Literature DB >> 16088887

The effect of changes in tumor size on breast carcinoma survival in the U.S.: 1975-1999.

Elena B Elkin1, Clifford Hudis, Colin B Begg, Deborah Schrag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporal comparisons of case survival are commonly used to assess improvement in cancer treatment at the population level. However, such comparisons may be confounded by secular trends in disease prognosis, even within conventional stage categories. The objective of the current study was to characterize within-stage migration of tumor size in breast carcinoma, and to estimate the effect of this shift on reported breast carcinoma survival.
METHODS: Population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry data were used to evaluate secular trends in tumor size at the time of diagnosis and relative survival among localized and regional invasive breast carcinoma patients diagnosed between 1975-1999. Outcomes were stage-specific tumor size distribution, 5-year relative survival, relative survival standardized to the tumor size distribution of the cohort diagnosed between 1975-1979, and the percentage of improvement in relative survival attributable to shifts in tumor size distribution.
RESULTS: Within each stage category, the proportion of smaller tumors increased significantly over time. Comparing patients diagnosed between 1995-1999 with those diagnosed between 1975-1979, within-stage migration of tumor size accounted for 61% and 28%, respectively, of the relative survival increases noted in localized and regional breast carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The tumor size distribution of incident breast carcinomas in SEER has shifted toward smaller tumors. A substantial fraction of the improvement in breast carcinoma survival noted since 1975 may be attributable to within-stage migration of tumor size. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16088887     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

1.  Association of Screening and Treatment With Breast Cancer Mortality by Molecular Subtype in US Women, 2000-2012.

Authors:  Sylvia K Plevritis; Diego Munoz; Allison W Kurian; Natasha K Stout; Oguzhan Alagoz; Aimee M Near; Sandra J Lee; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xuelin Huang; Clyde B Schechter; Brian L Sprague; Juhee Song; Harry J de Koning; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Ronald Gangnon; Young Chandler; Yisheng Li; Cong Xu; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Hui Huang; Donald A Berry; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Multifocal neoplastic precursor lesions associated with lobular atrophy of the pancreas in patients having a strong family history of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Kieran Brune; Tadayoshi Abe; Marcia Canto; Lauren O'Malley; Alison P Klein; Anirban Maitra; N Volkan Adsay; Elliot K Fishman; John L Cameron; Charles J Yeo; Scott E Kern; Michael Goggins; Ralph H Hruban
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  More misinformation on breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

Review 4.  The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Neutrosophic segmentation of breast lesions for dedicated breast computed tomography.

Authors:  Juhun Lee; Robert M Nishikawa; Ingrid Reiser; John M Boone
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  Mammography-Seeking Practices of Central Illinois Amish Women.

Authors:  Sarah Dee Geiger; Diana Grigsby-Toussaint
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-04

7.  Recurrence and Survival After Resection of Small Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-associated Carcinomas (≤20-mm Invasive Component): A Multi-institutional Analysis.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; Wei Jiang; Olca Basturk; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Zhi Ven Fong; Wei Phin Tan; Harish Lavu; Charles M Vollmer; Emma E Furth; Dana Haviland; David S Klimstra; William R Jarnagin; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Peter J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Physical activity barriers and resources among black women with a history of breast and endometrial cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natasha R Burse; Nishat Bhuiyan; Scherezade K Mama; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.442

9.  Breast Cancer Patients' Preferences for Adjuvant Radiotherapy Post Lumpectomy: Whole Breast Irradiation vs. Partial Breast Irradiation-Single Institutional Study.

Authors:  Katija Bonin; Merrylee McGuffin; Roseanna Presutti; Tamara Harth; Aruz Mesci; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Edward Chow; Lisa Di Prospero; Danny Vesprini; Eileen Rakovitch; Justin Lee; Lawrence Paszat; Mary Doherty; Hany Soliman; Ida Ackerman; Xingshan Cao; Alex Kiss; Ewa Szumacher
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Sub-100nm gold nanomatryoshkas improve photo-thermal therapy efficacy in large and highly aggressive triple negative breast tumors.

Authors:  Ciceron Ayala-Orozco; Cordula Urban; Sandra Bishnoi; Alexander Urban; Heather Charron; Tamika Mitchell; Martin Shea; Sarmistha Nanda; Rachel Schiff; Naomi Halas; Amit Joshi
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.