Literature DB >> 27693450

Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 ng/ml and Above.

Andrew Vickers1, Emily A Vertosick2, Daniel D Sjoberg2, Monique J Roobol3, Freddie Hamdy4, David Neal4, Anders Bjartell5, Jonas Hugosson6, Jenny L Donovan7, Arnauld Villers8, Stephen Zappala9, Hans Lilja2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The 4-kallikrein panel, commercially available as the 4Kscore™, is a reflex test for prostate cancer early detection that has been extensively validated in multiple international cohorts. It has been suggested that use of such reflex tests be limited to those with prostate specific antigen less than 10 ng/ml and negative digital rectal examination. We aimed to determine the value of the panel in men outside this "diagnostic gray zone."
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis using data from prior studies on the 4-kallikrein panel. We calculated the properties of the panel for predicting high grade (Gleason 7+) cancer in a subgroup of men with either positive digital rectal examination or prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml.
RESULTS: A total 2,891 men from 8 cohorts were included. An important proportion of patients, including 32% in the United States validation study, had prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml or a positive digital rectal examination. For men with prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml the fixed-effects estimate for the discrimination of the kallikrein model was 0.84 vs 0.69 for the base model (difference 0.128, 95% CI 0.098-0.159). In the positive digital rectal examination group discrimination was 0.82 vs 0.72 (difference 0.092, 95% CI 0.069-0.115). Decision analysis showed a clinical net benefit for use of the panel in this subgroup with a reduction in biopsy rates of about 20% and only a small number of high grade cancers missed, or fewer than 3% of those not biopsied.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the kallikrein panel in men with a positive digital rectal examination or prostate specific antigen 10 to 25 ng/ml is justified.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digital rectal examination; early detection of cancer; kallikreins; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693450      PMCID: PMC5315584          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Impact of recent screening on predicting the outcome of prostate cancer biopsy in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Reducing unnecessary biopsy during prostate cancer screening using a four-kallikrein panel: an independent replication.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Angel Cronin; Monique Roobol; Caroline Savage; Mari Peltola; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Fritz Schröder; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.

Authors:  Moniek M Vedder; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Hans G Lilja; Andrew J Vickers; Geert J L H van Leenders; Ewout W Steyerberg; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  A panel of kallikrein markers can predict outcome of prostate biopsy following clinical work-up: an independent validation study from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening, France.

Authors:  Amine Benchikh; Caroline Savage; Angel Cronin; Gilles Salama; Arnauld Villers; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  A four-kallikrein panel for the prediction of repeat prostate biopsy: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer screening in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Authors:  A Gupta; M J Roobol; C J Savage; M Peltola; K Pettersson; P T Scardino; A J Vickers; F H Schröder; H Lilja
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Predicting high-grade cancer at ten-core prostate biopsy using four kallikrein markers measured in blood in the ProtecT study.

Authors:  Richard J Bryant; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Mary C Robinson; Rajeev Kumar; Luke Marsden; Michael Davis; Peter T Scardino; Jenny Donovan; David E Neal; Hans Lilja; Freddie C Hamdy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  A panel of kallikrein markers can reduce unnecessary biopsy for prostate cancer: data from the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Gunnar Aus; Carl-Gustav Pihl; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Peter T Scardino; Jonas Hugosson; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Strategy for detection of prostate cancer based on relation between prostate specific antigen at age 40-55 and long term risk of metastasis: case-control study.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; David Ulmert; Daniel D Sjoberg; Caroline J Bennette; Thomas Björk; Axel Gerdtsson; Jonas Manjer; Peter M Nilsson; Anders Dahlin; Anders Bjartell; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-04-15

10.  Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-25
View more
  8 in total

1.  Clinical performance of the 4Kscore Test to predict high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy: A meta-analysis of us and European clinical validation study results.

Authors:  Stephen M Zappala; Peter T Scardino; David Okrongly; Vincent Linder; Yan Dong
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

2.  Differentiating Molecular Risk Assessments for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin Press; Michael Schulster; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

3.  Value of Intact Prostate Specific Antigen and Human Kallikrein 2 in the 4 Kallikrein Predictive Model: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Anders Bjartell; Jonas Hugosson; Jenny L Donovan; Arnauld Villers; Stephen Zappala; Hans Lilja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan So; Phillipe Violette; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association recommendations on prostate cancer screening and early diagnosis Endorsement of the 2021 Cancer Care Ontario guidelines on prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ross J Mason; Karim Marzouk; Antonio Finelli; Fred Saad; Alan I So; Philippe D Violette; Rodney H Breau; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.052

6.  Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy and radical radiotherapy in PSA-detected clinically localised prostate cancer: the ProtecT three-arm RCT.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Julia Wade; Sian Noble; Kirsty Garfield; Grace Young; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Jane Blazeby; Richard Bryant; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Vincent Gnanapragasam; Owen Hughes; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Edgar Paez; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek Rosario; Edward Rowe; David Neal
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 7.  Detection and Prognosis of Prostate Cancer Using Blood-Based Biomarkers.

Authors:  Wei Jin; Xiang Fei; Xia Wang; Yan Song; Fangjie Chen
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.711

8.  Predicting Grade group 2 or higher cancer at prostate biopsy by 4Kscore in blood and uCaP microRNA model in urine.

Authors:  Jacob Fredsøe; Martin Rasmussen; Amy L Tin; Andrew J Vickers; Michael Borre; Karina D Sørensen; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.