Literature DB >> 29311308

DNA double-strand break response factors influence end-joining features of IgH class switch and general translocation junctions.

Rohit A Panchakshari1,2,3, Xuefei Zhang1,2,3, Vipul Kumar1,2,3, Zhou Du1,2,3, Pei-Chi Wei1,2,3, Jennifer Kao1,2,3, Junchao Dong1,2,3, Frederick W Alt4,2,3.   

Abstract

Ig heavy chain (IgH) class switch recombination (CSR) in B lymphocytes switches IgH constant regions to change antibody functions. CSR is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within a donor IgH switch (S) region and a downstream acceptor S region. CSR is completed by fusing donor and acceptor S region DSB ends by classical nonhomologous end-joining (C-NHEJ) and, in its absence, by alternative end-joining that is more biased to use longer junctional microhomologies (MHs). Deficiency for DSB response (DSBR) factors, including ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and 53BP1, variably impair CSR end-joining, with 53BP1 deficiency having the greatest impact. However, studies of potential impact of DSBR factor deficiencies on MH-mediated CSR end-joining have been technically limited. We now use a robust DSB joining assay to elucidate impacts of deficiencies for DSBR factors on CSR and chromosomal translocation junctions in primary mouse B cells and CH12F3 B-lymphoma cells. Compared with wild-type, CSR and c-myc to S region translocation junctions in the absence of 53BP1, and, to a lesser extent, other DSBR factors, have increased MH utilization; indeed, 53BP1-deficient MH profiles resemble those associated with C-NHEJ deficiency. However, translocation junctions between c-myc DSB and general DSBs genome-wide are not MH-biased in ATM-deficient versus wild-type CH12F3 cells and are less biased in 53BP1- and C-NHEJ-deficient cells than CSR junctions or c-myc to S region translocation junctions. We discuss potential roles of DSBR factors in suppressing increased MH-mediated DSB end-joining and features of S regions that may render their DSBs prone to MH-biased end-joining in the absence of DSBR factors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA repair; class switch recombination; microhomology-mediated end-joining; nonhomologous end-joining

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29311308      PMCID: PMC5789958          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719988115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

Review 1.  Mapping of switch recombination junctions, a tool for studying DNA repair pathways during immunoglobulin class switching.

Authors:  Janet Stavnezer; Andrea Björkman; Likun Du; Alberto Cagigi; Qiang Pan-Hammarström
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.543

2.  PAXX and XLF DNA repair factors are functionally redundant in joining DNA breaks in a G1-arrested progenitor B-cell line.

Authors:  Vipul Kumar; Frederick W Alt; Richard L Frock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Molecular Mechanisms of Somatic Hypermutation and Class Switch Recombination.

Authors:  S P Methot; J M Di Noia
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.543

4.  53BP1 regulates DNA resection and the choice between classical and alternative end joining during class switch recombination.

Authors:  Anne Bothmer; Davide F Robbiani; Niklas Feldhahn; Anna Gazumyan; Andre Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 14.307

Review 5.  DNA polymerase θ (POLQ), double-strand break repair, and cancer.

Authors:  Richard D Wood; Sylvie Doublié
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-14

6.  Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching.

Authors:  Michela Di Virgilio; Elsa Callen; Arito Yamane; Wenzhu Zhang; Mila Jankovic; Alexander D Gitlin; Niklas Feldhahn; Wolfgang Resch; Thiago Y Oliveira; Brian T Chait; André Nussenzweig; Rafael Casellas; Davide F Robbiani; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells.

Authors:  Roberto Chiarle; Yu Zhang; Richard L Frock; Susanna M Lewis; Benoit Molinie; Yu-Jui Ho; Darienne R Myers; Vivian W Choi; Mara Compagno; Daniel J Malkin; Donna Neuberg; Stefano Monti; Cosmas C Giallourakis; Monica Gostissa; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Mechanisms of programmed DNA lesions and genomic instability in the immune system.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Yu Zhang; Fei-Long Meng; Chunguang Guo; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Orientation-specific joining of AID-initiated DNA breaks promotes antibody class switching.

Authors:  Junchao Dong; Rohit A Panchakshari; Tingting Zhang; Yu Zhang; Jiazhi Hu; Sabrina A Volpi; Robin M Meyers; Yu-Jui Ho; Zhou Du; Davide F Robbiani; Feilong Meng; Monica Gostissa; Michel C Nussenzweig; John P Manis; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Detecting DNA double-stranded breaks in mammalian genomes by linear amplification-mediated high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing.

Authors:  Jiazhi Hu; Robin M Meyers; Junchao Dong; Rohit A Panchakshari; Frederick W Alt; Richard L Frock
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 13.491

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  DNA double-strand breaks as drivers of neural genomic change, function, and disease.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

2.  High-throughput sequencing reveals similar molecular signatures for class switch recombination junctions for the γ and α isotypes.

Authors:  Hussein Issaoui; Nour Ghazzaui; Alexis Saintamand; Yves Denizot; François Boyer
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 11.530

Review 3.  How cells ensure correct repair of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Joonyoung Her; Samuel F Bunting
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase is not implicated in the choice of the DNA repair pathway during B-cell class switch recombination.

Authors:  Nour Ghazzaui; Hussein Issaoui; Alexis Saintamand; Yves Denizot; François Boyer
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.530

5.  Noncoding RNA processing by DIS3 regulates chromosomal architecture and somatic hypermutation in B cells.

Authors:  Brice Laffleur; Junghyun Lim; Wanwei Zhang; Yiyun Chen; Evangelos Pefanis; Jonathan Bizarro; Carolina R Batista; Lijing Wu; Aris N Economides; Jiguang Wang; Uttiya Basu
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  V(D)J recombination, somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination of immunoglobulins: mechanism and regulation.

Authors:  Xiying Chi; Yue Li; Xiaoyan Qiu
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 7.397

Review 7.  The recent advances in non-homologous end-joining through the lens of lymphocyte development.

Authors:  Xiaobin S Wang; Brian J Lee; Shan Zha
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-06-25

8.  Kinase-dependent structural role of DNA-PKcs during immunoglobulin class switch recombination.

Authors:  Jennifer L Crowe; Zhengping Shao; Xiaobin S Wang; Pei-Chi Wei; Wenxia Jiang; Brian J Lee; Verna M Estes; Frederick W Alt; Shan Zha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  CtIP-mediated DNA resection is dispensable for IgH class switch recombination by alternative end-joining.

Authors:  Xiaobin S Wang; Junfei Zhao; Foon Wu-Baer; Zhengping Shao; Brian J Lee; Olivia M Cupo; Raul Rabadan; Jean Gautier; Richard Baer; Shan Zha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  SAMHD1-mediated dNTP degradation is required for efficient DNA repair during antibody class switch recombination.

Authors:  Afzal Husain; Jianliang Xu; Hodaka Fujii; Mikiyo Nakata; Maki Kobayashi; Ji-Yang Wang; Jan Rehwinkel; Tasuku Honjo; Nasim A Begum
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.