Literature DB >> 29296716

MRD detection in multiple myeloma: comparison between MSKCC 10-color single-tube and EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube methods.

Mikhail Roshal1, Juan A Flores-Montero2,3,4, Qi Gao1, Maesa Koeber5, Jessica Wardrope1, Brian G M Durie6, Ahmet Dogan1, Alberto Orfao2,3,4, Ola Landgren5.   

Abstract

In patients with multiple myeloma, obtaining posttreatment minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity is associated with longer progression-free survival and overall survival. Here, we compared the diagnostic performance of a single 10-color tube with that of a EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube panel for MRD testing. Bone marrow samples from 41 multiple myeloma patients were tested in parallel using the 2 approaches. Compared with the sum of the cells from the EuroFlow two 8-color tubes, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) single 10-color tube had a slight reduction in total cell number with a mean ratio of 0.85 (range, 0.57-1.46; P < .05), likely attributable to permeabilization of the cells. Percent of plasma cells showed a high degree of concordance (r2 = 0.97) as did normal plasma cells (r2 = 0.96), consistent with no selective plasma cell loss. Importantly, concordant measurement of residual disease burden was seen with abnormal plasma cells (r2 = 0.97). The overall concordance between the 2 tests was 98%. In 1 case, there was a discrepancy near the limit of detection of both tests in favor of the slightly greater theoretical sensitivity of the EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube panel (analytical sensitivity limit of MSKCC single 10-color tube: 6 cells in 1 million with at least 3 million cell acquisitions; EuroFlow 8-color 2-tube panel: 2 cells in 1 million with the recommended 10 million cell acquisitions).

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29296716      PMCID: PMC5728052          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016003715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  17 in total

1.  Single-Tube 10-Fluorochrome Analysis for Efficient Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Plasma Cell Myeloma.

Authors:  Daniel J Royston; Qi Gao; Nghia Nguyen; Peter Maslak; Ahmet Dogan; Mikhail Roshal
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Flow cytometry detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: Lessons learned at FDA-NCI roundtable symposium.

Authors:  Ola Landgren; Nicole Gormley; Danielle Turley; Roger G Owen; Andy Rawstron; Bruno Paiva; David Barnett; Maria Arroz; Paul Wallace; Brian Durie; Constance Yuan; Ahmet Dogan; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Gerald E Marti
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 3.  Importance of achieving a complete response in multiple myeloma, and the impact of novel agents.

Authors:  Asher A Chanan-Khan; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Immunophenotype of normal vs. myeloma plasma cells: Toward antibody panel specifications for MRD detection in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Juan Flores-Montero; Ruth de Tute; Bruno Paiva; José Juan Perez; Sebastian Böttcher; Henk Wind; Luzalba Sanoja; Noemí Puig; Quentin Lecrevisse; María Belén Vidriales; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.058

5.  Flow cytometry quality requirements for monitoring of minimal disease in plasma cell myeloma.

Authors:  Teri A Oldaker; Paul K Wallace; David Barnett
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.058

6.  Assessment of minimal residual disease in myeloma and the need for a consensus approach.

Authors:  Andy C Rawstron; Bruno Paiva; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.058

Review 7.  International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Bruno Paiva; Kenneth C Anderson; Brian Durie; Ola Landgren; Philippe Moreau; Nikhil Munshi; Sagar Lonial; Joan Bladé; Maria-Victoria Mateos; Meletios Dimopoulos; Efstathios Kastritis; Mario Boccadoro; Robert Orlowski; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Andrew Spencer; Jian Hou; Wee Joo Chng; Saad Z Usmani; Elena Zamagni; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Sundar Jagannath; Hans E Johnsen; Evangelos Terpos; Anthony Reiman; Robert A Kyle; Pieter Sonneveld; Paul G Richardson; Philip McCarthy; Heinz Ludwig; Wenming Chen; Michele Cavo; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Suzanne Lentzsch; Jens Hillengass; Antonio Palumbo; Alberto Orfao; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesus San Miguel; Herve Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Next Generation Flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J Flores-Montero; L Sanoja-Flores; B Paiva; N Puig; O García-Sánchez; S Böttcher; V H J van der Velden; J-J Pérez-Morán; M-B Vidriales; R García-Sanz; C Jimenez; M González; J Martínez-López; A Corral-Mateos; G-E Grigore; R Fluxá; R Pontes; J Caetano; L Sedek; M-C Del Cañizo; J Bladé; J-J Lahuerta; C Aguilar; A Bárez; A García-Mateo; J Labrador; P Leoz; C Aguilera-Sanz; J San-Miguel; M-V Mateos; B Durie; J J M van Dongen; A Orfao
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Role of MRD status in relation to clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  O Landgren; S Devlin; M Boulad; S Mailankody
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Minimal residual disease in myeloma by flow cytometry: independent prediction of survival benefit per log reduction.

Authors:  Andy C Rawstron; Walter M Gregory; Ruth M de Tute; Faith E Davies; Sue E Bell; Mark T Drayson; Gordon Cook; Graham H Jackson; Gareth J Morgan; J Anthony Child; Roger G Owen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring minimal residual disease in the bone marrow using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Even H Rustad; Eileen M Boyle
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Determination of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Does It Matter?

Authors:  Shalin Kothari; Jens Hillengass; Philip L McCarthy; Sarah A Holstein
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Pilot Study of Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Pre- and Post-Risk-Adapted Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AL Amyloidosis.

Authors:  Heather Landau; Oscar Lahoud; Sean Devlin; Nikoletta Lendvai; David J Chung; Ahmet Dogan; C Ola Landgren; Sergio Giralt; Hani Hassoun
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Comparison of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis of peripheral blood and bone marrow-based flow cytometry for tracking measurable residual disease in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marion Eveillard; Even Rustad; Mikhail Roshal; Yanming Zhang; Amanda Ciardiello; Neha Korde; Malin Hultcrantz; Sydney Lu; Urvi Shah; Hani Hassoun; Eric Smith; Alexander Lesokhin; Sham Mailankody; Ola Landgren; Katie Thoren
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 5.  Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Joseph D Tario; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

6.  Stem Cell Mobilization and Autograft Minimal Residual Disease Negativity with Novel Induction Regimens in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Susan Bal; Heather J Landau; Gunjan L Shah; Michael Scordo; Parastoo Dahi; Oscar B Lahoud; Hani Hassoun; Malin Hultcrantz; Neha Korde; Nikoletta Lendvai; Alexander M Lesokhin; Sham Mailankody; Urvi A Shah; Eric Smith; Sean M Devlin; Scott Avecilla; Ahmet Dogan; Mikhail Roshal; Ola Landgren; Sergio A Giralt; David J Chung
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Minimal residual disease negativity in multiple myeloma is associated with intestinal microbiota composition.

Authors:  Matthew J Pianko; Sean M Devlin; Eric R Littmann; Aisara Chansakul; Donna Mastey; Meghan Salcedo; Emily Fontana; Lilan Ling; Elizabet Tavitian; John B Slingerland; Ann E Slingerland; Annelie Clurman; Antonio L C Gomes; Ying Taur; Eric G Pamer; Jonathan U Peled; Marcel R M van den Brink; Ola Landgren; Alexander M Lesokhin
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 8.  Clinical value of measurable residual disease testing for multiple myeloma and implementation in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takamatsu
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.490

9.  Minimal Residual Disease Negativity Does Not Overcome Poor Prognosis in High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chutima Kunacheewa; Hans C Lee; Krina Patel; Sheeba Thomas; Behrang Amini; Samer Srour; Qaiser Bashir; Yago Nieto; Muzzaffar H Qazilbash; Donna M Weber; Lei Feng; Robert Z Orlowski; Pei Lin; Elisabet E Manasanch
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2020-01-15

Review 10.  Comprehensive characterization of circulating and bone marrow-derived multiple myeloma cells at minimal residual disease.

Authors:  Johannes M Waldschmidt; Praveen Anand; Birgit Knoechel; Jens G Lohr
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.851

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.