Lauren Collins1, Allison M Glasser1, Haneen Abudayyeh1, Jennifer L Pearson2,3, Andrea C Villanti2,4. 1. The Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC. 2. Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. 3. School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV. 4. Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the lack of regulation on marketing of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in the United States and the increasing exchange of e-cigarette-related information online, it is critical to understand how e-cigarette companies market e-cigarettes and how the public engages with e-cigarette information. Methods: Results are from a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature on e-cigarettes via a PubMed search through June 1, 2017. Search terms included: "e-cigarette*" or "electronic cigarette" or "electronic cigarettes" or "electronic nicotine delivery" or "vape" or "vaping." Experimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, qualitative studies, and mixed methods studies providing empirical findings on e-cigarette marketing and communication (ie, nonmarketing communication in the public) were included. Results: One hundred twenty-four publications on e-cigarette marketing and communication were identified. They covered topics including e-cigarette advertisement claims/promotions and exposure/receptivity, the effect of e-cigarette advertisements on e-cigarette and cigarette use, public engagement with e-cigarette information, and the public's portrayal of e-cigarettes. Studies show increases in e-cigarette marketing expenditures and online engagement through social media over time, that e-cigarettes are often framed as an alternative to combustible cigarettes, and that e-cigarette advertisement exposure may be associated with e-cigarette trial in adolescents and young adults. Discussion: Few studies examine the effects of e-cigarette marketing on perceptions and e-cigarette and cigarette use. Evidence suggests that exposure to e-cigarette advertisements affects perceptions and trial of e-cigarettes, but there is no evidence that exposure affects cigarette use. No studies examined how exposure to e-cigarette communication, particularly misleading or inaccurate information, impacts e-cigarette, and tobacco use behaviors. Implications: The present article provides a comprehensive review of e-cigarette marketing and how the public engages with e-cigarette information. Studies suggest an association between exposure to e-cigarette marketing and lower harm perceptions of e-cigarettes, intention to use e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette trial, highlighting the need to for advertising regulations that support public health goals. Findings from this review also present the methodological limitations of the existing research (primarily due to cross-sectional and correlational analyses) and underscore the need for timely, rigorous research to provide an accurate understanding of e-cigarette marketing and communication and its impact on e-cigarette and tobacco product use.
Introduction: Given the lack of regulation on marketing of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) in the United States and the increasing exchange of e-cigarette-related information online, it is critical to understand how e-cigarette companies market e-cigarettes and how the public engages with e-cigarette information. Methods: Results are from a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature on e-cigarettes via a PubMed search through June 1, 2017. Search terms included: "e-cigarette*" or "electronic cigarette" or "electronic cigarettes" or "electronic nicotine delivery" or "vape" or "vaping." Experimental studies, quasi-experimental studies, observational studies, qualitative studies, and mixed methods studies providing empirical findings on e-cigarette marketing and communication (ie, nonmarketing communication in the public) were included. Results: One hundred twenty-four publications on e-cigarette marketing and communication were identified. They covered topics including e-cigarette advertisement claims/promotions and exposure/receptivity, the effect of e-cigarette advertisements on e-cigarette and cigarette use, public engagement with e-cigarette information, and the public's portrayal of e-cigarettes. Studies show increases in e-cigarette marketing expenditures and online engagement through social media over time, that e-cigarettes are often framed as an alternative to combustible cigarettes, and that e-cigarette advertisement exposure may be associated with e-cigarette trial in adolescents and young adults. Discussion: Few studies examine the effects of e-cigarette marketing on perceptions and e-cigarette and cigarette use. Evidence suggests that exposure to e-cigarette advertisements affects perceptions and trial of e-cigarettes, but there is no evidence that exposure affects cigarette use. No studies examined how exposure to e-cigarette communication, particularly misleading or inaccurate information, impacts e-cigarette, and tobacco use behaviors. Implications: The present article provides a comprehensive review of e-cigarette marketing and how the public engages with e-cigarette information. Studies suggest an association between exposure to e-cigarette marketing and lower harm perceptions of e-cigarettes, intention to use e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette trial, highlighting the need to for advertising regulations that support public health goals. Findings from this review also present the methodological limitations of the existing research (primarily due to cross-sectional and correlational analyses) and underscore the need for timely, rigorous research to provide an accurate understanding of e-cigarette marketing and communication and its impact on e-cigarette and tobacco product use.
Authors: John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Jon-Patrick Allem; Eric C Leas; Mark Dredze; Rebecca S Williams Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: John P Pierce; James D Sargent; Martha M White; Nicolette Borek; David B Portnoy; Victoria R Green; Annette R Kaufman; Cassandra A Stanton; Maansi Bansal-Travers; David R Strong; Jennifer L Pearson; Blair N Coleman; Eric Leas; Madison L Noble; Dennis R Trinidad; Meghan B Moran; Charles Carusi; Andrew Hyland; Karen Messer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jennifer Cornacchione; Kimberly D Wiseman; Randall Teal; Kathryn E Moracco; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Gera E Nagelhout; Suzanne M Heijndijk; K Michael Cummings; Marc C Willemsen; Bas van den Putte; Bryan W Heckman; Karin Hummel; Hein de Vries; David Hammond; Ron Borland Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2015-12-21
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Caroline O Cobb; Lyubov Teplitskaya; Ollie Ganz; Lauren Katz; Shyanika W Rose; Shari Feirman; Andrea C Villanti Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Cassandra A Stanton; Eva Sharma; Kathryn C Edwards; Michael J Halenar; Kristie A Taylor; Karin A Kasza; Hannah Day; Gabriella Anic; Lisa D Gardner; Hoda T Hammad; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Jean Limpert; Nicolette Borek; Heather L Kimmel; Wilson M Compton; Andrew Hyland Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Claire Adams Spears; Dina M Jones; Scott R Weaver; Bo Yang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen Journal: Addiction Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah Kahnert; Pete Driezen; James Balmford; Christina N Kyriakos; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Paraskevi A Katsaounou; Antigona C Trofor; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Witold A Zatoński; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas; Ute Mons Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Laura R Stroud; George D Papandonatos; Katelyn Borba; Tessa Kehoe; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Alexandra Loukas; Ellen M Paddock; Xiaoyin Li; Melissa B Harrell; Keryn E Pasch; Cheryl L Perry Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: E Wadsworth; A McNeill; L Li; D Hammond; J F Thrasher; H-H Yong; K M Cummings; G T Fong; S C Hitchman Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Paula Lozano; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Inti Barrientos-Gutíerrez; Luz Myriam Reynales Shigematsu; James F Thrasher Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2019-01-04