Background: Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is a promising yet limited researched therapy for hypercapnic respiratory failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome and exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Herein, we describe a new mock circuit that enables experimental ECCO2R research without animal models. In a second step, we use this model to investigate three experimental scenarios of ECCO2R: (I) the influence of hemoglobin concentration on CO2 removal. (II) a potentially portable ECCO2R that uses air instead of oxygen, (III) a low-flow ECCO2R that achieves effective CO2 clearance by recirculation and acidification of the limited blood volume of a small dual lumen cannula (such as a dialysis catheter). Results: With the presented ECCO2R mock, CO2 removal rates comparable to previous studies were obtained. The mock works with either fresh porcine blood or diluted expired human packed red blood cells. However, fresh porcine blood was preferred because of better handling and availability. In the second step of this work, hemoglobin concentration was identified as an important factor for CO2 removal. In the second scenario, an air-driven ECCO2R setup showed only a slightly lower CO2 wash-out than the same setup with pure oxygen as sweep gas. In the last scenario, the low-flow ECCO2R, the blood flow at the test membrane lung was successfully raised with a recirculation channel without the need to increase cannula flow. Low recirculation ratios resulted in increased efficiency, while high recirculation ratios caused slightly reduced CO2 removal rates. Acidification of the CO2 depleted blood in the recirculation channel caused an increase in CO2 removal rate. Conclusions: We demonstrate a simple and cost effective, yet powerful, "in-vitro" ECCO2R model that can be used as an alternative to animal experiments for many research scenarios. Moreover, in our approach parameters such as hemoglobin level can be modified more easily than in animal models.
Background: Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is a promising yet limited researched therapy for hypercapnic respiratory failure in acute respiratory distress syndrome and exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Herein, we describe a new mock circuit that enables experimental ECCO2R research without animal models. In a second step, we use this model to investigate three experimental scenarios of ECCO2R: (I) the influence of hemoglobin concentration on CO2 removal. (II) a potentially portable ECCO2R that uses air instead of oxygen, (III) a low-flow ECCO2R that achieves effective CO2 clearance by recirculation and acidification of the limited blood volume of a small dual lumen cannula (such as a dialysis catheter). Results: With the presented ECCO2R mock, CO2 removal rates comparable to previous studies were obtained. The mock works with either fresh porcine blood or diluted expired human packed red blood cells. However, fresh porcine blood was preferred because of better handling and availability. In the second step of this work, hemoglobin concentration was identified as an important factor for CO2 removal. In the second scenario, an air-driven ECCO2R setup showed only a slightly lower CO2 wash-out than the same setup with pure oxygen as sweep gas. In the last scenario, the low-flow ECCO2R, the blood flow at the test membrane lung was successfully raised with a recirculation channel without the need to increase cannula flow. Low recirculation ratios resulted in increased efficiency, while high recirculation ratios caused slightly reduced CO2 removal rates. Acidification of the CO2 depleted blood in the recirculation channel caused an increase in CO2 removal rate. Conclusions: We demonstrate a simple and cost effective, yet powerful, "in-vitro" ECCO2R model that can be used as an alternative to animal experiments for many research scenarios. Moreover, in our approach parameters such as hemoglobin level can be modified more easily than in animal models.
Authors: Andrea Morelli; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Antonio Pesenti; V Marco Ranieri; Eddy Fan Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-28 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Frederik Seiler; Franziska C Trudzinski; Kai Hennemann; Tom Niermeyer; Christian Schmoll; Annegret Kamp; Robert Bals; Ralf M Muellenbach; Hendrik Haake; Philipp M Lepper Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Shalv P Madhani; Alexandra G May; Brian J Frankowski; Greg W Burgreen; William J Federspiel Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Alberto Zanella; Marco Giani; Sara Redaelli; Paolo Mangili; Vittorio Scaravilli; Valentina Ormas; Marco Costanzi; Mariangela Albertini; Giacomo Bellani; Nicolò Patroniti; Antonio Pesenti Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-11-11 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Alexandra G May; R Garrett Jeffries; Brian J Frankowski; Greg W Burgreen; William J Federspiel Journal: Intensive Care Med Exp Date: 2018-09-24