Literature DB >> 2929836

Tibiofemoral joint forces during isokinetic knee extension.

R Nisell1, M O Ericson, G Németh, J Ekholm.   

Abstract

Using a Cybex II, eight healthy male subjects performed isokinetic knee extensions at two different speeds (30 and 180 deg/sec) and two different positions of the resistance pad (proximal and distal). A sagittal plane, biomechanical model was used for calculating the magnitude of the tibiofemoral joint compressive and shear forces. The magnitude of isokinetic knee extending moments was found to be significantly lower with the resistance pad placed proximally on the leg instead of distally. The tibiofemoral compressive force was of the same magnitude as the patellar tendon force, with a maximum of 6300 N or close to 9 times body weight (BW). The tibiofemoral shear force changed direction from being negative (tibia tends to move posteriorly in relation to femur) to a positive magnitude of about 700 N or close to 1 BW, indicating that high forces arise in the ACL when the knee is extended more than 60 degrees. The anteriorly directed shear force was lowered considerably by locating the resistance pad to a proximal position on the leg. This model may be used when it is desirable to control stress on the ACL, e.g., in the rehabilitative period after ACL repairs or reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2929836     DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  18 in total

1.  Adaptation of a foot plate for use in an isokinetic and isotonic leg press.

Authors:  H K Amato; L A Smith
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Effects of muscular fatigue on knee joint laxity and neuromuscular characteristics of male and female athletes.

Authors:  S L Rozzi; S M Lephart; F H Fu
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Electromyographic evaluation of closed and open kinetic chain knee rehabilitation exercises.

Authors:  V L Graham; G M Gehlsen; J A Edwards
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The 2011 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: 'Lab'-in-a-knee: in vivo knee forces, kinematics, and contact analysis.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Shantanu Patil; Nicolai Steklov; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity.

Authors:  E Kellis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  A quantifiable approach in the comparison of isokinetic assessment data--new correlation equations for the Johnson antishear device and standard shin pad in the isokinetic assessment of the knee.

Authors:  C K Li; K M Chan; Y S Hsu; P Chien; W N Wong
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Radiographic assessment of sagittal knee instability in weight bearing. A study on anterior cruciate-deficient knees.

Authors:  N Egund; T Fridén; J Hjarbaek; A Lindstrand; R Stockerup
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Effect of antagonist muscle fatigue on knee extension torque.

Authors:  J G M Beltman; A J Sargeant; D Ball; C N Maganaris; A de Haan
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 3.657

9.  A handheld computer as part of a portable in vivo knee joint load monitoring system.

Authors:  Ja Szivek; Vs Nandakumar; Cp Geffre; Cp Townsend
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 0.582

10.  The Johnson antishear device and standard shin pad in the isokinetic assessment of the knee.

Authors:  C K Li; K M Chan; S Y Hsu; P Chien; M W Wong; Y Yuan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.