Literature DB >> 30496009

Trends in Trust in the Sources of Health Information on E-Cigarettes Among US Adults, 2015-2017.

Daniel Owusu1, Scott R Weaver1, Bo Yang1, David L Ashley1, Lucy Popova1.   

Abstract

Objectives. To evaluate recent levels and trends in trust in sources of health information on e-cigarettes in the United States.Methods. We obtained data from nationally representative samples of adults in 2015 (n = 5389), 2016 (n = 5273), and 2017 (n = 5389) that reported trust in 13 sources of health information on e-cigarettes in the United States. We used weighted linear regression models to examine temporal trends in trust levels.Results. Doctors, health organizations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), health experts and scientists, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and family and friends were trusted, whereas news media, e-cigarette users, social media, vape shop employees, and e-cigarette and cigarette companies were distrusted. From 2015 to 2017, trust significantly increased for CDC, FDA, health experts and scientists, and news media (Ps < .01). Trust also increased for NIH between 2016 and 2017 (P < .01).Conclusions. US adults trust public health sources and distrust entities with commercial interest in e-cigarettes. This suggests that evidence-based messaging and information on health effects of e-cigarettes from public health professionals can effectively counter e-cigarette promotion and improve public understanding about e-cigarettes.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30496009      PMCID: PMC6301383          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  5 in total

1.  Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada.

Authors:  P Slovic; M Layman; N Kraus; J Flynn; J Chalmers; G Gesell
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  'Not harmless' messages without comparisons disserve consumers, potential consumers, and public health approaches to tobacco/nicotine products.

Authors:  Lynn T Kozlowski; David T Sweanor
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 3.  E-Cigarette Marketing and Communication: How E-Cigarette Companies Market E-Cigarettes and the Public Engages with E-cigarette Information.

Authors:  Lauren Collins; Allison M Glasser; Haneen Abudayyeh; Jennifer L Pearson; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  The Debate About Electronic Cigarettes: Harm Minimization or the Precautionary Principle.

Authors:  Lawrence W Green; Jonathan E Fielding; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  A critique of a World Health Organization-commissioned report and associated paper on electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Ann McNeill; Jean-Francois Etter; Konstantinos Farsalinos; Peter Hajek; Jacques le Houezec; Hayden McRobbie
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 6.526

  5 in total
  7 in total

1.  'The lesser devil you don't know': a qualitative study of smokers' responses to messages communicating comparative risk of electronic and combusted cigarettes.

Authors:  Daniel Owusu; Rachel Lawley; Bo Yang; Katherine Henderson; Brittaney Bethea; Christopher LaRose; Sam Stallworth; Lucy Popova
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Rural-urban differences e-cigarette ever use, the perception of harm, and e-cigarette information seeking behaviors among U.S. adults in a nationally representative study.

Authors:  Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Marvin E Langston; Lindsay Fuzzell; Saira Khan; Justin X Moore; Yunan Han
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Perception of the relative harm of electronic cigarettes compared to cigarettes amongst US adults from 2013 to 2016: analysis of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study data.

Authors:  Layla Malt; Thomas Verron; Xavier Cahours; Mengran Guo; Sarah Weaver; Tanvir Walele; Grant O'Connell
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2020-09-18

Review 4.  Characterising trusted spokespeople in noncommunicable disease prevention: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Anastassia Demeshko; Lisa Buckley; Kylie Morphett; Jean Adams; Roger Meany; Katherine Cullerton
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  US adult smokers' perceived relative risk on ENDS and its effects on their transitions between cigarettes and ENDS.

Authors:  Sooyong Kim; Saul Shiffman; Mark A Sembower
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Assessing comprehension and perceptions of modified-risk information for snus among adult current cigarette smokers, former tobacco users, and never tobacco users.

Authors:  Janine L Pillitteri; Saul Shiffman; Mark A Sembower; Michael R Polster; Geoffrey M Curtin
Journal:  Addict Behav Rep       Date:  2020-01-24

7.  Content Analysis of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Publications in Core Clinical Journals from 2012 to 2018.

Authors:  Michael Briganti; Olivia A Wackowski; Cristine D Delnevo; Leanne Brown; Shirin E Hastings; Binu Singh; Michael B Steinberg
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.