Literature DB >> 12851821

Effect of antagonist muscle fatigue on knee extension torque.

J G M Beltman1, A J Sargeant, D Ball, C N Maganaris, A de Haan.   

Abstract

The effect of hamstring fatigue on knee extension torque was examined at different knee angles for seven male subjects. Before and after a dynamic flexion fatigue protocol (180 degrees s(-1), until dynamic torque had declined by 50%), maximal voluntary contraction extension torque was measured at four knee flexion angles (90 degrees, 70 degrees, 50 degrees and 30 degrees ). Maximal torque generating capacity and voluntary activation of the quadriceps muscle were determined using electrical stimulation. Average rectified EMG of the biceps femoris was determined. Mean dynamic flexion torque declined by 48+/-11%. Extensor maximal voluntary contraction torque, maximal torque generating capacity, voluntary activation and average rectified EMG at the four knee angles were unaffected by the hamstring fatigue protocol. Only at 50 degrees knee angle was voluntary activation significantly lower (15.7%) after fatigue ( P<0.05). In addition, average rectified EMG before fatigue was not significantly influenced by knee angle. It was concluded that a fatigued hamstring muscle did not increase the maximal voluntary contraction extension torque and knee angle did not change coactivation. Three possible mechanisms may explain the results: a potential difference in recruited fibre populations in antagonist activity compared with the fibres which were fatigued in the protocol, a smaller loss in isometric torque generating capacity of the hamstring muscle than was expected from the dynamic measurements and/or a reduction in voluntary activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12851821     DOI: 10.1007/s00424-003-1115-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pflugers Arch        ISSN: 0031-6768            Impact factor:   3.657


  30 in total

1.  Dynamic joint forces during knee isokinetic exercise.

Authors:  K R Kaufman; K N An; W J Litchy; B F Morrey; E Y Chao
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Quantification of quadriceps and hamstring antagonist activity.

Authors:  E Kellis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Coordination of the thigh muscles in static leg extension.

Authors:  V Eloranta
Journal:  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun

4.  Tibiofemoral joint forces during isokinetic knee extension.

Authors:  R Nisell; M O Ericson; G Németh; J Ekholm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Strain within the anterior cruciate ligament during hamstring and quadriceps activity.

Authors:  P Renström; S W Arms; T S Stanwyck; R J Johnson; M H Pope
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Electromyographic patterns accompanying isokinetic exercise under varying speed and sequencing conditions.

Authors:  L R Osternig; J Hamill; D M Corcos; J Lander
Journal:  Am J Phys Med       Date:  1984-12

7.  Anterior-posterior and rotational displacement of the tibia elicited by quadriceps contraction.

Authors:  S Hirokawa; M Solomonow; Y Lu; Z P Lou; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The synergistic action of the anterior cruciate ligament and thigh muscles in maintaining joint stability.

Authors:  M Solomonow; R Baratta; B H Zhou; H Shoji; W Bose; C Beck; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1987 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Muscular coactivation. The role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability.

Authors:  R Baratta; M Solomonow; B H Zhou; D Letson; R Chuinard; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The effect of joint velocity on the contribution of the antagonist musculature to knee stiffness and laxity.

Authors:  S Hagood; M Solomonow; R Baratta; B H Zhou; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  3 in total

1.  The role of agonist and antagonist muscles in explaining isometric knee extension torque variation with hip joint angle.

Authors:  Theodoros M Bampouras; Neil D Reeves; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Constantinos N Maganaris
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Muscle coactivation: a generalized or localized motor control strategy?

Authors:  Laura A Frey-Law; Keith G Avin
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Antagonist Muscle Prefatigue Increases the Intracortical Communication between Contralateral Motor Cortices during Elbow Extension Contraction.

Authors:  Lejun Wang; Aidi Ma; Yuting Wang; Songhui You; Aiyun Lu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.682

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.