BACKGROUND: This study examined how risk perceptions and social norms around e-cigarettes are associated with susceptibility (i.e., openness to using the product in the next 12 months) of e-cigarettes and smoking among adolescents. METHODS: We analyzed data from a 2016 representative survey of 8,718 middle school students in Mexico. The study sample was restricted to students who had tried neither e-cigarettes nor cigarettes, ( N = 4471). Students reported on the risks of e-cigarettes compared with those of cigarettes, and product-specific norms were measured by assessing current use by family members, at least one close friend, and, for e-cigarettes, by perceived societal acceptability of use (i.e., acceptability among people in general). Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) were estimated using generalized estimating equation models that regressed e-cigarette societal acceptability on study variables. Adjusted generalized estimating equation models also regressed susceptibility for each product on study variables. RESULTS: Susceptibility to both e-cigarettes and smoking was higher among students who reported that their family and friends used only cigarettes or both products when compared with students whose family and friends did not use either of these products. Friend use of e-cigarettes was associated with e-cigarette susceptibility (APR = 1.33) but not smoking susceptibility. Students who perceived that e-cigarettes were less risky than smoking were more susceptible to e-cigarette use (APR = 1.45). The association between e-cigarette susceptibility and friend or family use was not mediated by societal acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette use among family and peers appears associated with susceptibility to use e-cigarettes in a way that is similar to the patterns found for cigarettes. However, the influences appear somewhat specific to the type of product that network members use.
BACKGROUND: This study examined how risk perceptions and social norms around e-cigarettes are associated with susceptibility (i.e., openness to using the product in the next 12 months) of e-cigarettes and smoking among adolescents. METHODS: We analyzed data from a 2016 representative survey of 8,718 middle school students in Mexico. The study sample was restricted to students who had tried neither e-cigarettes nor cigarettes, ( N = 4471). Students reported on the risks of e-cigarettes compared with those of cigarettes, and product-specific norms were measured by assessing current use by family members, at least one close friend, and, for e-cigarettes, by perceived societal acceptability of use (i.e., acceptability among people in general). Adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) were estimated using generalized estimating equation models that regressed e-cigarette societal acceptability on study variables. Adjusted generalized estimating equation models also regressed susceptibility for each product on study variables. RESULTS: Susceptibility to both e-cigarettes and smoking was higher among students who reported that their family and friends used only cigarettes or both products when compared with students whose family and friends did not use either of these products. Friend use of e-cigarettes was associated with e-cigarette susceptibility (APR = 1.33) but not smoking susceptibility. Students who perceived that e-cigarettes were less risky than smoking were more susceptible to e-cigarette use (APR = 1.45). The association between e-cigarette susceptibility and friend or family use was not mediated by societal acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette use among family and peers appears associated with susceptibility to use e-cigarettes in a way that is similar to the patterns found for cigarettes. However, the influences appear somewhat specific to the type of product that network members use.
Entities:
Keywords:
e-cigarette; risk peception; social norms; susceptibility to tobacco products
Authors: Aruni Bhatnagar; Laurie P Whitsel; Kurt M Ribisl; Chris Bullen; Frank Chaloupka; Mariann R Piano; Rose Marie Robertson; Timothy McAuley; David Goff; Neal Benowitz Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Samir Soneji; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Thomas A Wills; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Laura A Gibson; JaeWon Yang; Brian A Primack; Judy A Andrews; Richard A Miech; Tory R Spindle; Danielle M Dick; Thomas Eissenberg; Robert C Hornik; Rui Dang; James D Sargent Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; James F Thrasher; Belén Sáenz de Miera Juárez; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Amira Osman; Mohammad Siahpush; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Tob Control Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Thomas A Wills; James D Sargent; Frederick X Gibbons; Ian Pagano; Rebecca Schweitzer Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Karen Hughes; Mark A Bellis; Katherine A Hardcastle; Philip McHale; Andrew Bennett; Robin Ireland; Kate Pike Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Erika N Abad-Vivero; James F Thrasher; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Inti Barrientos-Gutíerrez; Christy Kollath-Cattano; Raúl Mejía; James D Sargent Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Máirtín S McDermott; Katherine A East; Sara C Hitchman; Ann McNeill; Yannis Tountas; Tibor Demjén; Esteve Fernández; Ute Mons; Antigona C Trofor; Aleksandra Herbeć; Kinga Janik-Koncewicz; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Alayna P Tackett; Brittney Keller-Hamilton; Emily T Hébert; Caitlin E Smith; Samantha W Wallace; Elise M Stevens; Amanda L Johnson; Theodore L Wagener Journal: Am J Health Promot Date: 2020-11-10
Authors: Nan Jiang; Charles M Cleland; Man Ping Wang; Antonio Kwong; Vienna Lai; Tai Hing Lam Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Katherine A East; Sara C Hitchman; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: E Santano-Mogena; C Franco-Antonio; S Chimento-Díaz; S Rico-Martín; S Cordovilla-Guardia Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christopher Tate; Rajnish Kumar; Jennifer M Murray; Sharon Sanchez-Franco; Olga L Sarmiento; Shannon C Montgomery; Huiyu Zhou; Abhijit Ramalingam; Erin Krupka; Erik Kimbrough; Frank Kee; Ruth F Hunter Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Lizeth Cruz-Jiménez; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Liliana Coutiño-Escamilla; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Edna Arillo-Santillán; James F Thrasher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390