut discontinuities, malapposition and/or uncovered struts. However, the vessel healing by two-year OCT was nearly complete in both BVS and CoCr-EES arms with almost fully covered struts, and minimal malapposition. The flow area by two-year OCT was smaller in the BVS arm than in the CoCr-EES arm, mainly due to tissue growth inside the device. However, there were no differences between the BVS and CoCr-EES with regard to the quality of homogenous tissues growing inside the devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of TLF was numerically higher in the BVS arm than in the CoCr-EES arm, although this difference was not statistically significant. VLST was observed only in the BVS arm at a rate of 1.6% between one and two years. Further studies are mandatory to investigate the risk of BVS relative to metallic stents for VLST, and the underlying mechanisms of BVS VLST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27597270     DOI: 10.4244/EIJY16M09_01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  24 in total

1.  Long-term clinical results of biodegradable vascular scaffold ABSORB BVS™ using the PSP-technique in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jarosław Hiczkiewicz; Sylwia Iwańczyk; Aleksander Araszkiewicz; Magdalena Łanocha; Dariusz Hiczkiewicz; Stefan Grajek; Maciej Lesiak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for complex coronary anatomies: "Icarus' flight" for interventional cardiologists?

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Adnan Kastrati; Massimiliano Fusaro
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

3.  Effect of strut distribution on neointimal coverage of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds: an optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Takao Sato; John Jose; Abdelhakim Allai; Mohamed El-Mawardy; Ralph Tölg; Gert Richardt; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Single or dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.

Authors:  Yosuke Miyazaki; Pannipa Suwannasom; Yohei Sotomi; Mohammad Abdelghani; Karthik Tummala; Yuki Katagiri; Taku Asano; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Yaping Zeng; Rafael Cavalcante; Carlos Collet; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  Lights and shadows of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy in "real life" clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Marino Scherillo; Plinio Cirillo; Dario Formigli; Giulio Bonzani; Paolo Calabrò; Paolo Capogrosso; Pio Caso; Giovanni Esposito; Rosario Farina; Paolo Golino; Tonino Lanzillo; Franco Mascia; Ciro Mauro; Federico Piscione; Girolamo Sibilio; Bernardino Tuccillo; Bruno Villari; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Adverse events with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine percutaneous coronary interventions: "coup de théâtre" or unfinished play?

Authors:  Salvatore Cassese; Oliver Husser; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Bioresorbable scaffolds versus metallic stents in routine PCI: the plot thickens.

Authors:  Athanasios Katsikis; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Optical coherence tomography guidance during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.

Authors:  Gioel Gabrio Secco; Monica Verdoia; Gianfranco Pistis; Giuseppe De Luca; Matteo Vercellino; Andrea Audo; Rosario Parisi; Maurizio Reale; Giorgio Ballestrero; Paolo Nicola Marino; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Current concepts on coronary revascularization using BRS in patients with diabetes and small vessels disease.

Authors:  Giulia Masiero; Marco Mojoli; Daisuke Ueshima; Giuseppe Tarantini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Are acute coronary syndromes an ideal scenario for bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation?

Authors:  Elisabetta Moscarella; Alfonso Ielasi; Maria Carmen De Angelis; Fortunato Scotto di Uccio; Enrico Cerrato; Roberta De Rosa; Gianluca Campo; Attilio Varricchio
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.