BACKGROUND: Tibiofemoral forces are important in the design and clinical outcomes of TKA. We developed a tibial tray with force transducers and a telemetry system to directly measure tibiofemoral compressive forces in vivo. Knee forces and kinematics traditionally have been measured under laboratory conditions. Although this approach is useful for quantitative measurements and experimental studies, the extrapolation of results to clinical conditions may not always be valid. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore developed wearable monitoring equipment and computer algorithms for classifying and identifying unsupervised activities outside the laboratory. METHODS: Tibial forces were measured for activities of daily living, athletic and recreational activities, and with orthotics and braces, during 4 years postoperatively. Additional measurements included video motion analysis, EMG, fluoroscopic kinematic analysis, and ground reaction force measurement. In vivo measurements were used to evaluate computer models of the knee. Finite element models were used for contact analysis and for computing knee kinematics from measured knee forces. A third-generation system was developed for continuous monitoring of knee forces and kinematics outside the laboratory using a wearable data acquisition hardware. RESULTS: By using measured knee forces and knee flexion angle, we were able to compute femorotibial AP translation (-12 to +4 mm), mediolateral translation (-1 to 1.5 mm), axial rotation (-3° to 12°), and adduction-abduction (-1° to +1°). The neural-network-based classification system was able to identify walking, stair-climbing, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit activities with 100% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data may be used to improve existing in vitro models and wear simulators, and enhance prosthetic designs and biomaterials.
BACKGROUND: Tibiofemoral forces are important in the design and clinical outcomes of TKA. We developed a tibial tray with force transducers and a telemetry system to directly measure tibiofemoral compressive forces in vivo. Knee forces and kinematics traditionally have been measured under laboratory conditions. Although this approach is useful for quantitative measurements and experimental studies, the extrapolation of results to clinical conditions may not always be valid. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore developed wearable monitoring equipment and computer algorithms for classifying and identifying unsupervised activities outside the laboratory. METHODS: Tibial forces were measured for activities of daily living, athletic and recreational activities, and with orthotics and braces, during 4 years postoperatively. Additional measurements included video motion analysis, EMG, fluoroscopic kinematic analysis, and ground reaction force measurement. In vivo measurements were used to evaluate computer models of the knee. Finite element models were used for contact analysis and for computing knee kinematics from measured knee forces. A third-generation system was developed for continuous monitoring of knee forces and kinematics outside the laboratory using a wearable data acquisition hardware. RESULTS: By using measured knee forces and knee flexion angle, we were able to compute femorotibial AP translation (-12 to +4 mm), mediolateral translation (-1 to 1.5 mm), axial rotation (-3° to 12°), and adduction-abduction (-1° to +1°). The neural-network-based classification system was able to identify walking, stair-climbing, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit activities with 100% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data may be used to improve existing in vitro models and wear simulators, and enhance prosthetic designs and biomaterials.
Authors: A J Baliunas; D E Hurwitz; A B Ryals; A Karrar; J P Case; J A Block; T P Andriacchi Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Dina L Jones; Jane A Cauley; Andrea M Kriska; Stephen R Wisniewski; James J Irrgang; David A Heck; C Kent Kwoh; Lawrence S Crossett Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Bernd Stöckl; Michael Nogler; Rafal Rosiek; Martin Fischer; Martin Krismer; Oliver Kessler Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Peter F Sharkey; William J Hozack; Richard H Rothman; Shani Shastri; Sidney M Jacoby Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: William A Manning; Kanishka Ghosh; Alasdair Blain; Lee Longstaff; David John Deehan Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: William F Zimmerman; Mark A Miller; Richard J Cleary; Timothy H Izant; Kenneth A Mann Journal: J Biomech Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 2.712