John W Ayers1, Benjamin M Althouse2, Jon-Patrick Allem3, Eric C Leas4, Mark Dredze5, Rebecca S Williams6. 1. Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, California. Electronic address: ayers.john.w@gmail.com. 2. The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico; Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico. 3. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California. 4. University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California. 5. Johns Hopkins Human Language Technology Center of Excellence, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Public perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) remain poorly understood because surveys are too costly to regularly implement and, when implemented, there are long delays between data collection and dissemination. Search query surveillance has bridged some of these gaps. Herein, ENDS' popularity in the U.S. is reassessed using Google searches. METHODS: ENDS searches originating in the U.S. from January 2009 through January 2015 were disaggregated by terms focused on e-cigarette (e.g., e-cig) versus vaping (e.g., vapers); their geolocation (e.g., state); the aggregate tobacco control measures corresponding to their geolocation (e.g., clean indoor air laws); and by terms that indicated the searcher's potential interest (e.g., buy e-cigs likely indicates shopping)-all analyzed in 2015. RESULTS: ENDS searches are rapidly increasing in the U.S., with 8,498,000 searches during 2014 alone. Increasingly, searches are shifting from e-cigarette- to vaping-focused terms, especially in coastal states and states where anti-smoking norms are stronger. For example, nationally, e-cigarette searches declined 9% (95% CI=1%, 16%) during 2014 compared with 2013, whereas vaping searches increased 136% (95% CI=97%, 186%), even surpassing e-cigarette searches. Additionally, the percentage of ENDS searches related to shopping (e.g., vape shop) nearly doubled in 2014, whereas searches related to health concerns (e.g., vaping risks) or cessation (e.g., quit smoking with e-cigs) were rare and declined in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: ENDS popularity is rapidly growing and evolving. These findings could inform survey questionnaire development for follow-up investigation and immediately guide policy debates about how the public perceives the health risks or cessation benefits of ENDS.
INTRODUCTION: Public perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) remain poorly understood because surveys are too costly to regularly implement and, when implemented, there are long delays between data collection and dissemination. Search query surveillance has bridged some of these gaps. Herein, ENDS' popularity in the U.S. is reassessed using Google searches. METHODS: ENDS searches originating in the U.S. from January 2009 through January 2015 were disaggregated by terms focused on e-cigarette (e.g., e-cig) versus vaping (e.g., vapers); their geolocation (e.g., state); the aggregate tobacco control measures corresponding to their geolocation (e.g., clean indoor air laws); and by terms that indicated the searcher's potential interest (e.g., buy e-cigs likely indicates shopping)-all analyzed in 2015. RESULTS: ENDS searches are rapidly increasing in the U.S., with 8,498,000 searches during 2014 alone. Increasingly, searches are shifting from e-cigarette- to vaping-focused terms, especially in coastal states and states where anti-smoking norms are stronger. For example, nationally, e-cigarette searches declined 9% (95% CI=1%, 16%) during 2014 compared with 2013, whereas vaping searches increased 136% (95% CI=97%, 186%), even surpassing e-cigarette searches. Additionally, the percentage of ENDS searches related to shopping (e.g., vape shop) nearly doubled in 2014, whereas searches related to health concerns (e.g., vaping risks) or cessation (e.g., quit smoking with e-cigs) were rare and declined in 2014. CONCLUSIONS: ENDS popularity is rapidly growing and evolving. These findings could inform survey questionnaire development for follow-up investigation and immediately guide policy debates about how the public perceives the health risks or cessation benefits of ENDS.
Authors: Aruni Bhatnagar; Laurie P Whitsel; Kurt M Ribisl; Chris Bullen; Frank Chaloupka; Mariann R Piano; Rose Marie Robertson; Timothy McAuley; David Goff; Neal Benowitz Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Scott R Weaver; Hyoshin Kim; Allison M Glasser; Erin L Sutfin; Jessica Barrington-Trimis; Thomas J Payne; Megan Saddleson; Alexandra Loukas Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Sara C Hitchman; Leonie S Brose; Linda Bauld; Allison M Glasser; Andrea C Villanti; Ann McNeill; David B Abrams; Joanna E Cohen Journal: Tob Control Date: 2017-06-17 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Kelly C Young-Wolff; Daniella Klebaner; Bruce Folck; Lisa Carter-Harris; Ramzi G Salloum; Judith J Prochaska; Renee Fogelberg; Andy S L Tan Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Lauren Collins; Allison M Glasser; Haneen Abudayyeh; Jennifer L Pearson; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Jennifer L Pearson; Michael S Amato; Xi Wang; Kang Zhao; Sarah Cha; Amy M Cohn; George D Papandonatos; Amanda L Graham Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 4.244