Literature DB >> 29302116

Quantification of Carbon Dioxide Removal at Low Sweep Gas and Blood Flows.

Juan de Villiers Hugo1, Ajay S Sharma1, Usaama Ahmed1, Patrick W Weerwind1.   

Abstract

Advancement in oxygenator membrane technology has further expanded the boundaries in the clinical application of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R). Despite the advent of modern poly-4-methyl-1-pentene (PMP) membranes, limited information exists on the performance of these membranes at low sweep gas and blood flows. Moreover, physiological relationships for CO2 removal at these flows are less explored. Hence, CO2 removal was quantified in an in vitro setting using a PMP membrane oxygenator. ECCO2R was performed using a .8 m2 surface pediatric oxygenator in an in vitro setting with freshly drawn single-source porcine blood. In this setting, low blood flows of either 200 or 350 mL/min were generated, with sweep gas flow rates of 100, 200, and 400 mL/min, respectively. CO2 transfer ranged from 14.05 ± 4.35 mL/min/m2 to 18.76 ± 4.26 mL/min/m2 at a sweep gas to a blood flow ratio of .5:1 to 2:1 (p < .01). Decreasing this ratio i.e., increasing the blood flow (.5:1.75 and 2:1.75) resulted in a lower CO2 transfer of 10.00 ± 4.77 mL/min/m2 to 16.87 ± 5.09 mL/min/m2, which was still statistically significant (p < .01). Alternatively, decreasing the sweep gas to blood flow ratio, while maintaining a constant gas flow, did not show a significant increase in CO2 extraction (p > .05). At these test parameters, an increase in sweep gas improved the CO2 transfer, whereas an increase in blood flow resulted in a lower CO2 transfer. These results indicate that CO2 removal in low-flow ECCO2R is mainly sweep gas flow driven. Although these settings might not be applicable for clinical use, this study gives tangible information about the important factor involved in ECCO2R.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal; low blood flows; low sweep gas flow

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29302116      PMCID: PMC5737416     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  14 in total

Review 1.  Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: practical aspects of circuits, cannulae, and procedures.

Authors:  David Sidebotham; Sara Jane Allen; Alastair McGeorge; Nathan Ibbott; Timothy Willcox
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 2.628

2.  Low-Flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal Using the Hemolung Respiratory Dialysis System® to Facilitate Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  Bindu Akkanti; Keshava Rajagopal; Kirti P Patel; Sangeeta Aravind; Emmanuel Nunez-Centanu; Rahat Hussain; Farshad Raissi Shabari; Wayne L Hofstetter; Ara A Vaporciyan; Igor S Banjac; Biswajit Kar; Igor D Gregoric; Pranav Loyalka
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2017-06

3.  Respiratory dialysis for avoidance of intubation in acute exacerbation of COPD.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Mani; Werner Schmidt; Laura W Lund; Felix J F Herth
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

4.  The carbon dioxide membrane lung (CDML): a new concept.

Authors:  T Kolobow; L Gattinoni; T Tomlinson; D White; J Pierce; G Iapichino
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1977

5.  A standardized method for defining the overall gas transfer performance of artificial lungs.

Authors:  P M Galletti; P D Richardson; M T Snider; L I Friedman
Journal:  Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs       Date:  1972

Review 6.  Role and potentials of low-flow CO(2) removal system in mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Terragni; Giorgia Maiolo; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Control of breathing using an extracorporeal membrane lung.

Authors:  T Kolobow; L Gattinoni; T A Tomlinson; J E Pierce
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Validation of a model for flow-dependent carbon dioxide exchange in artificial lungs.

Authors:  M S Hout; B G Hattler; W J Federspiel
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 9.  Bench to bedside review: Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal, past present and future.

Authors:  Matthew E Cove; Graeme MacLaren; William J Federspiel; John A Kellum
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Lower tidal volume strategy (≈3 ml/kg) combined with extracorporeal CO2 removal versus 'conventional' protective ventilation (6 ml/kg) in severe ARDS: the prospective randomized Xtravent-study.

Authors:  Thomas Bein; Steffen Weber-Carstens; Anton Goldmann; Thomas Müller; Thomas Staudinger; Jörg Brederlau; Ralf Muellenbach; Rolf Dembinski; Bernhard M Graf; Marlene Wewalka; Alois Philipp; Klaus-Dieter Wernecke; Matthias Lubnow; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 17.440

View more
  7 in total

1.  Dual Carbon Dioxide Capture to Achieve Highly Efficient Ultra-Low Blood Flow Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal.

Authors:  Brian Y Chang; Steven P Keller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  A mock circulation loop to test extracorporeal CO2 elimination setups.

Authors:  Leonie S Schwärzel; Anna M Jungmann; Nicole Schmoll; Frederik Seiler; Ralf M Muellenbach; Joachim Schenk; Quoc Thai Dinh; Robert Bals; Philipp M Lepper; Albert J Omlor
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-09-11

3.  A Novel Mock Circuit to Test Full-Flow Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Stefan Caspari; Leonie S Schwärzel; Anna M Jungmann; Nicole Schmoll; Frederik Seiler; Ralf M Muellenbach; Marcin Krawczyk; Quoc Thai Dinh; Robert Bals; Philipp M Lepper; Albert J Omlor
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  The Physiology of the Apnea Test for Brain Death Determination in ECMO: Arguments for Blending Carbon Dioxide.

Authors:  William B Beam; Phillip D Scott; Eelco F M Wijdicks
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Physiological and Technical Considerations of Extracorporeal CO2 Removal.

Authors:  Christian Karagiannidis; Felix Hesselmann; Eddy Fan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  A Double Catheter Approach for Extracorporeal CO2 Removal Integrated Within a Continuous Renal Replacement Circuit.

Authors:  David De Bels; Charalampos Pierrakos; Herbert D Spapen; Patrick M Honore
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2018-12-31

7.  A mock circulation loop to test extracorporeal CO2 elimination setups.

Authors:  Leonie S Schwärzel; Anna M Jungmann; Nicole Schmoll; Frederik Seiler; Ralf M Muellenbach; Joachim Schenk; Quoc Thai Dinh; Robert Bals; Philipp M Lepper; Albert J Omlor
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-09-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.