Literature DB >> 26308889

Orientation-specific joining of AID-initiated DNA breaks promotes antibody class switching.

Junchao Dong1, Rohit A Panchakshari1, Tingting Zhang1, Yu Zhang1, Jiazhi Hu1, Sabrina A Volpi2, Robin M Meyers1, Yu-Jui Ho1, Zhou Du1, Davide F Robbiani3, Feilong Meng1, Monica Gostissa1, Michel C Nussenzweig3, John P Manis2, Frederick W Alt1.   

Abstract

During B-cell development, RAG endonuclease cleaves immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) V, D, and J gene segments and orchestrates their fusion as deletional events that assemble a V(D)J exon in the same transcriptional orientation as adjacent Cμ constant region exons. In mice, six additional sets of constant region exons (CHs) lie 100-200 kilobases downstream in the same transcriptional orientation as V(D)J and Cμ exons. Long repetitive switch (S) regions precede Cμ and downstream CHs. In mature B cells, class switch recombination (CSR) generates different antibody classes by replacing Cμ with a downstream CH (ref. 2). Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates CSR by promoting deamination lesions within Sμ and a downstream acceptor S region; these lesions are converted into DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by general DNA repair factors. Productive CSR must occur in a deletional orientation by joining the upstream end of an Sμ DSB to the downstream end of an acceptor S-region DSB. However, the relative frequency of deletional to inversional CSR junctions has not been measured. Thus, whether orientation-specific joining is a programmed mechanistic feature of CSR as it is for V(D)J recombination and, if so, how this is achieved is unknown. To address this question, we adapt high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing into a highly sensitive DSB end-joining assay and apply it to endogenous AID-initiated S-region DSBs in mouse B cells. We show that CSR is programmed to occur in a productive deletional orientation and does so via an unprecedented mechanism that involves in cis Igh organizational features in combination with frequent S-region DSBs initiated by AID. We further implicate ATM-dependent DSB-response factors in enforcing this mechanism and provide an explanation of why CSR is so reliant on the 53BP1 DSB-response factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26308889      PMCID: PMC4592165          DOI: 10.1038/nature14970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  40 in total

1.  Antibody class switching mediated by yeast endonuclease-generated DNA breaks.

Authors:  Ali A Zarrin; Catherine Del Vecchio; Eva Tseng; Megan Gleason; Payam Zarin; Ming Tian; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  RPA accumulation during class switch recombination represents 5'-3' DNA-end resection during the S-G2/M phase of the cell cycle.

Authors:  Arito Yamane; Davide F Robbiani; Wolfgang Resch; Anne Bothmer; Hirotaka Nakahashi; Thiago Oliveira; Philipp C Rommel; Eric J Brown; Andre Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig; Rafael Casellas
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Enhanced intra-switch region recombination during immunoglobulin class switch recombination in 53BP1-/- B cells.

Authors:  Bernardo Reina-San-Martin; Junjie Chen; André Nussenzweig; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus.

Authors:  Stephanie Panier; Simon J Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 5.  53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair.

Authors:  Michal Zimmermann; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 20.808

6.  Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems.

Authors:  Le Cong; F Ann Ran; David Cox; Shuailiang Lin; Robert Barretto; Naomi Habib; Patrick D Hsu; Xuebing Wu; Wenyan Jiang; Luciano A Marraffini; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The AID-induced DNA damage response in chromatin.

Authors:  Jeremy A Daniel; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching.

Authors:  Michela Di Virgilio; Elsa Callen; Arito Yamane; Wenzhu Zhang; Mila Jankovic; Alexander D Gitlin; Niklas Feldhahn; Wolfgang Resch; Thiago Y Oliveira; Brian T Chait; André Nussenzweig; Rafael Casellas; Davide F Robbiani; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  IgH class switching exploits a general property of two DNA breaks to be joined in cis over long chromosomal distances.

Authors:  Monica Gostissa; Bjoern Schwer; Amelia Chang; Junchao Dong; Robin M Meyers; Gregory T Marecki; Vivian W Choi; Roberto Chiarle; Ali A Zarrin; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Mechanisms of programmed DNA lesions and genomic instability in the immune system.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Yu Zhang; Fei-Long Meng; Chunguang Guo; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  55 in total

1.  Transcription-associated processes cause DNA double-strand breaks and translocations in neural stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Bjoern Schwer; Pei-Chi Wei; Amelia N Chang; Jennifer Kao; Zhou Du; Robin M Meyers; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  DNA double-strand break response factors influence end-joining features of IgH class switch and general translocation junctions.

Authors:  Rohit A Panchakshari; Xuefei Zhang; Vipul Kumar; Zhou Du; Pei-Chi Wei; Jennifer Kao; Junchao Dong; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  53BP1 Contributes to Igh Locus Chromatin Topology during Class Switch Recombination.

Authors:  Scott Feldman; Robert Wuerffel; Ikbel Achour; Lili Wang; Phillip B Carpenter; Amy L Kenter
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  An insulator that regulates chromatin extrusion and class switch recombination.

Authors:  Kefei Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mechanisms and consequences of diversity-generating immune strategies.

Authors:  Edze R Westra; David Sünderhauf; Mariann Landsberger; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 53.106

6.  TIRR regulates 53BP1 by masking its histone methyl-lysine binding function.

Authors:  Pascal Drané; Marie-Eve Brault; Gaofeng Cui; Khyati Meghani; Shweta Chaubey; Alexandre Detappe; Nishita Parnandi; Yizhou He; Xiao-Feng Zheng; Maria Victoria Botuyan; Alkmini Kalousi; William T Yewdell; Christian Münch; J Wade Harper; Jayanta Chaudhuri; Evi Soutoglou; Georges Mer; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  DNA double-strand breaks as drivers of neural genomic change, function, and disease.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

8.  Highly sensitive and unbiased approach for elucidating antibody repertoires.

Authors:  Sherry G Lin; Zhaoqing Ba; Zhou Du; Yu Zhang; Jiazhi Hu; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  BRCT-domain protein BRIT1 influences class switch recombination.

Authors:  Wei-Feng Yen; Ashutosh Chaudhry; Bharat Vaidyanathan; William T Yewdell; Joseph N Pucella; Rahul Sharma; Yulong Liang; Kaiyi Li; Alexander Y Rudensky; Jayanta Chaudhuri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Kinase-dependent structural role of DNA-PKcs during immunoglobulin class switch recombination.

Authors:  Jennifer L Crowe; Zhengping Shao; Xiaobin S Wang; Pei-Chi Wei; Wenxia Jiang; Brian J Lee; Verna M Estes; Frederick W Alt; Shan Zha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.